Archive for the ‘Rick Perry’ Category

Barack Obama Dumps on Lone Star State

Tuesday, March 13th, 2012

He's Messing...

Being a Texan, though by choice, and not by birth, I have a great appreciation for this state and its basic sense of fairness.  Barack Obama has poked Texans in the eye, and I’m not particularly thrilled that this dictator is still running our country.  While he has already undertaken a number of policies that have been punitive to the Lone Star State, this time, he has stepped over a boundary in the sense that he’s actually accused Texans of what could only be called a sort of de facto racism. As usual, he did so through his equally thuggish Attorney General, Eric Holder, who issued an order instructing Texas not to enforce its new voter ID law, aimed at reducing vote fraud. This is just the latest in a long line of attacks on Texas by the radical Obama administration.  This is the sort of thing that convinces many Americans that Obama is not merely incompetent, but malevolent.

This is going too far, because if we must not identify voters with reasonable certainty that they are indeed eligible, then every eligible voter who takes the time to register and to vote is being cheated, and their votes are being diluted by each and every fraudulent, ineligible person who shows up to cast a vote. To me, and to most Texans, self-identification is a reasonable measure we can take to be sure that the outcomes of elections are legitimate.  Of course, Democrats hate the idea, being the party of institutionalized vote-fraud, so it’s easy to understand their treasonous motive.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has already filed suit, joining with South Carolina in pursuing action against the Federal Government.  I realize politics are involved here, but maybe that’s the point.  I think Governor Perry should make plans to enforce the law, pending action in the courts, and if the courts don’t act before the next elections, scheduled for May 29th, he should go ahead and enforce it and dare the Obama administration to stop him. Perry talks a good game about the Tenth Amendment, but will he stand up for it?

Of course, the argument of the Holder Justice Department is that the new Texas statute violates the Voting Rights Act, as preposterous a notion as has been offered in a long while.  The other argument of the leftists is that there is no evidence of significant vote fraud.  No kidding!  How can you create evidence without identifying voters?  If we never substantially audit the vote, because we cannot verify who actually voted, how in the world are we to provide evidence?

This is another typical leftist scam aimed at pumping up illegal votes for Democrats.  They’re never satisfied to go to the polls and let the chips fall where they may, because if that happened, there would be many fewer Democrats in office, and every person who has paid even scarce attention to this issue over the last few decades knows this.  In fact, it has long been thought that without the legions of the dead who ‘voted’ for him, John F. Kennedy might well have lost in 1960.  That would have changed history in many remarkable ways.  The truth is that this is an issue far too important to ignore, and for the sake of the country, we must begin to get a handle on fraud in voting.  Too much is at stake to let the games continue.

New Establishment Media Themes Emerge

Sunday, January 22nd, 2012

Making Newt into the Devil

In light of Newt Gingrich’s victory in the South Carolina primary on Saturday, two new themes have emerged that I am certain we will hear and read in the news throughout the the remainder of the week, and they’re both constructed to diminish Gingrich.  The first is that his personal favorability is low, and that people generally don’t have a positive impression of Gingrich, but the second is important only to those who are inside the Washington DC cloakrooms, who are not happy that Gingrich might win the primaries, and possibly win the Republican nomination. Plans have begun to hatch all over Washington DC on how to derail Gingrich, particularly if he does well in Florida, and you can count on the GOP’s establishment types to be hustled before the cameras with fresh endorsements of Mitt Romney. The insiders just don’t like Newt, and they don’t think he can defeat Obama, but more, they don’t like the fact that he may undo some of their favorite things if he were to win not only the nomination, but also the general election.  The hew and cry will go out as the establishment will say “Newt must now be stopped!”

It’s bad enough that they have concocted a theme regarding Newt’s “unreliability” and “zany” behavior, a charge often made of his public expressions of ideas that may be off-key, novel, or simply outside the conventional wisdom.  Now they are going to press forward with the idea that because people don’t like him, on a personal level, that prevents him from rising to electoral viability.  These are the same people who can’t wait to tell you how well-liked President Obama has been throughout his presidency. I can imagine the Gingrich retort, and it should be simply this: “People like to point out that my personal favorability is low, and that Barack Obama’s is high, but these same people fail to mention that the well-liked President is leading us off a cliff.  Does the elite media want the American people to believe that they should choose well-liked but incompetent over competent but not so well-liked?  This is typical of how out of touch Washington DC’s elites are with the real world Americans face.” Or something like that.

On the matter of the Washington elite not liking Gingrich, it’s very nearly the best selling point about Gingrich that you could raise in this election. In a similar fashion, I expect this theme to be destroyed as quickly as it is set up, but that won’t change the fact that behind the scenes, the elite in the GOP will continue to work to undermine him as best they can. The insiders took a bit of a drubbing in South Carolina when you consider the other scorecard, so now they will focus on the notion of Gingrich “electability.”

In the South Carolina primary, there were some winners and losers not tallied on the screen, but you should know them just the same. Among the not-so-obvious losers were Governors Chris Christie and Nikki Haley, whose endorsements seemed not to have made much difference to voters.  The biggest unlisted winner was former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, whose push to vote for Gingrich probably made the turnaround happen earlier this week. The other big winner from the Gingrich victory was Governor Rick Perry, whose endorsement of Newt came at just the right time to sustain him through dark hours. The last of the unlisted big winners was the Tea Party, which rallied for Newt, and this accounted for the boots on the ground that pushed him over the top.  Clearly, the Tea Party’s loyalties run more deeply to Sarah Palin and Newt Gingirch, than to Nikki Haley and Mitt Romney.  It’s a force with which the establishment has yet to effectively reckon.

Of course, as I reported on Friday, there is other blow-back for which we have yet to account, and it may yet show up in the form of some chicanery if Romney continues to falter in Florida.  It now seems that after some pressure was applied, Romney is back on for both of the debates scheduled next week in Florida, but if Gingrich should prevail in Florida as in South Carolina, you can expect the stuff to hit the fan among the establishment wing of the Republican party.  They might fetch out somebody else altogether, and you might see all sorts of infighting erupt.  Gingrich was never well-liked among DC insiders primarily because he had a tendency to foment real passion, a sort of a “loose cannon,” because they see him as an obstacle to business as usual.

Now, it’s not entirely fair to consider Gingrich an outsider, but he was never part of Washington’s “in crowd,” so if he manages to pull off a win in Florida, there will be bedlam in the party.  A Gingrich victory in Florida just might be the catalyst for a catastrophic boil-over within the party that has only been on simmer for the last several months.  It may just be the medicine we need to shake their endless grip loose from things, and possibly bring true reform to the party.  Myself, if it shakes up the party, I am prepared to endure it, and if a Gingrich win in Florida will make that happen, I will be only too happy if the voters there instigate this battle.  It’s something the party has needed for a generation, really since the exit of Reagan, and the word has gone out that Jeb Bush may not endorse Romney now after all, instead deciding to remain neutral.  That may be the best indicator yet that things are going to get nasty in the GOP, because it means the Bush clan may be preparing to dump a new ringer into the fight.

All things taken together, Saturday’s events in South Carolina have re-shaped this race, and that’s a good thing for the Republican party.  A little revolution is good now and then, but the prospect of a Gingrich presidency is more than the establishment GOP can stomach, so the long knives will now come out from every corner.  It’s also true that the left lives in terror of a debate stage with Gingrich facing Obama, and they will now push any theme at all to convince you to choose another direction.  They and the GOP establishment will become allies because “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” in their usual expedient manner.  Bank on it.


Thursday, January 19th, 2012


After having ridden the wave of the media meme that he had won Iowa and New Hampshire in unprecedented fashion, Mitt Romney’s “inevitable” nomination may not be.  We have the news Thursday morning that Rick Santorum actually won in Iowa, and while the media continues to spin that Santorum’s win is a “virtual tie,” they did not say that about Romney when it was thought he had won by a smaller margin.  Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich continues his surge in South Carolina, perhaps mostly unharmed by the seemingly old allegations by an ex-wife that are being pushed in the media.  It’s been announced that one hundred Tea Party leaders in from around the country will be supporting Gingrich, and with the classy, respectful exit of Rick Perry, and his subsequent endorsement of Gingrich, suddenly Romney no longer looks so inevitable, and we can expect this to have serious blow-back in the remaining days of the run-up to the South Carolina primary on Saturday.

What all of this should tell you is what a paper tiger Mitt Romney’s aura of invincibility had been.  Don’t misunderstand, as Mitt is hardly out of the running, but what this shows that his path to the nomination is going to be much more difficult and lengthy than many had assumed.  You also shouldn’t expect any less vigorous a campaign by Romney, while his superPACs will go after Gingrich with guns blazing now.  The next two days will consist of virtual bloodshed, as Romney and his surrogates are going for the throat in all parts of the media.  As I reported Wednesday, the Romney camp will try to push the mantra of Newt’s unreliability, but I don’t think that apt to take hold, because what the public has noticed that despite some anger over his treatment by Romney surrogates in Iowa, Gingrich has apparently returned to his form of November and December, focusing on a more positive message.

On Thursday afternoon, Sarah Palin talked with Sean Hannity on his radio show, and she said she thought the story aimed at Gingrich is perhaps in the process of back-firing, because the base of the Republican Party is tired of the media and establishment choosing their candidates.  This characterizes one of Romney’s problems:  He is widely seen as the GOP establishment’s candidate, and that is a big turn-off for the rank-and-file conservatives and Tea Party folks in the GOP.  This threatens to overwhelm all of this “inevitability” talk, and if as Palin suggests, there is a backlash against the media’s Gingrich attacks, Romney may well find additional trouble with his ongoing campaign based on smearing the former Speaker’s reliability.

Despite all of the external factors, Mitt’s largest obstacle remains his own record.  He hopes to capture this nomination by default, letting the others self-destruct (with timely help) while he simply survives.  Unfortunately, he has a well-established track record of vacillation on a variety of issues that makes him unacceptable to many.

Update: Here’s the Hannity/Palin radio interview from Thursday:

[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.1010638&w=425&h=350&–zxaveqb7j1MiIEv-Y7Gnv0rb4cYHYo2H_xCMl2nQeGcM4GGv9_AnhJMCgM-T8acZqbV-SGevznQuvm8ehisBTA_G0dbLs7N-jbGq0dQl8cf93Uzje4WB9NiazzPJ_H6f7L2vDuBmcReS7MbHracfL2S1t98qL68NRR8T1lcMkyQMFFk0kNakqLpazqKX5OZJYzxB4Fpcv5KoaWjPntBkVOCfsRLcpNExpoLJhIwuo8jkzV37tLD6iDojwGFd2o2SmCYTVCq6LiH0pfrTW6hgbxypqSbz89XDzYk09tTzXSVHqEUoO54x03u5CfsB02nSD-EXC5T9JOoqhkLzlba1hF8CLUhOCi_YaGWXw9QZKwhqX_hD0iT8nkf3NaxQKE41m6HvOpCg_Euqw_aF21YjngkhTHsXYWwMN6ERZpswue-7Uy3DD-otQXLjW8u1Deff2JmTIrsct0P0w6NLKw493Ya9FDvqfKMiFsbFHy2NKRRDmB4wuPsI5tWLAnEwXmBrvOgkM9CnSn2VY6vbngEOHijlkbSVq1MpjivgtBxDuBosHA0Lmtc71lsX-xozqXGk-7LBcxDPtPgHUhSUGSWe50wiLZaM1NHViVK-x9YnQUhnzHY3cHpBnmYKy5_vlnCBa4zec_HbKWQ0Un1Vt7G–ogBKyJ2M5VGIqujaDjQ0zDOi5Szp7wV8DLlxXqqqPBGEZUU_KJBFbfqQ5sivXA_txWEStYWm7HXGzHOdZdq4KdFqZa79MXGYzMQY175WsaGtkFAJ1KYzWM6BgkdhgC7cQNQew_evao1TFPyslJQit2QgApGjl-fypjlR2M7PwZWGRCEugh1O4UeYfxVeTR4sp3QfqOkvUz27uqViOMsm_Ur8kAj9bkL4o7bgB8zRn1N6gpvT8TeE1StyWwK2_4fKnoW2t02CCM6fSB8FC9MoOnjxiuKiU-s-VVYMRsHMZJ5bwO4CA5tbSJ2D6HlWxLl93MQUq3-ALBwzbwXVOVYLL-WsddBpT9aXc-xSXwSy3y7XoR-QDUqnYyMfGn2OU4gHsEwPSufbNp8HutiKJPfODUl0YCaBdcSgIprM6eZhoALCVVdnhly_K-ZJ44-t6rBV3NJ3Eg0PezEvr2i3BnsAG3jlXAT1gCnFY5zGvVmGyRCujmXd9cgE9mGNw7LAif1prg7Y5-_Frd0s103DdUr2SwvMLKLZ2YRQUiQLlZ0PSOiRWOcSMTwdWwtfbvm8tNwC6DsgbrjGhQMpx-F2smpr5qcnGgvyll6PbqUmhG6h9YY43syrhpn9MVsdvhObBnGKefXE7Rhcf49TPMI96vsHrG2vyp8pZdO6JhuEmYJ7aZOEgZbIBY_0d1YUT26r_O1VX2ONdwuX_WfrhR6nw_zl55EOPOs_vBtLgidY9OSrFtTmf_UuBlP3TAPkCvN7QMIoJjo8EQAjeQrleyYecruRl1xwAJ5N292yssss-h-CXsklciXVlvMdw8SLABpSNdUYXC5g-sZnbS6J4UC-RvQGbirR_8fdaNntr89zgT6lzxBemagZ9egDunJ4G1jscO3zQvvSSleiCrg8CQhTGxyRculUNsqUnLrMF_lAZr59dL4VyZO0FV3OMqO6yicLN9rJQq5ihH9Job_hJXXV4VSI0YQ2_LBfptqNBplPUgcAFITKn_Nenbbt9tSZzkYFNdBzpDX_Mvx9ydCEgG9iON2buNDM9pCCGdnQJDsGS10iviZ9f3hhyKPYNkf1286etj1QUTAFQJTYh4W9Etbv6Cni1swEZucYlk3OoRAmjYJx9bwy_1mJQgsvStvYtGJqeqmPkLp_d0bGzjjH7Gpx2voBNxFuIzaatQg91O6I4E6aqdGsBw8EwOl6nzGUphUObXNWNBFg_o9H_wW4sOC02JxQmyCTHHhyj1pcPduq49asIUd616Sr0sz9_ghg_NmdlGn1hxqSh7JTG0zp8cP2-LiZkKMt6i4JMIorQnmh9Me6p1j5wXSCITror6BlfopkiltGd7tHWz4blXeofbo2_5cBKrSUXkLpf2ncPg9E-brgAdrhet_zBAbhBvBUCiHcvLZf1ZZZvM1_tyhUVoxADVXitZelt1mBuxwNR6za6G-oGw1iBRdP5N5zDTM6hictb3y5YEdpLRJL4Fi5Z0iYCQe7YdyNoEF31dXyKUDRTO_4vy-eaiXqrVaDLT3Kxv8Nb9NS9ELUsHMnh8xICZtRslNBc1JrAliREB-MprMC4_TUtvEEXNgW-KQkNpxUZfAVhK8iVYkITJ0C-S9BjP2W3eR_UzExO6h_cW5vxlTCyvlFFJ0N7Uyl7nQC0wwhBj3hNydZM6dCZmwl2pVjUolzw-6mM3WPTSZf0mC67zgs2J0DiXnIcGlOPfII_UdzpXJBxFPfNC6-x85w0sRpQpLbjmI41PMd13XJnlu355YcDcXo_mt_QIpIhl-zxg70yE4KXc4ZP3OIhYg-5ssIMfO_-qadzCphxdp1Gkw2ICwWcXgZOVWa9S2B5L21wzRTpbCh37TQH4aMwH807J0gC1_s5pmzbpWSE8zyzFWhJR2tLCgRpKH0IeLahKJzvcraLO6dWQMtgvqukYPVsY6v2n5gqytLkhd0ZJPaE9L8ZzUoziQdBuYEQdwn48jI2AF0RiuacS96U8MefOxg24icLCcl0MdCPkYmuSnxSCHaKwcr6hUyq7cpeNoiZ-RhzeaLzdLjhGgh8FAWNHh08cjXynR08619WEpKwUWG2SmqyTrqqWvjttl3dcgi8jJlT7pV7bLgKxrdij24su7VA-U0r6OYiZ47dI90-P3uUdGV2kwID1JFtnoN4ZYzY7UHCaLphL85UwYD3cHksAnyBE0StiX10txGu4a-WSsLjjQQAkefooIPSJ6RQYqxtlszC5114CC5Za_CEb-z41VacQxNPWraIzdAidqXzN1R8Of2FtItxld3D_XpRtoak6SZy-kI0HdJfV3IFcyxqmBVppllreDGwE7BZtIDBDu_kUp8MJ7hBhkeLhCikvMZvhXdxgepOu707n58GzjvxD91vmzj-ptZKtAUVe-azZSZ9chQJE0925r2DSGsmGQWOCAC054_cmBmVaFFJz9qz1xyitrTyR6qzrBF5srlHdsJohiYyCIws06bF__Uu1DOWEZQ8QzlAFQUZU5MMFOTZ0jhO9HrkDHvBrkwK2BMZ_vQDik4OBXmzB733Rx21OB4CIA_iC_3SGlxE5HE_lul7oxQgiHol808Zs6yzDrtjk6ZLD_cHhVsbcwEFQ1spBjXb412Bao2pqq3wmuKk3Xg7fngq539Nf5MM5VZF3hA09Tb4itJzvO8fuwfLnoPLHe6g4rqp8_kg6kO0weJBLgQHAlD0lDocPaUvVQMs1n4bqtQwKSWg_QD02Q9024oo-PErAssQ_A_O4cfBABBKYXYBO7VIdT3ZMZa38AppiYccV1A_QRyV6VelCBKannTJwideDo-WUsmWIfXU2rYAQExydCOpxcOYw1OFxK9pNzEuiJ-hH6BKYVlMl4_RSC_kGvSJMKnkcWcEtQGblgZgxc4Zlp37zllVer7TlyhGmnXpXXyhUjmUWVm3yvhnWoX998Zq2rIiuWupaOzFDp-J9agQrLfPMT9k-SONLid1H0Lbd9cg1iORVNY0zsUT5kwI0g4rJGTDLBkg3MzqqR5vN-GtE8peqOdvadcG2UixUXmzb04FPS-q_oPELIlXdXaE8ueS2_9EGM_u9_iSdGc2i76lY-15EGSY95x5rs1CRO97OXjesbDgHsjkLW3_05HyzvuUSUQBedpyJpIcD5f5CcU6HVkc0wkb3Vu9dU36nH30KREblljpRoZW620zF63rz3Gq1A9swOsMzHKyE1q7rHOTIrQ5hchrEP5oGajCCDkAtuQ-z9EKydloWfc2k3DfB3MfgPhGpV7f9_cgDQLd1AFgRNaz4e76cR90BTEkJ4SpwPO6-jSVtTfP7gQhWp00NvKof6pkOzr3ibNs7VzyQuOpbPvaupMjHLh7hbBhIe12G2Vk838yr7Ra7md_LYDEr7g_GvPeuSUwMNMpcWTAX33C-c2QbiWWCQZv3fqAh3Q9vL2IfoT61jj5YFM5RWVjPUiBxeu-Sz3IbNuUSbxMLGnv9h9jmPDqsTUTUSXOsGYflcmyy9iVTyQsjHP2Fr_Q-z-dYeyKqLCMz5SM4aDs6ob558oDOamhEG2N1C4KW0WL1EJeZ0-OYfdErqU_zU0gpezmY1Foao1-5JVjoWplnToXCqfAj3cZ3gt9ZsaZJNRwCwEhHEcVokI6Smj_MyC82y89UQnocIF2lp67iq2RfP3z0rPy8StiPN–]

CNN: Perry Goes Home(UPDATED-Endorses Newt)

Thursday, January 19th, 2012

Going Home

USAToday is reporting that Rick Perry is suspending his campaign.  The Texas Governor is coming off of his best debate performance, but he was dealt some real set-backs after poor-than-expected performances in earlier debates.  Perry is the longest-serving Governor in Texas History, and his entry into the race last August was greeted by anticipation of a vigorous campaign.

Whatever else you might say about Perry, he certainly provided some moments of entertainment on the campaign trail, and in the debates, and not everything funny about what he said was at his expense.  I personally enjoyed when he took on Mitt Romney a little.

Update: National Journal is reporting that Perry will endorse Newt Gingrich

Good Night For Perry, Gingrich; Goodnight Ron Paul

Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

South Carolina

Perry had his best debate of the season, although to be fair, that’s not exactly saying a great deal, but he didn’t seem to fall asleep after the half-way mark, and he didn’t stumble through any lists, in part by avoiding them. Gingrich absolutely clobbered Juan Williams who looked like a man besieged as the crowd erupted into thunderous applause that went well beyond the cut to commercials according to people on the scene. Gingrich seemed to return to form, staying primarily positive, and taking on the media, including the noteworthy exchange with Juan Williams.  I’d be willing to say that on style as well as substance, you would be right to give the nod to Newt Gingrich as the “victor,” whatever that means in this context.

The replay of Williams being booed is worth it:


Ron Paul’s inability to articulate his views on national defense really hurt him Monday night, because when he stumbled and stammered a bit through one long answer(to which Perry aptly remarked he should have gotten “the gong”,) he seemed to lose track, and it showed he wasn’t as quick on the turnaround as most would hope, and while I think I understood what he was trying to say, it’s only because I’ve seen him say it more effectively and much more cogently before.  Tonight, he fell flat.

Rick Santorum gave a decent performance, and when he confronted Romney on the question of voting rights for paroled felons who had done their time, he came across as holding Romney’s feet to the fire.  Of course, you could see his set-up coming, but it worked, and Romney looked foolish in most respects on the issue, because in the end it was revealed that he did nothing while Governor to advance his stance, meaning it’s not a sincere position.  Romney came off sounding snide and petulant, and a bit arrogant too.

Speaking of Mitt Romney, as I pointed out in a blog posting Monday night, if he won’t tell us what’s in his tax return now, before we vote for him, there’s no reason on earth that we should. Period.  He gave a number of other well-rehearsed answers, but he really came across as plastic, as usual.  He really seemed under duress over the whole Tax Returns question, and with good reason.  Every voter in South Carolina and around the country should now be suspicious unless they simply like living under a rock.

All in all, I liked the debate only because it was less crowded and allowed for more full responses, and it was less littered by ridiculous questions formulated in some leftist dungeon.  As we get closer to the South Carolina primary, just a few days away, this will help generally because it was before a South Carolina crowd, and it revealed one particular thing about one candidate:  Mitt Romney doesn’t want his tax return filings out, and you and I know there must be a good reason for it. He got nervous, because there was a bit of blood in the water and he was happy to change the subject to anything else.  I think we need to put pressure on him on this point precisely.

A Challenge to Gingrich, Perry, Romney

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

Attacking or Governing Like Libs

A number of Republican candidates have begun to assail Mitt Romney on the basis of his time with Bain Capital, notably Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, but the criticisms they level miss the mark in most respects, and worse, play upon the very worst arguments of leftists who say capitalism is inherently evil because it seeks profit and will occasionally lead to short-term job losses.  I have no problem criticizing Mitt Romney when it’s deserved, as these pages witness, but I have definite problems with this approach to attacking Romney.  It’s not that he’s immune to attack, and as I have covered, not everything ever done under the banner of Bain is beyond reproach, but this idea that buying companies, and subsequently liquidating them to turn a profit is a bad thing is quite obviously not one of them.

I have some pointed advice for former Speaker Newt Gingrich, and my own Governor, Rick Perry of Texas:  If you want to criticize Mitt Romney, stick to those parts of his record where he actually did something wrong.  Don’t berate him with the same things Obama will use to appeal to  his base, but instead concentrate on those things that appeal to the conservative base.  In short, focus on how Mitt Romney governed.

It’s amazing when even Ron Paul defends Romney on this point, while Gingrich and Perry attack.  None but the ignorant who live in a capitalist nation should have a problem with the aspects of capitalism that seek profit, sometimes by liquidating assets.  That’s not altogether unlike you having a garage sale and getting rid of things you aren’t using, or that are not up to snuff any longer, trying to recover some of their value before they become effectively worthless.  The money you re-capture by such a sale certainly helps you to pay other bills, or buy new items that more fully suit one’s purposes.  You can take the cash and invest it in a completely new venture.  This is an important function in any market, including in business, and to besmirch it as somehow wrong is a terrible disservice to the entire notion of capitalism.

I can name a number of things that Mitt Romney has done while governor of Massachusetts that deserve more than a little derision.  The problem is that neither Gingrich nor Perry are apt to say much about them, since they’ve advocated or  implemented similar.   Gingrich formerly favored healthcare mandates, and while he’s reversed his position on that, it’s hard for him to take pot-shots at Romney on this basis without somebody pulling out the label “hypocrite.”  Perry pushed for his Gardasil vaccine, and that too is a mandate, though of a different character and scale, but both speak to the same basic problem Romney has, and it’s worthwhile to note that where Gingrich and Romney differ on the healthcare insurance mandate is this:  Only Mitt ever actually imposed one.

