The Hoaxers Get Caught Again - Media Silent
For those who harbored any doubts about the political nature of the scientists running the “Global Warming” or “Global Climate Change” hoax on the world, those doubts should have been erased now and forevermore. A new batch of 5000 emails has been delivered to the press anonymously, and these emails are even more damning than the first round of emails released two years ago. What these emails demonstrate is both the degree to which politics motivates the so-called “science” and the extent to which the conspirators have gone to conceal the totality of the evidence. It’s the same list of climate hoaxers, and the same axis of dishonesty becomes readily apparent. What’s even more stunning is that the US government is in collusion with the hoaxers. From the Forbes piece:
“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email.
“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”
You may remember Phil Jones as the man at the center of the first email scandal two years ago, and it seems Jones hasn’t learned any lesson but one: He must work even harder to conceal the truth from the world than ever before. Rather than simply resort to science, Jones’ emails show the intent to continue the fraud, and hide the data from the public, and here he admits that the US Department of Energy is agreeable to keeping the original temperature station data secret. You pay for this agency, and yes, the same agency is at the center of the entire “Green Energy” scam, so what we clearly have is a rogue agency of the United States government that is acting contrary to the public interest. So much for “openness and transparency.”
If this isn’t bad enough, Michael Mann has been looking for “journalists” who would investigate and smear skeptics:
“I have been talking w/ folks in the states about finding an investigative journalist to investigate and expose” skeptical scientist Steve McIntyre, Mann writes in another newly released email.
This is simply outrageous conduct for a so-called “scientist.” Clearly, Mann is more interested in trying to harm Steve McIntyre than to refute his research. This is horrendous, but as bad as this attempt at smearing others may be, the motive for the smear is made clear in other emails:
“Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary,” writes Peter Thorne of the UK Met Office.
“I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run,” Thorne adds.
That says it all. They have to fake it to make their case, and rely upon one dubious study while ignoring many more that contradict their general claim. In short, they are lying to you, and to the UN, and to all the people in all the nations who are being ruled by those sympathetic to their scam, which at this point clearly includes the Obama Administration and the EPA as well as the Department of Energy.
Phil Jones may be engaged in outright fraud. He has gone to great lengths to conceal information from various FOIA requests:
“With the earlier FOI requests re David Holland, I wasted a part of a day deleting numerous emails and exchanges with almost all the skeptics. So I have virtually nothing. I even deleted the email that I inadvertently sent. There might be some bits of pieces of paper, but I’m not wasting my time going through these.”
Add to this that a new study by Dr. Andreas Schmitter of Oregon State University that strongly suggests the concerns over Global Warming due to increasing CO2 is vastly overstated, according to the Daily Mail:
‘The results imply less probability of extreme climatic change than previously thought.’
Dr Schmittner told the Daily Mail that it would be ‘virtually impossible’ for a doubling of carbon dioxide to cause temperatures to rise by 8c or 10c.
Let’s be perfectly honest about what this means. It cannot be claimed that there is a “consensus” on Global Warming, or CO2′s impact upon it, never mind mankind’s effect on the climate. One recent study indicates that the actual culprit in any observable warming may not even be terrestrial in origin. Henrik Svensmark’s work supports the notion that cloud formation is greatly affected by cosmic rays, and that cloud formation plays an important role in climate. CERN recently confirmed his earlier findings, but what this demonstrates is that in the real world of science, outside of the control of politically motivated hacks at the UN’s IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) that science is far from any alleged “consensus” on the matter.
Meanwhile, the hacks continue to carry on as though they’ve not been caught. What is needed in this instance is a complete withdrawal of US Government support for the whole Climate Change/Global Warming Hoax, to include de-funding of the UN’s IPCC and any other politically motivated group related to this issue. What many have long argued in criticism of the global warming regime is that it was intended as a method by which to enact new taxes on energy consumers. Whether that is the only motive is unclear, but it certainly makes sense. After all, for what other reason would this entire hoax be carried off if not to make us believe in a crisis as justification for further governmental involvement in our lives? I think the Congress should investigate, and if proven, those involved should be prosecuted for fraud. How many have made a living from this hoax? How many have plotted to defraud the American people, and indeed, people all around the globe? Climate-gate 2.0 is surely just the latest disclosure, but probably not the last. One would hope more responsible scientists would step forward to say to the Phil Jones/Michael Mann/Climate Hoaxer crowd: “Enough is enough, you’re ruining our good name.” With even some warmists now criticizing all of this, it seems there is a chance that the myth of “consensus” will finally be broken.
My question is: Will the Nobel Committee ask Al Gore to return the prize and the cash?
For more reading on Global Warming: