Archive for the ‘News’ Category

The State Funeral Rush Limbaugh Deserves

Thursday, February 18th, 2021

A Man, a Legend, a Way of Life

I was a young veteran with a family. Times were tough in the economy, and troops were deployed and deploying to the vast desert of the Arabian peninsula. I was working a temporary contract job on Fort Hood, Texas, in support of the troops training to augment that deployment. Saddam Hussein had been delivered an ultimatum: Withdraw from Kuwait or be expelled forcibly. Everybody was monitoring the news, and in the field supporting the troops with spare gear and equipment in a rented truck, I tuned that truck’s radio(that had only the AM band) to find the latest information. There was this guy on the radio playing parody songs and talking politics, and one of those songs was a take on “Barbara Ann” the lyrics having been re-written into Bomb Iraq. It was entertaining and informative, and I’d never heard anything like it. Rush Limbaugh was leading the nation to support our troops, to buoy morale of the American people, and Democrats were busy telling America that the war, if it came, would result in the slaughter of tens or hundreds of thousands of American soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines.

The Democrats saw this as a revival of the discord of Vietnam. Rush Limbaugh saw it differently: He believed American might would steamroll Hussein and his forces. The media was, as ever, taking(or advancing) the Democrats’ narrative. The war began, and for a month, the reports of airstrikes rolled on, the reports of Iraqi fighter jets fleeing to Iran mounted, and when the ground war commenced, it was over almost before one could catch up with the news. It was a stunning victory, and in those days I learned something that was contrary to what the media propaganda had told me: America was great, and this guy on the radio, Rush Limbaugh, had been exactly right. For this alone, for his boundless confidence in the American servicemembers, Rush Limbaugh deserved a great honor. In all the years since, in his tireless support of America, he not only earned our respect, but has earned an honor the official government will never bestow. Rush Limbaugh deserves a state funeral on par with an American President, because in so many ways, and for so many people, in all the days spanning the period from the end of the Reagan Presidency to the inauguration of Donald Trump, Limbaugh had been conservative America’s presidency-in-exile, giving voice to a vast swath of America that was in a constant state of siege and disparagement by the Washington DC elite.

I had been raised in a union Democrat home, but through my years in the Army, I had begun to question the orthodoxy. Rush used humor as a means to entertain the audience while delivering serious information. As Rush would say in various forms over the years, the critical heart of humor is truth: There must be universal truth in a thing for it to be funny to the audience, or they won’t “get it.” In those days, Rush had various impromptu “updates” of various sorts and topics, with various songs and parodies as the introductory themes. This was delicious humor, and to listen to somebody on the radio skewering the sacred cows of the leftist mob was particularly entertaining. As a young guy at the time, it was all quite appealing. Rush was ever the defender of America, and when Japanese Parliament Speaker Yoshio Sakurauchi in January 1992 called America’s workers “lazy,” Rush had a single-sentence answer, posed as a question:

“We build a damn fine bomb, don’t we?”

The left shrieked. The political class in Washington DC gnashed its collective teeth. How dare Limbaugh say such a thing? Rush had intimated that the atomic bombs dropped on Japan were the hallmark of American creativity and productiveness, but more broadly, that the “lazy” American worker Yoshio Sakurauchi had criticized had kicked Japan’s Imperial ass all over the Pacific after the cowardly sneak attack at Pearl Harbor. Rush was right again, and he defended America’s history and unique culture as the greatest in human history. Rush believed in American exceptionalism, and he was its unabashed advocate for all the years he was on the radio. This should have earned Rush a state funeral, because more than any other American, he believed in America and sung her praises, recognizing her warts, but knowing that America is great because at its heart, “the people who make the country work” are the salt of the Earth, and the people who go about making it great by the aggregation of their tens of millions of individual efforts.

In truth, we could go through most of the events of the last thirty years and show how Rush Limbaugh had been the voice of a nation, who offered a counter-argument to the mainstream media, and had served as a proxy for the President we would have elected had we been a more sane, rational country. The problem has always been the advancing elements of the hard left, and Rush was ever there to warn us about their latest tricks, traps, and subterfuges. He really was on the cutting edge of societal evolution, and he held up the nation when we needed a voice of calm and sanity.

He single-handedly saved the AM band on radio, He created the genre that is talk radio. Certainly, there had been talkshows on the radio before, but it was mostly a bunch of drivel or interview-based shows. Rush built it. Now we enjoy hundreds of talk-shows, the AM band is far bigger in terms of daily listenership, and the statistics are quite clear: Rush made our modern world, and before these combined-platform news and information shows began to proliferate, there was Rush 24/7. He set so many trends, and showed the way forward in an industry that had been dying.

Steve Bannon said that Rush had been a bridge from Reagan to Trump. This is self-evident, but there’s more to it than this. He understood something I had missed. I think many of us missed it on the conservative side. In 2016, many conservatives gravitated to the candidacy of Ted Cruz. I had become a bit annoyed by Rush, because it was clear to me that he favored Trump. Like many conservatives, I didn’t understand why. Cruz seemed to be a genuine conservative, and while Rush didn’t demean Cruz, Rush went as far as to say that he(Rush himself) had never really been a “movement conservative.” That seemed to fly in the face of what Rush had been telling us for the decades we’d been listening. To a degree, I felt a little betrayed.

In the end, I grudging voted for Trump like so many conservatives who might have preferred a more doctrinaire conservative candidate. It wasn’t until some time after Trump’s inauguration that I finally realized what Rush had meant, and what he’d been telling us. Ted Cruz, for all his conservative positions, is just another politician, just one more creature of Washington DC. Yes, he’s better than most, but in the main, he’s revolved around DC and the DC set for much of his career. He certainly has better instincts for the grass roots of the conservatives, but I think that owes to the fact that Cruz is amazingly smart. What Ted Cruz isn’t is what America needed more desperately: Somebody who could win.

What Rush saw in Trump now, belatedly, makes perfect sense once you recognize the real, central issue, which I’d missed at the time: There’s no point having a putatively conservative candidate who is part of the UniParty oligopoly that has failed us repeatedly since 1988. In Trump, Rush saw an outsider who loves his country, warts and all, and who may not be a doctrinaire conservative, but because he comes from a place of common sense, would govern functionally as a conservative. More importantly, Trump had nothing personal to gain from the Presidency, except perhaps satisfaction in saving and restoring America. For the entirety of his presidency, Donald Trump donated his entire presidential salary. All of it. His presidency should rightly be viewed as a colossal gift to the American people. If not for the media, we’d have known this.

Rush was right. Always two steps ahead of the media and the political intelligentsia, Rush intuitively understood his role in American politics and culture. Every day, millions hung on his words. Every day, millions tuned into his show, and he formed an anchor for most talk stations’ lineups, but also for America. Rush loved life. Rush brought a whole back-bench of under-studies to America. He elevated them. He elevated us all. When I look back over the thirty years since I first heard his voice, I realize just how much Rush gave to us all. Every day, year after year, he kept me abreast of most of the things that mattered. He told conservative America how to fight. He offered entertainment and wisdom. He gave valuable insights from a value base so fundamental to what America is, and has been. Whether I live another week or decade, I will miss Rush for all days of my life, like a friend or an older brother. “What would Rush say?” He made us all smarter, and he made America immeasurably greater. Of all the politicians who’ve enjoyed the honors of official Washington DC in passing, none of them, save perhaps Ronald Reagan, had meant as much to our country as Rush Limbaugh. If there were true justice, all flags across this nation would for a week be at half-mast, and the parades in honor of Rush would speak to the triumph of a great life and great man who lived and fought with all his love for a nation that had scarcely deserved him.

 

 

Advertisements

Newsmax Joins the Suppression Crew

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2021

People need to see this stunning video of Newsmax treating Mike Lindell like garbage. I ditched FoxNews for this sort of thing. What makes Newsmax think they’re immune? I’m very glad I’ve been sticking to One America News. I always worried Newsmax was part of the “professional conservativing” establishment in DC. (Q: “What do you do for a living?”  A: “I conservative.”)

I’m adding this from Rumble, because I’ve had reports that the Youtube version of the video has been unavailable:


 

If this is how they treat Lindell, then you can imagine what they think of the rest of us. Newsmax just lost me. I don’t need cowardly news.

The Political Assassination of MAGA

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2021

Trial Behind Razor Wire – Capitol Remains Armed Camp for Unconstitutional Impeachment Trial

Next week, the United States Senate will take up the unconstitutional impeachment of a former office-holder. Their intention would seem to be to prohibit Donald Trump from holding political office again. While the impeachment itself is unconstitutional, the very punishment they seek is even more perverse. As bad as all of this is and seems, it’s also something still worse. The real object of this coming show trial is to permanently damage Donald J. Trump in the eyes of the world and the American people, and with him, all the people who have and continue to support him. This is a broad attack on political speech, and a despicable attempt to gin-up emotions against a former president with two purposes. The first is to simply and permanently politically damage him, since they strongly suspect they cannot get to the 67 vote threshold to convict him. The second is to defame his supporters as domestic terrorists and insurrectionists. It’s not merely about making sure that Trump is never foolish enough to seek office again, but to see to it that those who supported him will never have a political voice again. In part then, this is about the future of Donald Trump, but more critically, this is about the future of the country and how they intend to gain submission of a nation. This is a mass political assassination, of a President, and of 75 million(plus) Americans. While Trump will be named, you will be tried and convicted in absentia.

First, let us cover the technical facts. The constitution makes plain that an impeachment has two objects, and that they are not separable:

“Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States: but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.” — US Const Art I., Section 3 (emphasis added in red)

I call your attention to the word “and.” This is not an either-or proposition. This is specifically a matter of one unified punishment for high crimes and misdemeanors, and the word “and” here means these two remedies (removal and prohibition from holding future offices) are inseparable. One cannot simply say “well, he’s out of office, so we’re just going to prohibit him from holding the office again.” It doesn’t work that way. The use of the word “and” in this context makes it plain.

Second, to the legitimacy of the whole procedure, consider the following:

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” — US Const Art II, Section 4 (emphasis added in red)

Who is the President? It is currently Joe Biden. Unless the Democrats wish to admit that they stole the election and that Donald J. Trump is still the legitimate President of the United States, it is impossible to impeach and remove Donald J. Trump from the Presidency because he is not the President. The United States has exactly one President at any one time. Therefore, nothing about this impeachment is constitutional, and that fact is why even Chief Justice Roberts, constitution-murderer that he is, recognizes that he cannot preside over the impeachment trial of a man who is no longer President.

Again, referring to the constitution:

“The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present.” — US Const Art I, Section 3 (emphasis added in red)

The Democrats are arguing that Senator Leahy shall preside, and that this is okay since Trump is no longer President, but if Trump is no longer President, then they have no authority to impeach, try, or in any way molest private citizen Donald J. Trump.

This should be enough to understand why this whole procedure is and must be adjudged entirely unconstitutional. This is a legal, constitutional farce, and frankly, the people carrying this forward are acting as actual enemies of the United States.

This is the obvious answer to this entire hoax of an impeachment. What makes all of this dangerous, however, is what they are going to use this opportunity to do in the political realm. It is intended to divide the American people even more deeply, and to damn roughly one-half of the electorate as insurrectionists and terrorists, i.e., domestic enemies. The idea being advanced is that the people who carried out the debacle at the Capitol on January 6th were representative of seventy-five million(plus) Americans who support Donald Trump. The notion is to create such a hew and cry against Donald Trump that if ever he seeks office again, they will place first an obstacle of illegitimacy before him, and secondly, they will associate all those who would seek to again elect him as terrorists.