I have addressed Romney’s imposition of health-care mandates and the various other programs of a socialist nature he imposed while governor of Massachusetts, and it’s true that in terms of what he has actually enacted, he is certainly the most socialistic big-government-inclined politician of the bunch.  He is definitely the candidate the media will attack most vigorously for both his vices and his virtues, but it is disappointing to see Gingrich and Perry attack on this basis.  If they’re smart, they’ll stop it, but part of the problem is that they’re falling into a well-laid trap set by the mainstream media:  The media is left-biased in the extreme, so what Gingrich and Perry are doing is to pick up the criticisms that will travel farthest in the media.  The media loves these attacks, and will revisit them many times over if Romney gets the nomination, but the attacks conservative Republicans should be aiming at Mitt Romney are not things the overwhelmingly liberal media wants to attack.

Falling for this is a terrible mistake, because it will not be the liberal media that chooses the Republicans’ nominee.  Gingrich is right to point out that Romney’s Massachusetts healthcare plan is a terrible leftist disaster, and that Obamacare had been largely modeled after it.  Perry would be right to raise Mitt’s “Welfare Wheels” program, or any of the other big government ideas that advanced while Romney was governor there.  Either would make perfect sense explaining how Romney was a friend of Teddy Kennedy’s legislative agenda, or how Romney was the beneficiary of crony capitalism on a few occasions.  Nobody on the conservative side would be offended by that.  The problem is that both of them are vulnerable on similar issues, and while perhaps to lesser degrees, they still have some explaining to do.  The problem is that it’s all the easier to simply attack Romney from a point of view more appealing to leftists in part because the media will transmit that message more willingly, but also in part because they believe they will get away with it.

I’d issue this challenge to Governor Perry and Speaker Gingrich:  Tell us the things about Mitt Romney’s record that condemn him as a big-government statist, and those things that mitigate the timber in your own eyes on these issues, and we’ll get along famously.  I’d issue a further challenged to Governor Romney:  Be prepared to explain in some sensible terms why tyranny imposed at the Federal level is bad, but at the state level, it’s no problem at all.  His pathetic “federalism” excuse for  Romney-care doesn’t cut it, and never has.   Governor Romney can impress the hell out of me by explaining to the American people why capitalism is good, but then he’s going to need to explain why he undertook so many programs and laws as the governor of Massachusetts that did nothing but undermine it.

This has been the sick irony of this insufficient field. It’s why 58% of Republicans don’t really like any of these candidates.  Gingrich and Perry had better drop the politically expedient attacks that are merely anti-capitalist rants, and instead hammer on Romney for those things that were egregiously offensive to liberty, and they’d better prepare when questions are raised about their own big-government reflexes.  Otherwise, voters just might get wise to this whole sad game, and walk away from the party this fall. After all, what is worse?  A nominee like Romney who would effectively govern like Obama, or a nominee who relies upon Obama’s tired class-warfare and anti-capitalist rhetoric?  Neither do I want a nominee who subverts capitalism in governing, nor do I want one who assails it in the press.  We need a president who will undertake to restore capitalism, and I don’t see much evidence that any of these three will do so.

Bachmann Out, Perry Reassessing

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012


One Goes, One Stays, For Now...

Michele Bachmann is suspending her campaign while Rick Perry is said to be reassessing his, but he’s gone on to campaign in South Carolina. This is part of the inevitable process of winnowing the field, and the hand-writing has been on this particular wall for weeks.  Bachmann was clobbered by Perry’s entry, and a few gaffes, and she never regained traction.  Some of her critics say she tried to hard to be somebody she isn’t, but it’s certain that Bachmann will remain a popular figure in the conservative and Tea Party movements.  There’s no shame in it, and she should hold her head high as she returns to her Congressional duties full time.

Maybe she will now have some of the impetus required to wrangle with leadership over some more fiscally conservative legislation, that is so desperately needed in this current Congress.  Here’s wishing all the best to Representative Bachmann!

Rick Perry’s story is somewhat different.  Though he finished fifth, it’s safe to say that he’s got a bigger war-chest at the moment than Newt Gingrich, and he’s apt to put up one heck of a fight in South Carolina, where Gingrich is thought to have something of an advantage, being from neighboring Georgia.  Time will tell if Perry’s all finished, but the fact is that his debate performances have really set him back.  It’s hard to recover from the sort of public shellacking he’s taken over that sore topic, but one thing remains true about the Texas governor: He’s tenacious and he doesn’t go away quietly.  I expect him to remain something of a factor if he decides to stick it out, and with Bachmann gone, he will likely benefit from some of those who’ve now been left without a horse to ride in this primary race.

If Perry doesn’t turn things around substantially in South Carolina, money or not, I can’t see him staying much longer, so we may get an answer regarding his real electoral future soon.