Tea Party Vs. Occupy Wall Street

The Undeniable Truth

It’s impossible to argue with a straight face that there’s any real similarities between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street, and yet that is the contention of some who allege that both are protest movements aimed at reform.  If that’s the extent of their similarity, those who claim this as the basis for a relationship between the two are stuck in superficial characteristic that permit one to claim that an orange and a basketball are nearly the same.  The Tea Party is predicated on the idea that the best government is that which governs least, while the Occupiers, to the degree you can discern any central agenda, are concerned only with tearing portions of the private sector down.

It doesn’t take a genius to see the dissimilarities far outweigh superficial observations, yet this is the argument you get from leftist shills.  Other superficial differences include that the majority of both groups is Caucasian, and male, but in demographic terms, this is the end of similarities.  The Tea Party folks are somewhat older, and somewhat more settled in life, and have already engaged in productive activities for most of their lives, while it seems Occupiers seem to be those who haven’t quite yet figured out what they want to be when they finish growing up.  If that seems a bit condescending, I will confess that  I’m caught, but only because that is my own observation.

The key distinction between the two groups stems from this:  The Tea Party has a generic ideological and philosophical basis that its numbers understand, whereas the Occupiers seem to have a scatter-shot approach to issues, and if you examine any of them in isolation from the others, there’s no guarantee that you’ll be able to learn anything about the beliefs of the group, except perhaps that they all think they deserve something, somehow provided by others. They want their student loans forgiven, or they want banks closed down, or they want capitalism brought to heel under the boot of statism.  They abhor globalization, but simultaneously say they’re in favor of free trade.  They say they want opportunities, but they have squandered many by their own admissions.

In short, while it’s quite easy to make out what the Tea Party wants, it’s no so easy to understand anything about the Occupiers’ demands, because theirs are a moving target, and they seem to modify them daily.  They have no electoral agenda, except perhaps that they generically favor Obama, but none of them can tell you why with any sort of conviction.  In all, I find it odd that anybody would take serious such a comparison, until you understand how thoroughly the Occupiers failed.  They were ginned up to be the left’s answer to the Tea Party, but as the record shows, their behavior in public and private spaces brought them no shortage of negative coverage.  It’s so bad that they don’t even bother pretending there is a degree of moral superiority as occurred at the outset, but instead seek to improve their position by the comparison, attaching themselves to Tea Party by way of false claims of similar purpose.

Of course, now that they’ve seen how badly they’ve been received by the American people, a number of Occupiers are now, belatedly joining in on the anti-Obama bandwagon.  As Yahoo reported, Obama has brought the two groups together, but only because increasingly, both are now opposing him.  Even in this, however, they’re not really together, as the demands of Occupiers seems to be for the President to move even further left.  Clearly, that’s not a message the Tea Party will endorse.  It’s simply not true to say that the two groups are similar, and even the Yahoo article goes on to admit that this is the case.  Still, it’s interesting to watch the purveyors of leftwing propaganda try to paint the Occupy Wall Street movement as a younger, grungier Tea Party, but until its members learn how to find jobs and pay their own bills, never mind bath, it’s going to remain a hard sell.

Like Be the first one who likes this post!
  • http://commonsense21c.com felton williamson

    OBAMA AND HIS CRONIES EXPRESS SUPPORT FOR THE “OCCUPY WALL STREET” DEMONSTRATIONS

    The objective of the ”Occupy Wall Street” movement is to create the chaos that justifies the declaration of martial law and suspension the constitution, thus creating a Dictatorship. This is the final phase of the Obama agenda and the Wannabe Tyrant expects to be a Dictator at the conclusion.

    President Obama's agenda is creating an economic crisis. If that agenda continues the economic crisis will reach its peak before the 2012 election. This latest stimulus plan guarantees that economic crisis. Politicians are not reelected during an economic crisis. The wannabe tyrants cannot afford free elections in 2012.

    Only by creating the chaos that justifies martial law and suspension of the Constitution can the wannabe tyrants retain their power.

    The American Revolution has not been in such danger since the War of 1812. Will we allow the tyranny of King George III to be reinstated under new management? http://commonsense21c.com/EPILOGUE.html

  • fred johnson

    Mark Good write up. I think the first thing everyone needs to look at with the OCCUPY things is. Who is leading them Van Jones & George Soros. now knowing the connection between Jones/Soros/Obum-ma. Who is paying for all of this? We the taxpayer I am sure somehow. What are there real goals? I am sure befor the summer is over it will be RIOTS/VIOLENCE. All being controled from the WHITE HOUSE. Part of there goal will be to discredit groups. The main one -the tea party.with the unions and there army of thugs right along side of them. I am sure the White House will get around to calling it the AMERICAN spring/summer/fall or whatever. It's going to get real ugly befor it's over. the worst part is we will let it happen. we will see new "orders" signed to control the masses.

  • Pingback: Tea Party Vs. Occupy Wall Street « Mark America | Occupy Wall Street Info()