This is a danger far in excess of the perverse and wholly unconstitutional impeachment trial to be carried out next week. As bad as it is, and as constitutionally laughable as it may be, the trial will be used as a platform to try MAGA in absentia. You will not be defended. You will have no voice in the US Senate. Their presiding officer, Senator Patrick “Leaky” Leahy, will undoubtedly rule any arguments out of bounds. This will be a show trial of epic proportions, intended to defame and diminish you. This is about expunging Donald Trump from the history of the United States, and with him, all those who supported his election and presidency. Those who raised questions about the legitimacy of the completely fraudulent election of November 2020 will be adjudged as guilty of a form of treason, but without the ability to answer, refute, or in any way defend against the charge. There will be no manner by which you will be given a voice, and the handfull of RINOs who will support this exercise hate you just as much as they hate Donald Trump.

The only recourse remaining to you, having been silenced and squelched in social media, and having been derided and defamed in the so-called mainstream media will be to ring the phones and fill the inboxes of every US Senator, of either party, and to let them know that you will remember their conduct with this show trial and railroading of MAGA. That’s what this is, after all, and it’s intended to wipe you from the American political landscape. Joe Biden is not long for the presidency. His rapidly declining mental capacity is becoming dangerously apparent, and the media is having difficulty concealing it, so that I expect by late summer, or certainly by this time next year, Kamala Harris, a wholly unlikable political prostitute, will be thrust upon us as the President of the United States. The Democrat/DeepState program of wrecking the United States is resuming apace, and left unchallenged, we will absolutely lose our country. The political assassination of MAGA, both Trump and his supporters, is intended to eliminate the opposition when she runs for re-election in 2024, giving Democrats the ability to finalize the destruction. Welcome to the Great Reset.

MAGA 2021: Choosing the Road Ahead

Thursday, January 21st, 2021

Victory is the only choice

There is a time for choosing, and I’m going to lay it all out. The Republican party has done, as my friend and long time commenter “The Unit” asserts: Hit the eject button, rather than squeeze the trigger. This is why we nominated Trump to begin with: Spineless, ineffective, weaselly Republicans who would rather assume the position and take it rather than fight. Ladies and gentlemen, that’s what we have in our Republican Party, and like so many of you, I am inclined to simply wash my hands of them and let the Republican Party burn. It would be so satisfying. It would be wonderful to spit in their eyes and walk the Hell away. Who among us would not love to give Mitch McConnell the old double-barreled middle finger and tell him to shove off? While that would all be very satisfying, the satisfaction wouldn’t last as we will see the disaster these people will make of our country. That’s unacceptable, and while a third party is very enticing, there are problems with that approach. Let’s think very carefully about what we do next, make our decisions in the full knowledge of the costs, and then go do it. Talk is cheap, but the time for action has come. Let us choose our course knowing what offers any hope of success, and what is doomed to failure or worse. It’s our country, and it’s our party, so let us decide its disposition.  The 2022 primaries begin today.

The first option is the easiest of all: We can do nothing, but simply walk away in frustration and despair. That is the road to serfdom of a sort for which fools like AOC and Ilhan Omar only dare to dream. That road is littered with the wreckage of our lives, and the lives of our children and grandchildren. It will end with our country in squalor and destitute slavery to the Chinese Communist Party and their “elite” pet American politicians.  I find that to be a grotesquely unacceptable course. I will not be driven from politics. I will not be driven from the public square. I will not let these psychopathic lunatics turn my country into grist for their communist mill of death. I will not become another conforming slave, unwilling to state my opinions and principles to the knowing of the world. I can’t do that. I won’t do that. Neither should you.

The second option is to cast off the Republican Party, abandoning it to the losers and RINOs and NeverTrumpers. The idea would be to start a new party, a patriot party, a MAGA party, or some such thing that we could decide. That sounds great, but it’s been tried, and it never works. Why not? The answer is simple, and most of you already know it: The system is thoroughly rigged to make sure a third party will fail. First, the laws are established to favor the existing two parties. At the local, state, and federal levels, obstacles are placed in the way of new parties and non-party independent candidates that make it very difficult, in some cases virtually impossible, to circumvent the existing two-party oligopoly. While I would love to see that changed, the truth is that it will never be changed from outside the two-party system. They have it all stitched-up quite tightly, and they know it. That’s why they don’t mind when we get angry and go off in search of a third party. They know we can’t get around them in any significant way. Ross Perot discovered this with his ill-fated Reform Party. This is why Trump ran as a Republican, and not as a third-party candidate. His successes should be our guide, but so should his failures, and there were several. Dan Bongino did a great job explaining this in his reference to the ill-fated but much-recalled Bull Moose Party of Teddy Roosevelt. Here it is, from Rumble(Fast-forward to the 57:00 mark to get to the point directly):

The third option is perhaps the most difficult, but it’s also the only plausible way to accomplish what we actually want. It will require something to which many of us are not accustomed, and I am going to tell you the truth about it whether or not you wish to know it. The most probable method to achieve our desire is to create a new party within the Republican Party, but in a way that permits us to take over the machinery of the party from top to bottom. This is going to be difficult, butd if you actually want to do it, we’re going to have to get off our asses and do more than go to rallies. It’s going to require that we do what the Tea Party did, times ten. We’re going to need to start at the bottom, develop candidates, and take control of the party from the bottom, moving upward. What Trump did was a decapitation attack on the party, and it worked, but the problem is that he didn’t build the organization he needed to take it over from the bottom up. Getting people to rallies is great, because it get voters to polls, but that doesn’t give you control of the party at the local and state levels, which is where elections are won and lost.

Let me explain: Why did Trump lose* in 2020? They stole it. How did they steal it? Well, they used all the ordinary methods, but they got away with it. How did they get away with it? In the seven to ten locations most critical to their steal, they took control of the election law and machinery. They exploited weak, weaselly Republicans, like the Speaker of the House in Pennsylvania, the Governors and Secretaries of State in Arizona and Georgia, and a whole string of weak-kneed Republicans in the affected states. They also owned the States’ courts, either with outright leftists, or with a combination of leftists and  RINO Republicans. The biggest key to this election theft was not just pallets of ballots, and suitcases of ballots, but the legal chicanery that permitted them to occur. The mail-in fraud was the biggest part of their theft, using the lack of signature verification, the curing of ballots, and all the rest of the rigged laws and dicta. This permitted them to simply rubber-stamp fraudulent ballots in a massive way. Having a few well-placed dirtbags in Republican drag was indispensable. Mitch McConnell assisted the steal, as did any number of other establishment Republicans. They wanted Trump gone. Without loyal Trumpists at the local-level and state-level providing a safeguard of the law, there was no backstop. Yes, he got more legitimate votes than Joe Biden, but as you know too well by now, the issue comes down to Stalin’s line about who counts the vote rather than who casts them. In this case, however, it came down to the more fundamental question about under which conditions ballots could be cast and subsequently counted and validated. Yes, of course they stole this election, and it’s as plain as the nose on your face, but left without the ability to prove it, the audit trail having been effectively(or in some cases literally) erased, there is no remaining way to prove it in a timeframe that won’t make the argument all but moot. It was almost the perfect crime, inasmuch as while it might be able to be proven in some substantial instances at this late date, do you think there’s any way to reverse the election after the new President is inaugurated?

The only way this is ever fixed, if ever, is to seize control of one of the parties and reform it from the bottom up. Part of me, the vengeful part, wants almost to go after the Democrat Party, take it over, and wreck it, and turn it into our party. Can you imagine a Democrat party in which AOC is an outcast? Can you imagine a Democrat Party in which the likes of Chuck Schumer is a marginalized nutjob who can’t win a primary? Wouldn’t that be glorious? Okay, enough of the fantasy. Time to get back to work. Let’s start this way, if you’re serious. I want you to find out who runs the Republican Party in your county. I want you to find out who is on their committees. I want you to show up at the next meeting. Sit quietly and watch what goes on. Learn how they operate. Get together with others. Wear some item of significance to show others of like mind who you are. Become insurgents at the local level, and take over the local party. To do this is not easy, but it’s also not impossible. Once you do this, begin cultivating local candidates, and start working toward putting forward State Representatives and Senators. Take over city councils and school boards. Take over the State Party. Take over the legislature. Rid yourselves of RINO governors. While you’re at it, work to reform laws so that third parties can get a start, so that if your progeny ever find themselves in a similar situation, they have a path to a viable third party. I want you to notice that in just four years, the Tea Party was able to field candidates and drive the agenda of the Republican Party. The problem is that they permitted themselves to be isolated and ultimately marginalized. If you tackle this, in order to avoid that kind of separation, you’ll need to avoid the labels the establishment folk and media will try to assign you. You need to insist, since it’s true, that you represent the mainstream of the Republican Party. In fact, that ought to be your label, if you take one at all: We are the mainstream Republicans. Full stop. It’s our party, and we own it, fund it, and supply the vast majority of the votes for its candidates. It’s time for us to run it.

The problem we face is that the existing two parties are thoroughly corrupt. They’ve formed a sort of oligopoly in which you can do business with one, or the other, but you must pick one or suffer the consequences. While you’re working to wrest control of local and state party organs, keep an eye on the Federal stooges. They’ll be up to no good, looking to consort with the left any chance they get. Why? Because that’s how they maintain their power in DC. That’s how they get along. That’s how they keep getting re-elected. We need to purge these RINOs from the party. We need to impel these people to fight to the degree we can, because we’re in for one Hell of a couple of terms. We’re going to need to start now. The primaries will already be going for Congressional and State elections this time next year. We need to be thinking now about the primaries in 2021. This is a good first opportunity to test our mettle.  You can walk away in dejection and despair, or you can stand to fight.  If you stand to fight, you must decide whether you will vest your efforts in an almost hopelessly implausible effort to create a third political party, or whether you will simply take over the machinery that already exists. I’ve given this a great deal of thought, and although part of me screams that we’ve been here before, and it’s hard, the truth is that forming another party and making it electorally viable on the Presidential stage is not something likely to be achieved in my lifetime.  I have always voted Republican, and I’ve always funded its causes and candidates. That makes me an owner in this enterprise, and I fully intend to exercise my rightful control. I fervently hope you will join me. It’s time for you non-party independents to join in too. The truth is that you voted with us for the same reasons, and that means you tend to share our values. It’s time now to stand for them, before we lose it all.

MAGA!

 

DC Lockdown: Securing the Coup

Tuesday, January 19th, 2021

The First Order of Business

In any successful coup d’etat, the first rule is to secure it. Once the coup-plotters have successfully wrested control of a government, their first exigency is always to stabilize the coup, making it irreversible, followed by a rapid consolidation of power. What you’re witnessing in Washington DC is precisely that. The radical globalists, in the USA represented by the Democrats and a throng of Republican collaborators, is now out to secure their victory.  They succeeded in stealing the 2020 election from Donald Trump, and they’re on the cusp of fully taking power. The show of force in Washington DC is all about making a show that will frighten away any who foolishly conceive of some effort to undo it.  They’ve already introduced legislation to make the new walls and barriers permanent, as they scramble to turn the DC capitol into the visible demonstration of their power. They need to appear invincible, but one of the things they’re likely observing is Sun Tzu’s dictum to “Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.” Their coup is fragile, and they know it. One bad meme, one unexpected push in the wrong direction, and the whole thing will come undone in the eyes of the public. This is all about enforcing an image and narrative of inevitability and invincibility, because their legitimacy is so thoroughly in question. The media, another organ of the coup-plotters, is only too anxious to help portray this image. They too are on the ragged edge, because all the world knows or ought to know that the media is entirely fake.  Everything you’re seeing in media is aimed at securing the coup and consolidating its power.

Joe Biden is likely barely aware of anything. That’s not his role. He’s a figurehead and a fake. The people running him, Obama et al, are busy concocting the most absurdly vicious administration in US history. Staffed with professional liars and BigTech executives, the whole administration is being engineered to carry out a giant fraud. This is because their entire bogus campaign, barely a campaign at all, was comprised of disinformation, propaganda, and a never-ending attack on Donald Trump.  Expect this to continue.  Donald Trump will still be the bogeyman, only now, it will be a blame game. Everything they do will be blamed on Trump and his administration, despite the fact that Trump’s accomplishments were remarkable. None of that will matter once these demons take over the reins of power. Instead, you’ll be told how horrible Trump had been. They’ll tell you he’d been ineffective or incompetent, or even malevolent when it suits their purposes. While some of that happens in most administrations, in this one, it will be taken to a new level previously unknown and unimaginable. That is because Donald Trump accomplished many good things for the American people, and the Obiden administration will be taking a wrecking ball to all of it.

