When you invite the world into your bedroom, don’t expect the world to withhold comments. When you invite government to fund healthcare, there will be no holding back the ultimate encroachment into personal privacy. There’s no ambiguity here. When Sandra Fluke testified before Congress, she invited this, but more importantly, when leftists shoved government healthcare down our throats, beginning in the 1960s, and culminating finally in “Obamacare,” the whole question of privacy was suppressed with a finality that most people simply won’t like: The government is involved in your healthcare. By definition, it is no longer private information. You cannot bring government into the matter of contraception without inviting it ultimately into your doctor’s office, your bathroom, and your bedroom.
People who are defending Fluke are ignoring the simple fact that when you make your sexuality and things related to it a matter of public record and government interest, you’re holding the door open for public judgments. Your reproductive health, but also the health of your kidneys is subject to governmental review. Do not offer that you haven’t understood where this would lead. Fluke wants others to be compelled to cover her contraception. What did she expect would happen? If you come to me and say “hey, pal, I need you to pay for…my kids to eat,” you can expect that I will soon ask you why you have so many children. As long as people are going to try to redistribute their private burdens onto the public account, there should be no claim whatsoever that the demand-makers can avoid public judgment. They’re inviting them.
What do you think is the meaning of the implementation of the various state EBT cards, so that at the grocery check-out, those living off of the rest of us can avoid any alleged stigma previously associated with food-stamps? They want the dignity associated with the appearance of paying their own way without the necessity of actually doing so. Such people are frauds, but their first victim is always themselves. Before they can fool the rest of us, they must first pretend to themselves that this procedure is fine, and that there is no shame in any of it. I won’t permit it. I’m not going to let charlatans parade around as though they are anything other than what the facts reveal.
If you’re a college student, or anybody else for that matter, and you wish to avoid pregnancy, but cannot afford your own contraceptives, there’s a simple answer, and as Foster Freiss might offer, it may involve an aspirin. As a member of the paying public, my first response when you demand free contraception is:
“Nothing is free. Why do you think I should pay for it?”
What can you answer? What is your moral premise? What is the basis for your claim against my wallet? There are two important principles here, and the first is that to Ms. Fluke and any like her who demand contraception funded by others, the only rational answer must be “No.” It’s an important word, and just as it applies in this context, where I do not give my consent, Ms. Fluke and all those like her should consider adding the word to their own vocabularies, in which case contraception might no longer be such a pressing necessity.
I don’t know anything about Fluke’s sexual habits, and I don’t really care. I simply don’t wish to pay for them, and I don’t want government compelling coverages on faith-based institutions, including the university at which she is a student. Her sexual life became a matter of public concern when she made it one. She is not a victim of Rush Limbaugh, or anybody else. She’s a victim of her own desire to put a gun to the heads of people of faith who will be coerced under the auspices of Obamacare to cover her contraceptive needs.
This is the truth of this issue, and when you consider what Obamacare will actually impose, from death-panels to medical records databases, and access to your financial records, it’s clear that there will be no effective protection of privacy. I don’t know how any rational person can believe that they can get somebody else to pay for something on their behalf, and still maintain privacy. You have a heart condition? The government will know. Diabetes? The government will know. Herpes? The government will know. They will know everything about you including the weight you register when you step on the scale in your doctor’s office.
What do you think has been the meaning of the “war on obesity,” the “war on bad eating habits,” the “war on smoking” or the “war on salt?” Wait until this system begets a “war on sexuality” or some such thing. It’s only a matter of time, because in the hands of politicians, it will be unavoidable. There will be no privacy. You will face inevitable judgments if you rely upon government directly or indirectly to meet or mandate the fulfillment of your needs. Sandra Fluke complains that she’s going broke paying for contraception, and that may be the case, but life is full of choices, and it’s time for her to grow up and make them, or sustain the judgments heaped upon her for demanding others carry the burdens those choices impose.