On Friday, Karl Rove was further exposed as misleading and disingenuous. In an email response to his appearance on Thursday’s O’Reilly Factor, in which Rove claimed to have been the Director of Reagan’s 1980 Campaign in Texas, Reagan Biographer Craig Shirley responded via Daily Caller, explaining that Rove was no such thing. In point of fact, Karl Rove ran Governor Clements’ effort for Reagan, but only after George W. Bush was defeated in the primary. Do you understand? Rove was a George H.W. Bush supporter, as was Texas Governor Bill Clements, for whom Rove worked at the time. You see, Clements was a strong Bush supporter throughout the primaries, but there’s more to consider in this story. First, watch Rove plead his case on Bill O’Reilly’s softball show:
You might wonder, watching Rove misrepresent his role in the Texas campaign for Ronald Reagan, whether it’s such a big deal that he first supported George H.W. Bush. After all, it’s not that unusual for a candidate’s supporters to move over to the nominee’s campaign in some role after the primaries. That said, there’s something very important I want you to consider, and it’s obvious as the spin flowing from Karl Rove’s lips:
In 1980, Rove chose Bush. Consider his dubious argument about supporting “the most conservative candidate who can win.” It seems the most conservative candidate did win, but it wasn’t Rove’s choice in the primary in 1980. Instead, Ronald Reagan won, and he was far more conservative than Rove’s choice. Of course, that’s not all you need to know. In 1976, Ronald Reagan was fighting with Gerald Ford for the GOP nomination, and Karl Rove chose a horse to ride in that race too. Ronald Reagan? No, ladies and gentlemen, Karl Rove was all aboard for Gerald Ford. Gerald Ford lost to Jimmy Carter, and so it was true that once again, Rove apparently picked “the most conservative candidate who could win,” though neither did.
That’s the truth about Karl Rove. In 1978, Karl Rove ran the losing George W. Bush campaign for congress. In 2000, his candidate nearly lost, and did lose the popular vote. In 2004, his candidate barely squeaked by a very weak John Kerry. In 2006, his strategies lost the House and Senate. In 2012, he backed Romney early and often, and Mitt Romney lost. Karl Rove’s record of picking winners is abysmal. He clearly doesn’t know a conservative from a turnip, never mind a winner. You must stop falling for his strategies, and as Mark Levin pointed out on Friday evening, Rove is attacking Steve King(R-IA) incessantly and dishonestly. I repeat my sentiment to those who hope to reclaim leadership in the GOP: If you want any hope of winning, Karl Rove must go.