They will focus on maintaining the air of invulnerability, as they hope time will make people simply accept their legitimacy. In a sense, they hope with each passing day, the reality of Obiden’s presidency will reinforce itself.  First, some will simply shrug and accept it and try to move on with life in whatever way they’re able, and over time, they will shut down and deplatform any one who says otherwise.  They will not, as you’ve seen, allow for any more questioning of the legitimacy of the election, while at least 8 in 10 Republicans and 4 in 10 independents believe the election was stolen, corrupt, Worse, some number of Democrats, mostly biting their tongues, also believe that the election was stolen. This means that at the margins at least, the theft was so obvious that even some of their own number can’t un-see the evidence. This is why even at this late date, it’s being reported in the press(consider source) that Barr told the President that election theft was Bullsh…” They’re trying to bury it, and they’re trying to legitimize Obiden.

Part of consolidating power is what will be made of Barr’s interview on ITV. This is because to truly consolidate their coup, they must take Trump out. In this case, what they intend to do is to make sure Trump can never hold office again, and they’re going to use an unconstitutional impeachment trial in the Senate. That’s the purpose of the Barr interview. I, along with many of my readers, had serious reservations about the “swampiness” of Bill Barr, and since the election, he’s substantiated that concern. You can also look to the pressure being placed on social media tyrants to become more tyrannical in their stifling of conservatives, and particularly any talk about the legitimacy of the 2020 election. They’re demolishing conservatives, and any pro-Trump voices for a purpose, and they’re being driven by the left toward further attacks. This consolidation will continue apace, as they intend to wipe out all dissent. There can be no voices in media anywhere. They’re going after podcasters, and even talk radio. At every turn, the object is to shut down any further questioning of the elections of 2020.

Obiden can’t have a successful return to the Obama policies if his legitimacy is in question. Now, all efforts are being placed into the drive to cancel any such questioners. The American people, though, know what they know, and these efforts may shut down the public discussion, but they won’t silence what reverberates in the minds of the American people. Get ready. Know what you’re seeing. This is exactly how any coup d’etat behaves, because it must. The legitimacy is always in question, and ending those questions is key to securing the coup. The populace must be made to accept the legitimacy, and that requires eliminating all questions and/or questioners.

Editor’s Note: Yes, I’m using the term “Obiden,” in part as recognition that this is an entirely fake presidency, but mainly that Obama is largely directing it from behind the scenes. Joe Biden is incapable of being President of the United States. His only role was to be an eligible non-corpse they could put atop the ticket as a placeholder. Right now, your best source for information is Steve Bannon’s War Room, broadcast on America’s Voice from 10am-Noon and 5pm-6pm(EST). You can also catch it on Rumble.

Joe Biden: The Fake President

Saturday, January 16th, 2021

Fake President: The Man is Fake but the Power is Real

Sadly, it appears that unless Nature or Nature’s God intervenes, Joe Biden will be inaugurated the 46th President of the United States. He’s bringing with him a truckload of Obama and Clinton administration retreads, some of whom are the most despicable characters.  All of this is possible only because the Democrats were able to successfully steal their way into the White House by corrupting the election laws in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and probably others too. Without these perversions of election law, their mail-in ballot scam wouldn’t have been possible, and Joe Biden would now be preparing to watch the second inauguration of Donald Trump, but there’s more to all this than just the naked election theft. Seventy-five million Americans know they’ve been thoroughly cheated, and no small number of independents and conservative Democrats are among that number. Joe Biden knows, as do all those in his circle, that this will be the most tenuous presidency in history, in part owing to his own declining fitness for the office, but also to the fact that roughly half or more of the electorate knows he didn’t earn it. Just like they’ve built a counterfeit America with which to baffle and bamboozle you, now they shall cap it all off with their crowning achievement: A Fake President.

Of course he’ll be vested with the powers of the presidency, but don’t think for one moment that they’ll actually let him wield them.  Instead, the actions of the Biden administration will be decided in a sort of committee of BigTech oligarchs, political hacks, and of course, the Obama directives, originating from on high with the blessings of George Soros and the rest of the Great Reset coup-plotters.  Yes, this is Barack Obama’s third term, after a fashion, and it will continue the weaponization of the law against all of their selected enemies.  Blue collar? Enemy. Republican? Enemy. Conservative? Enemy. Vaguely populist activist? Enemy. Actual journalist(an admittedly rare commodity?) Enemy. Trump? Voodoo doll standing in as the effigy for their enemies. Small business owner? Enemies. Red states? Enemies. Their enemies list is consistent. They hate anybody opposed to their agenda, and they’re going to be using all the instrumentalities of government to demolish them. They’ve recruited BigTech, BigBank, BigMedia, and BigScreen along with BigEducation and BigLabor to carry out their war against you.

After promising to be a President for all Americans, Biden has already abandoned that rhetoric in favor of condemning all Trump supporters as Nazis and racists. Naturally, there’s more to his fakery than mere campaign rhetoric. Enter Biden’s Fake First Family. Here is a rogue’s gallery of frauds, cheat, thieves, liars, hucksters and perverts that the media has worked overtime to conceal from your eyes. First, there’s his wife Jill, who was previously married to Joe Biden’s friend, who for the sake of power was willing to cheat on her then-husband and also later lead increasingly demented Joe around like a child. She’ll do anything for power, and her attachment to being called “Doctor” is just one more piece of the falsity rampaging in this family. She was awarded a Doctor of Education in Education Leadership from the University of Delaware, which means it’s just so much gobbledygook. It’s another of those fake credentials invented to impress on one’s resume, but gives no evidence of any useful skill, and does not, in my view, earn the title of address: “Doctor.” Based on television interviews to date, it’s apparent that she’s as vacuous as Joe himself, and her earlier moral failings don’t seem to support all of the reverence with which the media lavishes her.

Then there’s James Biden. From all available reports, this guy is a life-long grifter. Then there’s the son, Hunter with his drug addictions, his fraud, his global grifting schemes, and all the rest. Then there’s his preference for pornography, including images of children. The whole family is corrupt, and it’s like a Mafia operation. For the last decade or more, the FBI has been burying the evidence of this man and his family’s ribald corruption and criminal activity. More, Barack Obama has been using Joe Biden as a sock-puppet. There is nothing real about this Biden Presidency except for the power it will wield. That will be a terror upon the American people, out of scale and proportion to anything we’ve ever seen. As they are hurriedly turning Washington DC into an armed camp to install this fake presidency, you are losing your nation.

Thugs funded by Soros are making plans to attack Americans at these inauguration week events.

They are going to carry out more “false flag” operations of the sort we saw on January 6th at the Capitol. You may have noticed, as they turn the nation’s capital into this “Green Zone” that they’re erecting walls and fences. Finally then, an admission to what we’ve known for a long time: Walls work! Of course, now they’re to be aimed at you. The militarization of the capital should be the final evidence you need to know that this fake presidency is being created, inaugurated, and will be maintained by force, since the consent of the governed was never a consideration.

All Americans should steer clear of this and other events around the country before and during the national calamity that is this phony presidency. You must not put yourselves or your families in harm’s way because the soldiers are armed, and their weapons are loaded, and they have rules of engagement more lethal than any the Obama era DOD ever permitted in Afghanistan. At the first sign of trouble, they will unleash Hell upon American citizens, and they mean it. STAY AWAY! Don’t go near this travesty disguised as an inauguration. It bears no actual resemblance to an American inaugural celebration, but instead to the installation of a foreign puppet over a vanquished, occupied nation. That is what it is, in fact.

Language warning for the following:

https://twitter.com/MermanEthal/status/1350257893598244865

Worse is coming. Even now, they are planning to create more COVID faux crises, and I expect to finally hear about what Arch-Bishop Vigano termed COVID-21. That’s right, they’re going to COVID us to death:

Meanwhile, the State Department has released information indicating what we’ve known for some time: COVID was an engineered creation of the Wuhan Lab.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1350303845516275713

BigTech is fulfilling its role as a firewall against “dangerous thought, information, and opinion.” They banned journalist Raheem Kassam of The National Pulse and Steve Bannon’s War Room, all in an effort to prevent him from expressing dangerous thoughts. They banned him from Twitter for the tweet below:

You didn’t elect Joe Biden. America didn’t elect him. He was foisted upon us, but his powers will be real, no matter how illegitimate was his “election.” With Joe Biden will come the advent of Counterfeit America, a communist regime in which speech is throttled or banned, BigTech dominates your choices and existence, and your political expressions will be used to confine and punish you. If “war is Hell,” then welcome to Dante’s inferno, because this war is against you, and you will submit to the fake president, this totem named Joe Biden, as the puppet-masters animate him to the delight of the elite.

 

Impeaching America: The Vengeance War Against You

Wednesday, January 13th, 2021

Political Crucifixion Aimed At Trump Supporters

As I write, the House of Representatives is debating the second impeachment of President Trump, but the matter is deeper than this. Yes, they’re using the concocted justification that he’s being impeached for inciting an insurrection, or some such hogwash, but the truth is that President Trump is to be martyred in our name, in the manner that Jesus was persecuted and ultimately crucified for the sins of man. I am not comparing Donald Trump to Jesus, but the process by which he is being persecuted, prosecuted and punished serves the same purpose, and in the same way that Christians came to understand that Jesus has been the sacrificial lamb who was crucified on their behalf, you should know that the left now persecuting Donald Trump will not be sated with his demise. Instead, they will be coming for you as well. They already are. What do you think the entire BigTech Cyber Coup is about? Do you think that it’s about Donald Trump? Do you think any of this is about Donald Trump? Don’t be foolish. This is about their desire for vengeance against you. Donald Trump is just their voodoo doll. The pins with which they’re sticking him are intended to rend your hearts. The liberties they take from him in the clear, writ large, are being repeated hundreds of thousands of times over in your own social media accounts, at your jobs, your banks, and all the rest. They’re using Donald Trump as the totem, but you’re the object.

Another similarity to the crucifixion of Jesus lies in this: Jesus was guiltless. Similarly, President Trump has no guilt for inciting anything. In fact, it’s not entirely clear that it was possible for him to have incited a riot that actually had commenced before his speech had concluded. All of his words indicated he wanted peaceful protest. He wanted people to cheer for the Congressmen and women who were upholding the interests of the electorate. More than this, however, the truth is that after five years of accusations of every sort hurled at him, he’s never been found guilty of anything except being a loud and vulgar man at various times in his life.

Again, Donald Trump is not Jesus, or anything like him in person or mindset, obviously, but that’s not the point: This is the same process. Jesus was crucified not merely to punish Jesus, but to scare away his adherents. In the same way, this purge is being launched to punish Trump’s supporters. They’re trying to punish Trump supporters for our beliefs.  If this were simply about punishing Trump, that’s what they’d do, and leave it there.  Instead, we are seeing a culture-wide attack on Trump, his supporters and surrogates, all with the notion of separating him from them in such a way that America First, Make America Great Again, and any remnant of his movement are demolished. This is a war. It’s not a war about Trump, but a war against you. Understand that Donald Trump is being martyred(politically only, for now,) as a warning to you.

They want to strip his future secret service protection from him. That’s intended to make a real martyr of him.

This is no time for Americans to remain silent. It is not time to behave as Peter before the rooster crowed.  You must let all of Washington DC hear you, and hear you now. After they’ve had their way with Trump, they’ll be coming for you. It’s time for this vengeance war to end now, and that means putting an end to this political crucifixion. That will only be done with your loud and unrelenting voice. Violence will only further their fervor. You must make yourselves heard.

Amazon Hit-and-Run: Bezos’ BigTech Bigots Kick Parler Off Platform

Saturday, January 9th, 2021

Free Speech Hit-and-Run

Effective at midnight Sunday, Amazon is kicking Parler.com off of their hosting platform. From John Matze, founder and CEO of Parler:

Statement by Parler CEO John Matze

 

I don’t care what anybody says: This crosses a big bright red line. I want all of you small companies, local governments, and everybody else out there to understand what’s happening, and also to understand that THIS COULD BE YOU. I know lots of small businesses that use Amazon’s web-hosting services, and it’s always a bad idea. One of the technical problems we’ve seen is that they’re subject to move your server all over the place, changing your website’s IP address, and relying upon DNS updates(which take time to propagate) and they don’t care if your website or service is down for a while as they juggle things around within or among their server farms. I’d urge everybody who uses Amazon hosting to abandon them, and fast. Imagine if you’ve got some critical application you’re hosting for your business in Amazon’s cloud. What happens when Amazon gets mad at you? What happens when they decide THEY want to sell whatever product/service you’re currently selling, and they simply poach your data, and your customer lists? Jeff Bezos is infamous for running a predatory outfit, but this is just on the hosting side. I know Amazon is convenient. That said, I’m done with them. As of today, I’m not buying a pack of Twinkies from that jerk-off. I don’t care if he’s the last Hostess outlet on the planet. Abandon Amazon. The only power we have is as consumers and entrepreneurs is to walk with our cash. That’s it. Amazon Prime? Gone. Fire? Gone. I don’t care about any of these jerks. They don’t sell anything I can’t live without, and happily. Government may not do a freaking thing about these tyrants, but WE CAN.

Parler anticipates being down up to a week as they build out their own server farm. To be honest, I don’t know why they didn’t anticipate this, but then again, who expects a corporation to act like the Soviet Union? I DO. In 2008, we learned some banks had become “too big to fail.” What we should learn now is that some corporations have become too big for their britches. It’s time to be the economic iceberg that sinks some of these Titanics.

How to permanently delete your Amazon account.

Representative Admits Insiders May Have Invited Protesters Into Capitol

Saturday, January 9th, 2021

Blabbermouth Lets Cat Out of Bag

This is what I’ve been reporting since Wednesday, when it became readily apparent based on available videos that Capitol Police seemed to invite protesters into the Capitol. This doesn’t excuse anybody who made entry elsewhere or broke windows and other forms of hooliganism, but this seems to go a long way in explaining why so many people may have gone into the Capitol, unthinkingly following the herd, and unaware they were doing anything wrong or that they shouldn’t have been there. If they went to the door of a government building, and police officers open the door to let them in, have they knowingly done something illegal? See the whole report here at JustTheNews. According to this report, Congresswoman Debbie “Blabbermouth” Wasserman-Schultz(D-FL) said:

“Then we also have to make sure that we answer the questions about how some of the things that happened on Wednesday could have happened without there being inside assistance because I hate to say that, I pray to God that is not what happened, but there were some actions taken that you can’t just imagine how they happened without some kind of permissiveness occurring.”

This tends to mitigate much of this “angry mob” narrative, doesn’t it? I can’t imagine how this happens without somebody high up in the Capitol Hill police force knowing it, authorizing it, and telling officers to facilitate it. That fact should immediately put egg on the faces of everybody from Nancy Pelosi to Mitch McConnell to the mainstream media, not to mention the throng of leftists calling all Trump supporters “domestic terrorists” and other such nonsense. More, this tends to shoot a giant hole in the entire “incitement” narrative being hurled at President Trump. In the video below, posted on Twitter, it appears that protesters were invited and ushered inside by Capitol Police. This same thing may have occurred at multiple entrances. Certainly, we need to know who ordered this effective stand-down and breach of security by Capitol Police, and motives need to be immediately investigated.

Lindsey Graham Gets the Just Recognition He Deserves (Video)

Friday, January 8th, 2021

One More DC Dirt-Bag

I never advocate violence on this site, even when these scumbags in DC really anger me. Given the way the Republican Party has treated Donald Trump over the last four years, misrepresenting us, betraying us, and otherwise sabotaging the President we elected, they should never be permitted to walk down the streets without being shamed for the dirtbags they are. None of them. All of these dirtbag insiders now abandoning the President and otherwise continuing this coup against Donald Trump that’s never stopped over the course of four years, and has always had the nodding support of the Republican establishment must find themselves dealt with by us in a non-violent but aggressively loud manner wherever they go. This goes back to McCain calling the Tea Party “Hobbits” and all the other contempt the McConnell crowd offered to citizens rising up to complain. This includes the consultancy and think-tank class with their bottomless pit of haughty, smarmy, dripping revulsion at we “Deplorables.”

This isn’t about Donald Trump. I have some things to say about him that I will get to in due course, but not now. I’m not going to abandon the man on the field while all of these closet corrupto-crats go scurrying off the ship, damning him as they go. No sir. Instead, from here on out, I’m going to give them the just recognition they deserve, to the extent they deserve it.

That’s almost every Republican in the US Senate, most of the Republican Governors(with just a few noteworthy exception already well-known to you,) and a goodly proportion of the Republicans in the House. There are also all the members of the Federal judiciary who failed to uphold the constitution, many of whom we fought to see seated, who must be similarly treated. This must never end, so long as they remain in office/power. Here is this despicable weasel, Lindsey Graham(R-SC,) escorted by a squad of police for whom WE PAY while mostly blissfully ignoring the protests blooming around him(Explicit Language):

https://twitter.com/iheartmindy/status/1347616155394043904

Can anybody tell me why Twitter feels obliged to slap these stupid, dishonest warnings on tweets? At this point, it’s like a CLICK MAGNET.

Of course, this says nothing of our overt enemies. Their time to face our contempt and derision is nigh, too.

It also includes all the media bastards, all of the various local officials, and from this day forward, none of these people need to be able to walk down the street without scorn and derision loudly heaped upon them.

These people think we’ll back down. That’s NOT happening.

To buttress that point, Mr. L(Explicit Language):

 

Has Andrew McCarthy Lost His Mind?

Friday, January 8th, 2021

This NeverTrumper never seems to tire of putting the most absurdly anti-Trump spin on every issue, always finding fault with President Trump, even when Donald Trump is the obvious victim of clear crimes, as he was in the entire Russia hoax. In this case, he’s gone over the edge in his NeverTrumping that there’s frankly never a time when any person ought to offer me anything this guy has to say as some sort of valid opinion. He may be a former federal prosecutor, but I remind myself that he worked at the Southern District of New York, and that in the last few years, that office has seemed to have been overrun by leftists and NeverTrumpers, such that it’s clear that no justice is to be had there, whatever it may say over the door. Here is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever seen one of these NeverTrumpers tweet:

After this, there’s nothing Andrew McCarthy can ever say that I will view with anything but contempt.

Unarmed, Apparently Non-Violent, Ashli Babbit Killed

Friday, January 8th, 2021

Why Was She Killed?

There is no explanation of the video below that would seem able to make this a necessary shooting, and I’m hardly alone in that assessment. She shouldn’t have been there, and was violating the law, but looking at the situation in its totality, I don’t know how this can be justified.  I want to know the identity of the shooter.  I want to see this investigated just like every other police-involved shooting.  There’s something “off” here.  I’m trying to imagine how this shooting is justifiable. I want to understand the thinking of the shooter at the time of the event. I want to know what his frame of mind and frame of reference was when he pulled the trigger.  She doesn’t appear to be an immediate threat to anybody in the video clip below. There were officers right behind her, and she appeared not to be posing a threat to them, and in fact had her back to them, so I don’t understand the necessity of shooting her. What threat did she pose that required lethal force?  Who is the shooter? Again, it’s a given that she shouldn’t have been there, but this doesn’t seem like a justifiable shooting. It doesn’t. Whose life was she threatening? I don’t get it. If the justification of lethal force is only to thwart lethal or potentially lethal threats, on its face, she didn’t seem to have been one.

I also notice that the shooter seemed to have been in plain clothes. Was he part of a protective detail?  Did Babbit unknowingly get too close to a protected person? We know the US Secret Service evacuated Vice President Mike Pence(R) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi(D-CA) from their respective chambers.  I realize there could have been something I haven’t seen, and the footage below is a very short video clip, but this doesn’t look to have been necessary. It’s also not apparently an accidental discharge. The shooter seems to size up the target, aim, and fire.  Her life was poached with clear intent, and I’m going to need to see the justification for this. Once again, yes, we all know she shouldn’t have been there. Does her mere presence justify her killing? If it does, then when Code Pink commandeered a hearing room to protest Rex Tillerson’s nomination, should they have been gunned-down? And what of the Republican Congressmen who stormed a secure chamber? Theoretically, they shouldn’t have been there either. Were they supposed to be gunned-down for their actions? I’m asking those Congressmen: Was this justified? Since it seems evident that they’re trying to bury all of this, I’d suggest that Trump appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the whole incident and punish all those who are guilty, either of violence on the part of protesters, or any other bad actors in this affair. We need to know the chronologically organized details of who did what, and when. If she got too close to a protectee of the Secret Service, she may have unknowingly forfeited her own life by attempting to climb through. Even if that’s so, we still need the details. There needs to be an investigation and explanation to the public for the death of 35 year-old Ashil Babbit. Transparency is a must. Otherwise, this is like Tiananmen Square.

I’m also tired of the contention that this was the worst penetration of a federal facility since the British burned the White House. That’s a lie, and it’s a well-known lie. One needs only to remember 9/11/2001 and the Pentagon to put the lie to that particular narrative. I’m not excusing the behavior of those who forced their way into the Capitol, damaged property, and behaved lawlessly, because all of that should be prosecuted and punished, but I’m not sure that anything I’ve seen here in this video suggests Babbit required summary execution. Again, it’s a short clip, and more context is needed. I don’t wish to condemn this officer without all the facts, or without knowing what exactly his frame of mind and his contextual understanding had been at the time. The left jumps to those kinds of conclusions, whereas we should demand evidence. I’m not excusing him, either. That’s why I think a full, public investigation is necessary. We need serious transparency.

OMG! Incitement of Unrest!

Friday, January 8th, 2021

Flashback: Ayanna Pressley Calling for Unrest in August

For those who may have missed it, in August, leftist nutjob, “Squad” member Ayanna Pressley(D-MA) called for unrest in the streets. Here’s the video:

I don’t want to hear another word from these people. Donald Trump NEVER said anything even approaching this. Not even close. This idiot went on MSDNC and called for unrest. This is a US Representative!

The Present Death of the Republican Party

Thursday, January 7th, 2021

The Dagger of Brutus Comes Out

They couldn’t wait to withdraw their objections.  In the Senate, they fell over one another to find microphones to declare their separation from President Trump and his supporters.  They claimed to be doing so in the name of the Republican Party, but the truth, yet to be fully revealed, is likely to be something quite different.  One by one, they came forward to stick knives in the President’s back, and it started with Vice President Pence.  From there, the opportunity presented by the chaos in the Capitol became their excuse.  It provided a convenient escape-chute for the bulk of Republican senators, and a number of lackluster Republicans in the House.  Most disgustingly, Kelly Loeffler(R-GA) who lost re-election only the morning before, and who had pledged her objection to Georgia voters only the weekend before, stood in the well of the Senate to say that she could not pursue her objection despite all that had been done in her own state to corrupt this election, including her own.  The idea that the brief outbreak of violence by unidentified instigators at the Capitol justifies the withdrawal of the objection is preposterous: One had nothing to do with the other, and to create such linkage reveals more about the dubious motives of the Senators and Representatives who did so. The truth lies not so much in the fact that they betrayed Donald Trump, but that they betrayed us. This act of cowardice among Republicans is evidence that rather than fight, the majority of Republicans decided to commit political murder-suicide, and with extreme prejudice, dealing a death-blow to the Republican Party in early morning hours of January 7th, 2021.

Here’s Loeffler knifing Georgians, Donald Trump, and indeed, all Americans in the back:

Naturally, Lindsey Graham(R-SC) couldn’t wait for his moment to swoop in from circling the carcass:

Most of us have known that the Senate, particularly, is full of RINOs.  The House too, is polluted with them. They never wanted Trump to be president, and they were only too happy to toss him overboard at the first rolling wave. Over the past four years, or even five, the Republican Party has done its best to placate its grass roots with tepid, halting support of Donald Trump. Only a relative few in the party have ever embraced the president chosen by the “deplorables,” a characterization of Trump supporters first offered by Hillary Clinton, but also expressed in the equivalent words and attitudes of such Republican turncoats as John McCain(deceased) and Mitt Romney(R-UT.)  Overnight, Kelly Loeffler spoke of her good conscience. This from a woman who promised the electorate of Georgia literally hours before that she would object, and who, with a classified briefing last year about the exploding pandemic, engaged in clear insider trading on that information to the tune of millions of dollars. What conscience has she demonstrated? This is the sort of Republican Mitch McConnell and his ilk have given us, and she’s exactly the sort of Republican who has killed the party.

I don’t know whether the remedy can any longer be to attempt to take over the GOP. I say this because the Tea Party attempted that, and while there had been some early success, particularly in 2010, the truth is that they came under harsh attack from the Republicans in the Senate, who conspired with Obama to undermine them, abuse them, and otherwise subvert their cause.  I think the Republican Party is so thoroughly filled with these DC insiders that we cannot rely upon them in any measure any longer.  I think the better alternative may finally be to form a new party, make its platform known, and carefully select and vet its candidates. This will not be easy, but none of the option we face are easy, but for surrender and subjugation. Demoralized though I may be, I have no interest in simply throwing-up my hands in submission to this monstrosity. To the degree these RINOs have committed electoral suicide, I assert that we must walk away from them with fervent resolve. There is no future in a Republican Party that treats its voters in this fashion, or abandons its toughest political fighters when the going gets tough. I am no longer willing to spend even one thin dime to support these people, and I think it’s important that we make a stand by abandoning them.

Vice President Mike “Pontius” Pence was the most cowardly and despicable of all.  He actually contended that he was being asked to set aside electoral votes, but that is not what he had been asked to do.  Instead, he was asked to send the matter back to the six or seven state legislatures in question, and indeed, a number of those legislatures had asked that he do so.  This is not so extreme a proposition as he pretended, but more, I believe he never had Donald Trump’s back.  From my perspective, I think in the eyes of many, he may have been the real “insurance policy” Strzok and Page discussed in their chain of treasonous texts. It’s been clear for a long while that Pence was never really fully aboard the Trump train, and his connections in Washington DC are all of the BushCo/RINO strain.

Now, at this late hour, Chuck Schumer(D-NY) is calling for the use of the 25th amendment to remove President Trump, and impeachment if that effort fails.

These people are despicable. They no longer wish to simply see him out of office, but to destroy him forever more.

We must get beyond these people, and I no longer believe the Republican Party can serve as the conduit for our dissatisfaction. In point of fact, they’ve too often obstructed the will of the people. I don’t know how to build a new political party and movement, but I’m willing to begin. I’d enjoy reading comments from readers who might offer suggestions. In some form or fashion, this must be an America First party, and it’s clear that the Republican party cannot serve as its home.

 

Levin Condemns Violence; Prompts Critical Question

Wednesday, January 6th, 2021

Is there no answer?

This evening, my favorite talk-show host took to the airwaves and condemned the violence that occurred today on Capitol Hill. As I’ve pointed out earlier, this looks like a set-up job by the DC UniParty, and while Levin(and others including particularly the President,) is right to  condemn the violence, and while I make no excuse for those who launched this assault, such actions being repugnant in a constitutional, representative republic, I nevertheless have serious misgivings about the focus on this incident for several reasons. Levin rightly points out that we have no room to condemn Antifa and BLM if this sort of thing goes on with alleged conservative actors.  I agree.  On its face, this was egregious behavior, and it appears that at least one young woman paid with her life.  The other point Levin made is that those who carried this out must be identified and prosecuted. Again, I agree. There is substantial evidence that the people who instigated violence at the Capitol today were in fact camouflaged members of Antifa and other various anarchists. I am not here suggesting that absolutely no Trump supporters took part, but I have serious doubts about the contention that is widely the case. More than all this, however, the problem comes in when Mark Levin argues that we must never violate the law. Never?  Not even unjust law?  Would violations of the law be impermissible even in a growing tyranny? You see, I believe we’re in a sucker’s trap.  I think this is the problem for which Levin and others, myself included, have offered no solution.  We are in a constitutional crisis, but I think even Levin, for all his wisdom can’t quite see it: Once the power of the state is perverted to the extent that official actors now participate in the fraud against the people, how then do the people ever correct it without resort to violence?

I do not say this lightly. We now find ourselves in the situation in which a large proportion of the country now believes the election was rigged and stolen, and not merely by private actors, which would be abominable enough, but with the assistance and collusion of actors in the offices of local, state, and federal governments.  Once you cross that particular line, it seems to me there is no going back, and no way in which to resolve it peaceably. Again, I do not make this argument lightly, and I also do not contend that my evaluation is perfect, or infallible, but again, I must insist that those who argue we must never resort to violence must now step forward to explain how it is we’re to logically, rationally, and legally overcome all that’s been arrayed against us.

Let us suppose for a moment that those of us who believe this election was wholly fraudulent are correct. What then?  How do we undo it?  As Levin himself pointed out in rightful criticism of Senator Rand Paul’s(R-KY) suggestion that this is a states’ issue, essentially, Paul laid down the notion that this isn’t something to be addressed at the federal level, and that the remedy lies within the individual states. As Levin contends rightly, what good is state law if it’s going to be ignored by states’ office-holders? You see, it’s a farce to suggest that if the legislature of Georgia wants to fix the election issues, all it needs to do is pass some laws, if immediately thereafter, their Secretary of State enters into a consent agreement with agitators for the opposition that effectively nullify the very laws they’ve enacted.  What good then is law?

Levin would rightly argue that we should be able to rely upon the courts as a backstop to enforce and uphold the law. Will they? All evidence from this election cycle suggests that the courts either have no stomach or are ideologically inclined to justify these transgressions of law.  You see, this becomes the inescapable and gaping hole in Levin’s argument. Of course, it’s not only Levin who makes this argument. I would, in ordinary times, make the same basic argument, but look at the scale of what’s been done, and what actually confronts us.  This is not an insignificant one-off in a single small jurisdiction that can be remedied by a single population of an isolated locale.  This issue is much broader, involving all three branches of government, and at all levels of governance. All of it is further buttressed by media institutions only too happy for the current course of things, since they are almost entirely corrupt too.

Like so many of my readers, I’ve raised my hand and recited the words of an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States. To suggest, however, that we’re not in a constitutional crisis merely because we still maintain the façade of law and constitutional order is preposterous. It is quite clear that what we are seeing at present is a complete devolution of the constitutional order, or what Levin terms a “post-constitutional” disorder. While in the classical definition of the term, we’re not in a constitutional crisis, we nevertheless find ourselves in some sort of crisis, whatever adjective you might prefer to define it. This is an untenable circumstance, whatever particular label we may choose to affix to it. The simple fact is that we men and women who comprise the bulk of the population that holds up this country, whose children before themselves fight this nation’s wars, spilling their blood all across the globe, find ourselves in the position that we cannot rely upon law.

My questions for those wiser than I, can be only that which others around me find themselves asking of our thought leaders:

What now? What are we to do? What am I to do? I’ve voted. Over and over. I’ve elected people, and they betray us, or find themselves betrayed. We appoint what we think are good judges, yet they fail and abandon our constitution when the going gets tough. We follow all of the rules. We play fair. We volunteer and participate in public affairs in various ways. We man the polling places, but find ourselves ejected so we cannot even view the process. We do everything we can reasonably do. We short our own lives by contributing grocery money to these politicians. What more are we expected to do before we turn aside from the law? How can I overcome an enemy who will not obey the law? How can I get recourse when all the modes are ineffective or subversive?

I am not suggesting that I want an easy answer, but I must insist on a plausible answer.  Mark Levin famously wrote a tremendous book called “The Liberty Amendments.” I have one copy I read, and another autographed copy put away as a valued keepsake.  What good is it?  I’m being quite serious. What good is such an amazing idea? Yes, there’s a very slow movement of people toiling to get a convention of states together, and they’re making very slow progress, but it’s slowly waning because such a project takes decades, and most people can’t engage and maintain attention for the length of a two-page article. By the time a project of that sort bears fruit, America, as we have known it, will be gone. That is not intended to disparage the effort, but it offers no relief for the crisis in which we now find ourselves. Let me list the broad categories of problems, on the assumption that you’ve lost count:

  • The media is completely corrupt and is indeed an enemy of the people
  • Big Tech is dominated by leftists who are in league with or indeed comprise a portion of the subversives
  • The administrative state or bureaucracy now effectively makes, enforces, and judges law, combining all the powers of government into an unelected branch
  • The Congress is bought and compromised by people who do not share our interests
  • The Congress is run by unelected staff and consultants who feather their own nests
  • The Congress is completely out of control and we have no means by which to directly remove them when they transgress the constitution
  • The executive branch is out of control because it relies too heavily on executive orders, in part due to the intransigence of Congress and the courts
  • The courts are useless, concocting law when convenient, or ignoring law when its not

That’s just the start, of course, but you get the point. Then, in the last twenty minutes of his show, Levin received a call from a gentleman who raised essentially the same question, analogizing the situation to a football game in which the game is rigged, the opponent cheats, the referees collude with the opponent, and the commissioner offers no relief.  To his credit, Levin said in response that there are no easy answers.

But he will not advocate violence. He will not call for a civil war. He will not call for lawlessness.

Fine. How then, captured by at least the laundry list of deficiencies only briefly outlined above, are we ever to overcome it?

No answer.

You see, this is the point at which I have begun to part ways from Mr. Levin. I am not a violent man. I abhor violence, and I truly revile senseless destruction of any sort. I came of age in a world where two global powers constantly contemplated wiping one another from the face of the globe, with me as the forward-stationed cannon-fodder. I saw men injured, maimed, and killed, just in training for that war that never came, at least not in that form, so I know too well the costs of violence.

That said, Levin mentioned that all of this is coming to a head. Indeed. What then? You see, I believe in self-defense, and I also believe in the defense of my nation. At what point do we, as individuals, make the decision that we’ve done all that we can peaceably do, but that action is now required that must risk more than peaceful protest and public political activism? Levin closed the show by stating bluntly that he will never advocate violence.

Never? Under no circumstance? Inconceivable?

You see, this is where I do part company from Levin. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin and all those other men of that period also parted company from Levin.  I think part of the problem, and it’s much broader than just Levin, is that if you’ve had your business closed by a lockdown in one of these deep blue hellholes, or had your vote stolen/nullified in one of these compromised states, you may have a different view. If you’ve watched your country systematically demolished, but haven’t the means to make an escape to safer shores, you may view this differently. If your children have been propagandized right under your nose in the college or primary schools for which you’ve paid through the nose, only to see them turned against you, I suspect you may feel differently.

Mark Levin doesn’t know me. I have some reason to think he may be slightly aware of me. Over the years, when I’ve been able, I’ve contributed to many of the causes and candidates he has recommended, but that doesn’t mean he owes me anything. What I do think he owes his audience, me included, if it’s anything at all, is some sort of explanation of what we are to do. Most of my readers are regular listeners to his show. I’d wager that at least half my readers have subscriptions to BlazeTV and have had subscriptions all the way back to the start when it was LevinTV. There isn’t a book he’s written of which I don’t have at least two copies, all in hardback(usually one dog-eared and marked-up as a study tool, and one in pristine condition, often autographed and kept as a collectible) save for “Men in Black” and “Rescuing Sprite” which were available new in paperback only by the time I became aware of them. I receive mailings from Landmark Legal Foundation to which I am a contributor when I find a few spare dollars to send. My point is that like so many of my readers, I’ve availed myself of Mark’s work and supported it frequently. I don’t religiously purchase from his advertisers, but if I am purchasing an item in the same category as one advertised on his show, I always choose it and make sure the seller knows where I heard about their offerings. Like most conservatives, I am loyal to those who serve our nation while entertaining, educating and edifying me and those around me.

I don’t know if Mr. Levin will ever see this piece, but if he does, I suspect it will pain him a bit, as it does me to write it. I love his show, and I love his sense of humor, and I enjoy his taste in bumper-music. He adds value to my life, every day, but I’m afraid that on this day, I need a little more. Given all that confronts us, to say that I’ve been demoralized is to understate the scope and the intensity of the issue. It’s not that the fight has gone out of me, because I love my country, and I’ve done more on behalf of my country and countrymen than most by a fair piece, and maybe that’s why the demoralization now feels so intense: You can’t know how much you love a thing until you’ve risked your neck for it, toiled for it, shed blood, sweat and tears for it, and sworn your allegiance to it, all to see it collapsing around you. I know Mark doesn’t have all the answers, but the answer cannot be just to lie here, supine, and take whatever it is that they dish out.

Now the leftists will, it seems, control all of the federal government. Top to bottom. Side to side. They are already planning all the mischief they intend. They have legislative packages ready to go, to send to the desk of…President Biden, the imposter, who will happily sign what they send him into law. Levin says he will never advocate violence.  It sounds great, until you realize what it means in full. They will come for our second amendment and all the implements of its exercise. They will not amend the constitution. They will simply shove it down our throats with a packed court and a stolen Presidency and Senate. I will not be made defenseless. If the disposition of the Polish Jews in Warsaw taught no other lesson to posterity, it must be that one. I also will not be reduced to a rat, left to shelter in my nest, clutching my implements, while waiting to be “evacuated.” In New York, the legislators now introduce a bill to detain and take into custody any people who might carry or pass any disease.

What answer is there to such things — to prevent the execution of such things? If the law is no further impediment to tyranny and abuse, what remains? I don’t revel in the asking of this question. I detest the fact that I find myself in this position. But wishes are not reality. There is a reason that civilized nations consider violence as the last resort. The question is rapidly advancing to the forefront: Have we arrived at a time of last resort?

What, concretely, am I to do?

 

Editor’s note: I’ve had a question from a reader asking “what is the classical definition of constitutional crisis,” mentioned above. Generally, a constitutional crisis is any of a number of possible situations in which the constitution provides no answer to some sort of underlying contradiction. It’s essentially a sort of structural problem, and it can have many types of causes. In this way, one might consider our current circumstance to be a constitutional crisis, because the constitution certainly offers no clear remedy when it’s apparent that some or all branches may have essentially discarded its provisions, restrictions, or prohibitions. Still, I think the term intends to countenance those sorts of issues that can arise out of parties exercising their powers, privileges, rights and so on and what happens when those come into clear conflict. I understand why legal and political theorists might not consider our current situation to fit within the loose definition of a “constitutional crisis,” as they might define it, but we’re certainly in a crisis, inasmuch as it’s difficult to find anybody in Washington DC willing to live within its bounds. Maybe a better term here would be “constitutional catastrophe,” because whatever you call it, this situation is likely to result in the dissolution of the republic. Most consider the attempted secession of the Southern states in 1861 to have been a constitutional crisis, because, among other reasons, the constitution is silent on how or if states may leave the union, having previously entered it. I have always thought that among the flurry of amendments after the Civil War, Congress ought to have passed one describing a legal procedure for secession. (I don’t think parties should be forced to remain married once their differences have become irreconcilable, or partners compelled to remain in a business partnership once they’ve become irreconcilably averse to said relationship, but that’s another story for another day.)

Bannon Interview With Archbishop Viganò

Monday, January 4th, 2021

Archboshop Vigano Explains the Battle Ahead

In the past, I’ve brought you other public writings of Archbishop Viganò. Here, he interviewed by Steve Bannon, and it should be mentioned that this has been posted on Raheem Kassam’s National Pulse website. The text of the written interview is below:

Bannon-Vigano-Interview-01042021

Cruz Objection Looks Like Political Dodge (Updated)

Sunday, January 3rd, 2021

Real Objection?

Those of you watching the developments over the weekend may be aware that Senator Ted Cruz(R-TX) has introduced an effort to raise an objection on January 6th, with the stated objective of creating an emergency audit and commission to examine the election results. Lindsey Graham(R-SC) tweeted about this, and while I never trust Lindsey Graham, because he’s frankly a political dogpile, the truth is that in this assessment, I think he may be correct. He called the Cruz effort a political dodge:

 

While I have no doubt that Graham would just as soon torch President Trump as help him, I think there is also truth in what he says here. If you go on to read the remainder of the tweets in Graham’s thread, he lays out his case in subsequent tweets.  Like Graham, I don’t see much of a chance that Cruz’s effort will succeed, because it would appear to require a majority in both houses of Congress to accomplish. That’s extraordinarily unlikely to succeed, and despite the fact that Cruz has the support of at least ten other senators, that’s a long way from a majority. What’s the point of the effort, if it ostensibly cannot succeed? The answer is pure politics. The people signing on to this effort all wish to avoid the wrath of voters in their states, and all of them wish to likewise avoid the vengeance of Mitch McConnell. They all want to continue to receive cash from the big fund-raisers, but they don’t want to anger the people back home. How do they straddle that particular fence? Naturally, in any such situation, a politician will launch an effort of some sort that is meant to placate voters while accomplishing nothing. Big-money contributors likely know what’s afoot, and indeed, some of the senators may tell them so explicitly, though never in public view. Cruz, who undoubtedly imagines himself as his party’s nominee in 2024, also seeks the notoriety among conservatives for having been seen to “lead” an effort to do something.

One might consider this assessment to be quite cynical, but I think when it comes to politicians, we’re not nearly cynical enough. I also know that Graham hasn’t given up his fantasy of seeking the GOP nomination, but I’ve got news for Graham, and for Cruz, and for the bulk of the others who pursued the GOP nomination in 2016: It isn’t happening. There isn’t a single one among the crowd who I would support for the nomination. Not even one. There is still a large number of CruzCrew people out there who imagine putting the band back together in 2024, although I think that’s a fantasy – one in which Senator Cruz is all too willing to engage. I say this because while Cruz appears to be conservative on many issues, he’s also shown a healthy ability to do in Washington DC that which would not be popular at home in Texas when he thinks Texans aren’t looking. I also think he’s given only half-hearted support to Donald Trump, and while I think after the primary campaign of 2016, that’s at least somewhat understandable, I also know that when he failed to give full, activist support to the president, he was doing so mostly in ways that harmed his own constituents. Most won’t have noticed, but a few of us did.

Among all those being talked about for 2024, the only ones I see as plausible(so far) are Senator Tom Cotton(R-AR,) Governor Ron DeSantis(R-FL,) SecState Mike Pompeo(R-KS,) and Governor Kristi Noem(R-SD.) Vice President Pence is widely seen as a nice guy(are we sure?) but also widely panned as too stiff and too wooden. At present, I see no prospects that any of the competitors of 2016 have even a small chance of winning the nomination, because they’ll all be viewed as retreads at best, who were all soundly demolished by Donald Trump. Cruz, amongst the 2016 also-rans, has the most credible chance to make a comeback, but I think a few of his actions over the past few years and his stunning near-loss to Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke in Texas should give you a sense of just how damaged he really is, even in his own state. Senator Cruz has shown a distinct propensity to put on a political show on Capitol hill, but he’s not produced many tangible results, even when Republican still held the House. Why wasn’t he leading significant legislative efforts in support of Donald Trump’s agenda then, when they could have been enacted? He also likes to put on a show in committee hearings, which are mostly opportunities for member grandstanding, and the question of big-tech CEOs, while entertaining, wasn’t followed-up with any significant legislative efforts. It’s easier to fund-raise off of conservative discontent over social media censorship than to actually do anything about it.

This is the problem all Americans face in electoral politics: Most of the people who run or hold office are just playing political games to further their ambitions, to feather their own nests, or both. While this effort by Cruz will get a lot of attention, I also think it was offered as a way to get people to overlook the intended objection by Senator Josh Hawley(R-MO) that focuses specifically on the grounds that the election in at least one of the states was carried out in contravention of that state’s own laws. I also think it was offered as a path to seek cover for Republicans who face angry conservatives at home if they do nothing at all, while permitting senators to avoid signing-on to Hawley’s objection.  Readers will have no idea how thoroughly I hate writing it, but in this case, Lindsey Graham is probably correct in his characterization of the Cruz motive, but indeed, I think we’re being played.

Rather than pursue that line of objection, I think conservatives should insist that their senators sign-on to Hawley’s effort. I think it’s more direct, and doesn’t rely on some commission to absolve legislators of their own duty to use their own judgment in ascertaining the legitimacy of the election. This is another widespread scam: When politicians or other government officials call for a “blue ribbon panel(or commission)” to examine this thing or that, it’s for the explicit purpose of sloughing-off responsibility on others, to get the invariably hot potato out of their hands. It’s almost as bad as the tendency of government bodies to rely on consultants, to whom they pay exorbitant fees, upon which those bodies inevitably shift blame if things go wrong. I think it ought to be a crime for government(s) to hire consultants or appoint commissions. It’s far too easy for the elected set to avoid culpability and the responsibility of definitive judgments.

 

Editors Note: There is no doubt in my mind that this election is being stolen, and that President Donald J. Trump was re-elected in a landslide if only legitimate ballots from properly registered and legally voting citizens are counted. That said, my issue here is with this particular objection and its form as well as the motive driving it. I find it less than forthright, and objectionable on its own. I think members of both houses of Congress should raise serious objections to the legitimacy of this entire #ElectionCoup, and I also think that there is little stomach in the Republican caucus is either house  of Congress to actually do so. We all know Republicans like to be good losers, but they also like to put on a good show for we deplorables and hobbits and flyover people who elect them. Trump is nearly the only elected Republican who actually fights, and it’s disgusting that every last one of them hasn’t rallied to his side.

Update: As if to buttress my point, the following quote from Cruz:

Look, we’ve got to vote on January 6 on certification and every member of Congress faces a dilemma. Frankly, two pretty lousy choices: one, we can vote to certify by not considering any objection. If we do that that will be heard by a lot of Americans as saying, ‘We don’t think voter fraud is a real concern. We don’t think these claims should be investigated thoroughly,

I know that’s not what most of us believe. But, secondly, and I think all of us, rightly, don’t want to be in a position where we’re suggesting setting aside the results of an election just because the candidate that we supported didn’t happen to prevail. That’s not a principled constitutional position,” he continued. “That’s why, in assembling this group of 11 senators, I was looking for a third option, an option that was really moored in the law.(Emphasis added.)

Well, there you have it: Senator Cruz was looking for a political option that permits him to object without the necessity of actually doing what’s needed.

 

 

Gang Rapists on the Supreme Court

Friday, December 11th, 2020

Best Little Whorehouse in DC

In 2018, we watched as the Democrat accused Brett Kavanaugh of rape after being nominated to the Supreme Court by President Trump. In 2020, the characterization of Kavanaugh was finally substantiated, only there’s a problem: There are at least seven gang-rapists on the Supreme Court of the United States, or as Mr. L rightly termed them, the Supine Cowards of the United States. The shocking part is that almost half of the rapists on the court are women, and at least three of them are alleged constitutionalists.  In a 7-2 majority, Alito and Thomas dissenting, the seven supine, cowardly gang-rapists took the constitution out, dusted it off, lashed it to the bench, and took turns at it, repeatedly raping her until she was dead. They didn’t even get it drunk first. The two dissenters stood aside, remarking only that while they disagreed on the standing issue, they wouldn’t have ordered a remedy anyway.

These people disgust me. They make Swalwell’s Fang Fang Bang-Bang look normal.

Whatever else one might say about the left, they fight like Hell. They lie, they cheat, they steal, the extort, blackmail and corrupt everything they touch. If that doesn’t work, they’ll turn to naked threats and coercion.

As Mark Levin shared on his show, Professor Glenn Reynolds pointed out the oddity of finding Texas had no standing, when in Massachusetts v. EPA, the court did find standing for a state suing to impose enforcement in other states. In that case, Massachusetts was found to have standing because carbon dioxide produced in neighboring states would have an effect in their state, thus the EPA could compel various regulatory provisions in neighboring states.

The whole damned thing is a rigged bit of nonsense anyway. The whole point is that they don’t want evidence ever presented, therefore none of these cases have been addressed on their merits. It’s all procedural malarkey. Washington DC is getting rid of Donald Trump, whatever the law is, and irrespective of whatever cheating it took to do so. It’s all about that, and nothing else. The gang-rapists staffing the Supine Cowards of the United States are seeing to it, playing their assigned role.

There is little hope now, but what form rebellion will take. They are going to drag us, kicking and screaming, into their “New World Order” or “Fourth Industrial Revolution” or “Great Reset” or whatever they’ve decided to call it this week. Your screams for help will be just a tease to the gang-rapists on the court. Traitors all.

Is that it? Are we done?

Monday, December 7th, 2020

What are you prepared to do?

My use of a Hollywood film is intended to set the tone for this post. I want you to think about what’s gone on here. I want you to consider what’s really at stake, and what we need to do about it. This election has been stolen.  If permitted to get away with it, we will NEVER have another fair election in this country. The Democrats and their RINO collaborators(and there are many,) are prepared to do whatever may be necessary to carry out this #ElectionCoup. I bring to your attention a couple of movie clips, by way of helping you understand not only what we’re really up against, but also what our own failure to immediately engage will mean. This isn’t about excuse-making. This isn’t about all the reasons to remain uninvolved.  This is about whether we will be ruled by frauds, cheats, and traitors – criminals – who care not about our feelings on the matter, or whether we view it as fair.  They are interested in naked power, and to obtain/maintain that power, they will lie, cheat, steal, defraud, defame, and even kill in order to get it.  This is a criminal element every bit as bad as any mafia ever portrayed in Hollywood, but it’s important that you understand. Some of us do. Donald Trump understands. He warned us.  He told us. This fight isn’t merely the DC establishment against him, but instead, them against all of us. This is our country, and they’re stealing it along with the election. They’re stealing it, not from Donald J. Trump, but from you, your children, and all posterity. It’s their contention that they are the untouchables, beyond politics, beyond majorities, and out of reach of the law.

If you understand the part played by Sean Connery in the film “The Untouchables,” you’ll understand the deal that his character Mike Malone was offering Elliot Ness(Kevin Costner.) Taking his deal meant that Ness would need to be willing to go all the way, and perhaps even beyond his legal mandate.  If you’ve seen the movie, you know that in the end, Ness is willing, but it takes the loss of Malone to make plain to him that sometimes, the rules have to suspended by rational men in order to preserve the long-term value of the rule of law. As a country, having witnessed this sort of ribald theft of an election that will bear upon the people of the United States for generations, I think we must consider seriously if we have arrived at such a time.  Here, Ness gives chase to Malone’s killer, finally realizing that the killer must never be permitted to get away with his crime, even if that means straight-laced Ness must, himself, cross over the line:

Ladies and gentlemen, for more reasons that most readers will have reason to know, I love the law. I swore an oath in my youth to uphold the constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I’ve always believed that such an oath can have no expiration.  The constitution has now become the tool of enemies, both foreign and domestic, and it is being wielded against we, the American people. I despise lawlessness, riots, and wars. I despise criminal conspiracies of would-be tyrants even more, because they make all of those things a permanent condition.  In the year 2020, we have seen the law turned against law-abiding people, and we’ve seen it ignore vile rioters, looters, murderers and thugs. We’ve watched as our law has been used as the means to subvert our electoral process, while the courts, often with conspirators or actors in collusion, have set about to cement this criminality in place, hoping we’ll just accept it without protest, or the first sign of rage.  They’ve even managed to silence us in such a way that any sign of our rage is blotted from the Internet, made invisible to our television screens, and mute on our radios.  This is literal Hell, but if that is the true nature of war, then let us recognize it is upon us.  Donald Trump is just our totem.  He’s been our proxy as the media has lashed him for more than four years on our behalf.  We’ve mostly sat by while this man has taken all the slings and arrows.

There comes the inevitable moment in the film when Malone asks Ness: “Is that it? Are we done?” If this has been the extent of our opposition, we are much weaker and more pathetic than my worst fears. When Democrats wish to make a point, they do things like occupy a statehouse. Where are we on that? Where are Georgians? Pennsylvanians? Michiganders? Arizonans? Wisconsinites? Nevadans? I hear some rumblings, but not nearly enough. It seems as though Governors Ducey and Kemp have no problem thwarting even peaceable protest from their own side of the aisle.

Folks, it’s as simple as this: If you won’t fight for your country, you’re going to lose it. There is nothing else. People ask me if I want a civil war. The answer to that should be obvious to all my long-time readers: Absolutely not.

But that’s not and should never have been the question. The real question is: At what cost will we cling to peace? The other question is: Do you think that such a peace is anything but a costly but inevitably temporary suspension of hostilities? Do you believe that having gotten away with it in this instance, the people responsible will refrain from doing so again? And again? And what will they do in the mean time?

Do I want a civil war? Hell no! Will I fight one if necessary?

Yes.

There comes a time when the law no longer serves as deterrent to criminals, and the only way to restore justice and observance of the law is to set the law temporarily aside. Lincoln did so. Our founders did so. They recognized that in some circumstances, the law no longer provides remedies to corruption and criminality; treason and tyranny. This election has been in part a Cyber-Warfare Coup, and in part an exercise in old-fashioned ballot-stuffing. The media, in collusion or overt conspiracy with the coup-plotters, is hiding the crime the easiest way they can: They deny it exists and refuse it coverage.  This is where we stand, and my question for all of you, young and old; rich and poor; man and woman; one and all: What are you prepared to do?

 

 

Boom: Sidney Powell Releasing the Kraken

Sunday, November 15th, 2020

One of the President’s attorney, Sidney Powell, who also represent Lt. General Michael Flynn, was on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo (H/T TheGatewayPundit):

#ElectionCoup Updates

Sunday, November 8th, 2020

This is a Coup d’etat disguised as an election

Because of the way in which Fascistbook and the TwitNazis are censoring content on their platforms, I am going to post links and videos here so that you can read them without the post itself being throttled or censored on their platforms. Think of this post as a workaround for their attempts to suppress truth.

From Thursday, November 12th:

Pamela Geller: Dominion Voting Systems Whistleblowers Come Forward

 

From Wednesday, November 11th:

Report argues there is incontrovertible evidence of massive hack of election.

 

From Monday, November 9th:

Again, TheGatewayPundit scores another huge story: As many as 132,000 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia are ineligible.

The Moment Vote Counts flipped in Virginia.

 

From Sunday, November 8th:

First, watch this video:

The article she mentions is linked here.

This just in from Sidney Powell, one of President Trump’s attorneys:

We’ve Identified 450,000 Ballots that Miraculously ONLY have a Vote for Joe Biden – Sidney Powell

Here’s an analysis from a statistician. He shows the serious anomalies in Pennsylvania.

Now there’s this story of very unusual happenings in Milwaukee.

Wisconsin elections clerks may have illegally altered thousands of absentee ballots.

TheGatewayPundit published this fascinating(and damning) statistical analysis of the distribution of votes.

Joe Hoft over at TheGatewayPundit  is doing excellent work with a prioritized list of election issues that need to be pursued and how you can help.

Unbelievable: GateWayPundit reports some nitwit who claims to work for Wayne County, Michigan claims to have trashed tens of thousands of Trump Ballots

I will continue to add information to this page. If you spot something useful, please add it in comments. Thanks to all.

MAGA!

Oh, and for entertainment purposes, with STRONG LANGUAGE WARNING:

The Art of the Steal

Saturday, November 7th, 2020

#ElectionCoup: Integrity Under Attack

In years past, conservatives and other Republican-leaning voters have learned to accept that a certain amount of election fraud is inevitable. We’ve taken for granted that in slimy Democrat-run districts, wards, and precincts; cities, counties and states, that some amount of election tampering and corruption is to be expected, and that Republican candidates for office must program that corruption into their calculus about what it will take to win. In Pennsylvania, for instance, there’s long been what some Republicans call the Philly-tax, where a GOP candidate must win by an overwhelming margin to make up for the amount of fraud that will be used to thwart them.  Mostly, Republicans grimly nod in agreement that this is and will always be a fact of life, as though there’s nothing to be done about it, and that the people who run these corrupt election-fraud operations are to be treated like local warlords, to whom tribute must be paid. In 2016, when Donald J. Trump shocked the world and won the presidency, these Democrat warlords decided that this would never be permitted again. Together with the party hierarchy, they have conspired through measures both covert and overt to corrupt the 2020 election. Donald J. Trump long ago wrote a book entitled The Art of the Deal, but in 2020, the Biden/Harris campaign has re-written an old thesis, using the most modern and simultaneously primitive means to concoct a new plan to corrupt this year’s election in what I now term The Art of the Steal.

The steal relies on both modern and primitive means. It uses propaganda and media collusion at the highest levels, even of outlets previously “trusted” by many mainstream Republicans. It relies on electronic ballot tabulation misfeasance, and it relies on plain old ballot manufacturing and suppression of validation of ballots. It is widespread, and Democrats have long employed all of these means and methods, but never before were so many called into service all at once, nor so clumsily and obviously. Let us examine what has been done, and whether we should so blithely, grimly shrug our shoulders in acceptance of yet another fraud carried out by such a widespread gang of electoral bandits.

For weeks, prior to the election, indeed for months, they told you, bluntly and in the open, that on election night, it would look like Trump was winning, but that as the night turned into days or weeks, the counts would shift, and Joe Biden would be elected. They could tell you this with such confidence because they were rigging the game, and they expected no opposition, no oversight, and no damned consequences to this set of actions. What they were broadcasting, in the open, was their intention to steal the election, only they didn’t call it a steal. They told you to expect it as a normal consequence of a hotly contested election. It was all propaganda, intended to get you accustomed to the idea, so that when it happened, you would not stand up, raise Hell, and put up a fuss about it. After all, you knew it was going to happen, it was inevitable they told you, and now you were seeing it happen before your very eyes. Underlying all of this is that you had been conditioned to expect it. That would make it easier for you to stomach and accept the steal.

The pollsters played their predictable roles.  They continued to use their polls to dis-spirit and demoralize Trump voters. The idea was to keep some small margin of you from the polls, since it was “hopeless” and the outcome had now been presented to you as inevitable. Ludicrous polls, showing Biden with leads of as high as 17 points in places like Wisconsin were fabricated out of bad samples, bad methodology, and purely propagandist intent. These suppression polls served a second nefarious purpose: They would help substantiate the legitimacy of Biden victories after the steal had begun. They would be used ultimately, to say effectively: “Well, we got the margins wrong, but we were right about the winner.” The problem is that for people who follow all of this, many knew or at least thoroughly suspected that these polls were as fallacious as the rest of big media’s nonsense. Still, they only had to work against that less attentive segment of the populace, who pay attention in the last week or so before an election, vote, and then go on with their lives otherwise oblivious to it all. This was the target audience, but for it to work, it only needs to get a slim margin of people to believe it, since elections can turn on a single vote. It was all aimed at the lazy or demoralized voter who too easily shrugs: “My vote doesn’t matter anyway.”

Big-Tech platforms were all in on the steal too. They were spending money like crazy in what should be considered “in-kind contributions” to the Democrats in general, and the Biden/Harris campaign in particular.  Suppression of true negative information about Biden and Harris, or Democrats generically, was widespread in social media. Facebook was throttling posts, deleting conservative political groups, banning users, placing phony warning labels on content, and conducting every conceivable form of tortious interference against conservative or even moderate content providers. They censored President Trump, people in his administration and on his campaign staff, while they permitted Joe Biden and his surrogates to make the most outrageously false claims. There’s no need to document this here, as you’ve all seen it, you’ve all been exposed to it, and you all know it to be true. This social media interference in the election was so lopsided as to be preposterous.

Of course, there were also high-tech bandits involved. We’re now only scratching the surface, but what is known at this moment is that a company called Dominion Voting Systems, co-founded by a California Democrat, has captured a broad market in the voting machines and software industry. Part of what helped them get such widespread saturation in this election were the incessant, inflated claims of “Russian interference” in the 2016 elections. Would you be surprised to learn that due to the obvious security problems with their systems and software, the State of Texas rejected them for Texas elections? Nevertheless, in 33 states and over 1,000 US counties, their software and hardware was in use for voting and tabulation. There are approximately 3,100 counties, boroughs, and parishes(all equivalent political divisions in their respective states) in the United States. This means that Dominion Voting Systems has penetration into at least one-third of the country, but more importantly, their systems are in use in some of the most populace counties, cities, and jurisdictions around the country, so that effective vote control may be closer to one-half or more of the total vote. Estimates vary, but suffice it to say that the reach of their influence is enormous on US elections.

This is important, because we learned yesterday that in one county in Michigan, the software allegedly “glitched” and moved 6,000 votes from the Trump column into the Biden column, and it swung a US House seat. A Democrat who had been winning by 5,000 votes was placed into a 1,000 vote deficit after the “glitch” was corrected. Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve been working with systems and data for a long, long time. This is a “glitch?” I and others now strongly suspect that this was a feature – not a bug. Watch Sidney Powell discuss it here:

The mainstream media is even now carrying out a hoax. They’ve gone forward to claim Joe Biden is the winner. It began on Saturday morning with the Associated Press and NBC News as the first two to make the claim on Biden’s behalf. The rest, including disgraced FoxNews, have all fallen in line. It’s all propaganda. Nothing has substantially changed. No results have been certified. Federal investigators are even now arriving in Michigan to look at the allegations made in a viral video from Project Veritas on the steal going on in that state.

Another thing that’s now clear is that you should not be using FoxNews as a source. I’ve completely switched to a combination of NewsMax, OANN, and America’s Voice, all via ROKU, or youtube in some instances. For instance, NewMax has released a statement that they are not calling this election for Joe Biden because there are too many unresolved issues with the count, the fraud, and so on.

Here’s what’s actually happened:

  • The media creates an illusion of Biden inevitability
  • Social Media blocks/throttles/bans conservative or pro-Trump voices
  • On election night, after counting stops, everybody goes to bed, and suddenly the counting restarts and Biden votes begin accumulating
  • When the counting stops, Republican observers are either sent home, or forbidden to re-enter to view counting as it restarts
  • Electronic and paper vote-rigging occurs in several states, including those now in controversy
  • Media creates and fulfills previous narrative: Biden is declared winner
  • RINO Republicans/NeverTrumpers begin to label all questions of vote fraud/ballot tampering as “conspiracy theories” in effort to suppress
  • Now the Squish Republicans/NeverTrumpers will begin to insist Trump concede, joining with media narrative(already begun)
  • In social media, despite best efforts of the minders and censors, word is spreading that the whole thing is a steal

Ladies and gentlemen, you’re all grown adults, but by now, finally, after years and decades of this nonsense and treachery, you should have finally come to understand that if you put up with this now, you will never get your country back. Even now, they’re agitating with the BLM and Antifa mobs to try to force Donald Trump to concede. This is a coup. It was never an election. It’s about creating the impression of a mostly peaceful election, followed by an intransigent President who refuses to concede in order to justify whatever they intend to do next. This is a coup d’etat.

All hands on deck now. Your voices, at a minimum, will be needed to stem this tide of tyranny. You are watching the Art of the Steal, and what’s being stolen is your country. Don’t let it happen. Contact state legislators. Contact law enforcement if you personally witnessed fraud. Meanwhile, the President’s legal team is still fighting. The number of votes separating the President from Biden is very small considering the total size of the vote. The recounts are about to begin in some places. It’s not over. Whatever the media tries to pull, it’s not over, or even close to over.

 

 

 

Who Censors a Lie?

Friday, November 6th, 2020

Would you censor a lie?

Growing up and becoming an adult during the Cold War, I had the opportunity to see what propaganda and censorship by true authoritarians look like. In my years in the Army, I served in Europe, and I was able once to take a tour through Checkpoint Charlie into East Berlin on an officially sanctioned bus tour. During that tour, we learned many things, we young men of the Field Artillery who sat quietly in our dress greens as the official Soviet chaperone boarded the bus. He would be our “tour guide,” which is to say, he was our official “minder.” Naturally, like any other such tour that ever occurred, we were on official orders to be permitted onto this tour. We learned so much, but only if you paid close attention. Apart from the minder, our chaperone, the first thing we learned is how statists always hide the truth.  Standing in West Berlin, looking East into the imprisoned city, apart from the ghastly wall and watch towers dividing the city, you could only see what appeared to be tidy, ordered city.  The truth, however was much different, as we would soon learn: Only the truth is ever concealed by authoritarians. Why would you censor a lie?

As we passed into East Berlin, and the bus gathered speed, one of my fellow soldiers soon whispered and nodded toward the rear, not wanting to be noticed by the minder. A few at a time, we looked back at the Eastern faces of the buildings and structures we were passing, and what that revealed was something none had expected: War damage. The year was 1986, and for more than forty years, no battles had raged in these streets, but the evidence of the fierce war when the Soviets laid siege to and finally conquered Berlin was all over the buildings behind us. They’d never been repaired. Chunks were missing from concrete and stonework, bridges and ancient walls and monuments, but the Western face, what we could see from the West, was all repaired and painted, as though no war had ever raged there. They’d merely concealed the truth of the destitute state of East Berlin from the world. Nothing had been repaired fully, because there hadn’t been the money to fund repairs under the communist system. They repaired only what could be readily viewed from the West. The uncovered, naked truth could be seen fully from the East.

The next lesson we learned was economic.  They took us to an open market.  Here, we disembarked long enough to walk among the vendors and the shops, where we could purchase such items as they offered.  There was one store, an electronics shop, and I thought it would be neat to just see the state of audio equipment there. (In those years, I very much loved audio equipment, and had accumulated quite the ensemble of high fidelity audio gear.) I looked around, and the first thing I noticed was that the best of the equipment was laughable. When I’d been a little boy, in the early 1970s, I’d had a little record-player that folded open, allowed you to place your LP on it, and when you folded the cover down, it would play the record with the tone-arm and stylus in the lid. The lone turntable on display in this shop was roughly on par with my childhood toy, albeit in black. The speakers they sold were similarly terrible little boxes filled with the most depressing assembly of parts I’ve ever seen. These were the jewels of the productive might of communism. Remember, this market in which were permitted to browse was a showplace intended to display how great things were under communism. The other thing I quickly noticed is that several aisles of the store were essentially empty, but for empty racks and shelves that were dust-covered and clearly hadn’t held goods in a long time, if ever. It was all a show. Even the other shoppers, allegedly East German civilians, were entirely showpieces, meant to give the impression of bustling, busy commerce. Three of us noticed the same women with different shopping bags of goods in the space of 15 minutes. They were all play-acting, or they were spies, or both. Even the shopkeepers were fake. Two of us walked into what passed for a grocery store. The worst convenience store into which you’ve ever stumbled was a palace of plenty compared to that mortuary. Mostly empty, what little was there was all for show.

From there, we went on to a War museum, in which we saw old Soviet weaponry, mannequins dressed in the uniforms of the day, and the museum guide told us about the “Great Patriotic War” from the Soviet perspective. His history was as falsified as everything else we’d seen on the day, but what was interesting was how he omitted the roles of the other Allies in defeating Germany. To hear his telling, you’d never know that anybody but Germany and the Soviet Union had been combatants in the second World War. When a couple of our less bashful soldier very respectfully asked questions, he replied in very censored language about the subject.  It was clear there were topics about which he was not permitted to speak, and they all bordered on the topic of political aspects of history.

What we learned on this trip is that statists, specifically communists, but any authoritarian of any sort, never hide lies. They never censor falsehoods.  They spew propaganda, but you can know that whatever they seek to hide, or whatever they try to suppress, is always, always the truth. There would be no point in censoring a lie.  If I were to tell my followers on Twitter that the sky was pink with purple polka-dots, Jack Dorsey and his army of electronic TwitNazis would have no reason to censor it. It would result in self-censorship, because all who saw such a tweet would soon realize I was either completely mad or simply a liar, and would quickly unfollow me.  Similarly, Mark Zuckerberg and his army of FacsistBook minders would never bother to throttle the circulation of such a post.  Why bother?  Who would share it on their own profile page or timeline?  Nobody, except perhaps somebody equally insane or intent upon a prank. No, ladies and gentlemen, there is no real reason to censor a lie. There is no point to hiding an untruth. Lies quickly reveal themselves.  Only the truth need be concealed. Matters of opinion are that, and nothing more, but to conceal facts and truths because they are accompanied by relevant opinions is simply more of the same.

There is a reason @Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg are using their platforms to conceal what the President’s been saying. There’s a reason these networks now cut away from the President every time he starts talking about the election fraud that’s been going on this week and before. There is a reason that people who support the President in various media are being censored, throttled, banned, and shadow-banned. That reason is the same as it has ever been: There is no reason to conceal a lie, or cover-up a falsehood. There is no reason on Earth that justifies what they’re doing, and the sooner the American people come to understand what me and my fellow artillerymen learned that day in East Berlin, the better off they’ll be. There is no reason to censor a lie, so that if you see censorship, you should immediately demand to know what truths are being concealed, by whom, and for what purpose. Communists and other authoritarian statists always claim that which they seek to conceal is “disinformation,” or “misinformation,” or “propaganda,” meanwhile they peddle their own propaganda shamelessly and unrelentingly. This is never accidental.

They’re censoring you, your President, and indeed, anybody who supports him. They’re doing it in social media, in television, radio, and in print. The only motive is to conceal that which reveals their lies, just as sure as if they claimed to you the sky was pink with purple polka-dots. The election of 2020 is being stolen from you. Don’t doubt it. Proclaim it. Loudly. Broadcast it everywhere. If they’re permitted to conceal this simple truth, we will never see the end of it, and we will never get our country back.

 

 

FLASH: Election Fraud – MASSIVE STEAL IN PROGRESS

Thursday, November 5th, 2020

The Fraud Must Be Stopped

Folks, it’s clear. Donald Trump likely won the election, but now it’s clear that the strategy is to steal it.

This is a coup d’etat disguised as an election. Period.

I urge you to reject all of this and demand that ONLY LEGAL VOTES BE COUNTED.

We have only us, Donald Trump has only us. The whole of the DC swamp is trying to spit him out of its mouth, and us with him.

There has never been an event like this in American history.

On election night, FoxNews refused to call Florida, Ohio, and Texas until much later. They called Arizona prematurely.

It was all done purposefully. It was to maintain an impression of the electoral college count with Trump behind.

Then, when FoxNews fraudulently called Arizona, it permitted the so-called “blue wall” states to stop the count. At 4am, they dumped-in huge numbers of ballots for Biden. This has been documented. This is all about stealing the election that Donald Trump has won.

Candace Owen (@RealCandaceO) has found that the dead have risen up en masse to vote in Michigan, naturally for Biden.

Folks, I know the media is dis-spiriting you and that at some point, they’re going to wheel Biden out to claim victory, but it’s all an illusion so that you will surrender and submit. They’re trying to steal this election. That’s what this is all about. If they can whip you into submission, to get you to accept defeat, that’s what will happen. Do not submit. Do not surrender.

Fight at least until Donald Trump tells you otherwise, from his own lips. I will not accept results of an illegitimate election.