Posts Tagged ‘Consultants’

The DeSantis Scam of the Consultancy Class

Friday, May 19th, 2023

“You expect me to beat him?”

One of the things you learn about Washington DC is how fake everything really is.  If you’re a conservative, you generally discover this early, and you’re reminded of it often as you wonder why every campaign of consequence for federal office gets steered to the left, and loses all its vigor and fight.  There is a broad class of political consultants in Washington DC that don’t much care about ideology or policy, or to the degree they do, they tend leftward, but what they do care intensely about is candidacies.  They ultimately don’t care much about the success or failure of the candidates with whom they contract.  They don’t have any notion of loyalty, and in many cases, they actually revile the candidates for whom they work, or hold their candidates’ supporters in absolute contempt.  Republicans find this to be the case much more often than Democrats, but the source of it is something simple and unavoidable:  These political consultants are entirely a band of mercenaries, and they’re an industry unto themselves.  They don’t serve candidates, elections, or electorates.  Their only actual client is themselves.  An “uncontested election” is a serious problem for them.  Who will hire all the flunkies of alleged political wisdom?  Who will pay their bills?  This is the crowd currently fundraising for Ron DeSantis, and they’re abusing him nearly as much as his donors and supporters, but for the fact that he likely already knows.  And there’s the catch: If he knows, he’s a villain just like them, but if he doesn’t, he’s too big a fool to deserve voters’ support.

Ron DeSantis likely knows all of this.  He’s been in and around Washington DC for a long while, and he knows how the game is played.  It’s hard to imagine that he’s spent so much time in politics, particularly in Washington DC, without knowing all of this quite intimately.  He knows how the fund-raising works, and he knows how the consultants use it.  DeSantis is raising money, and he may well be raising it for a campaign he intends to run in 2028.  Understand, I am not suggesting that he won’t announce a campaign for President for 2024, but that unless he has some sort of corrupt inside information about the demise of President Trump, whether real or merely political, he has to know his chances here are poor.  Yes, he’ll get a post-announcement bounce, maybe a media/DC-supported mega-bounce, but it’s all hot air. Every candidate gets a bounce, never mind a thoroughly engineered candidate like DeSantis.  Well, except Mike Pence.  Even Nikki Haley got a micro-bounce.  The problem is that all else remaining equal, he cannot overcome Trump.  DeSantis isn’t a fool, so he knows all this.  Why bother?

DeSantis may be playing a shrewd fund-raising game, both on behalf of his own future prospects, but also on behalf of his friends in DC who do not wish to see President Trump re-elevated into that office.  You see, a 2024 campaign can be quite useful in banking money to be used in 2028, having spent only a token amount of his growing war chest on 2024.  More, it takes money that would in large measure be available to Trump for 2024.  This splitting-away of approximately Republican resources may be the more important part of the goal, because the GOP insiders do not want Trump, though they’ve resigned themselves to that probability.  Their “plan B” is that they will undermine him with a bloody primary to make sure his sort never rises again.

DeSantis’ campaign, if launched, isn’t going to be a fruitful one for anybody except Ron 2028, and the entirety of the vaguely Republican-ish consultancy class. They will make millions.  They’ll rake in the money, knowing from the outset that their is a losing effort from the start.  They’ll waste the money of rank-and-file DeSantis supporters and even some up-scale money guys because these are the people who have perfected the narrative that Trump isn’t a nice, traditional, bend-over-and-take-it Republican, but have packaged it in a way that these bend-over-and-take-it Republicans don’t feel as though they’ve been so thoroughly debased.

Honestly, when you think about it, these consultants, despicable though they may be, enjoy the perfect racket: They needn’t produce victory.  They needn’t give sound advice.  They need only create the impression that they “got close” with their candidates, and they seldom pay a professional price.  When I think back on the tortured stupidity of Steve Schmidt and Nicolle Wallace from 2008, insisting that McCain suspend his campaign “to deal with the financial crisis,” and then blaming the debacle they created on Sarah Palin, you need look no further.  These exemplars of the type should serve as reminders to future candidates that they have no loyalty to their candidates, no ideology they firmly hold, and no person they will not stab with a shiv in order to try to preserve their own reputations against the backdrop of their colossal failures and poor judgement.  The real clue, of course, is the money.  All of these people care only about money, so that when they talk one of these politicians into making a run, they insist that the candidate begin raising money immediately, and as much as possible.  You’d think that this is wise, inasmuch as the candidate will need the money for their eventual campaign, and that’s true, but the real cause is much worse: None of the people who comprise the political consultancy class in and around DC wish to hitch their own wagons to an underfunded candidate, because most importantly, they want a big payday.

I’m not telling you that it will be purely impossible for DeSantis to enter the race, overcome a two-to-one margin of support, and gain the Republican nomination.  I’m telling you that whether he wins the nomination(this time) or not really is not all that important to DeSantis himself, and it certainly doesn’t matter to the consultancy class now swarming him like flies to a turd. The key is that he’s in the race, and spending money on all the consultants and their friends in the political campaign industrial complex. Marketers, ad producers, pollsters, and the whole suite of people who feed like leeches on the body politic swarm any new campaign, hopeful to sink their claws into the meaty flesh of a big campaign war chest.

DeSantis, without the intervention of currently unknown circumstances, cannot wrest the Republican nomination from Donald Trump.  More importantly though, even if he were to somehow capture the support of all the moderates, the NeverTrump/ProjectPedo phalanx, and the entirety of Swamp Republicanism, what he cannot do in 2024 is to win the Presidency.  This is because far too many of Trump’s MAGA coalition recognize the nature of the game DeSantis and others are playing, and simply will not, under any circumstance, support anybody in 2024 who’s name isn’t Donald J. Trump.  It’s really simple.  It’s that simple.  DeSantis and his forthcoming campaign is a scam, brought to you by professional charlatans, but whether DeSantis is knowingly in on the scam or not, he already knows the outcome, and that should deter you from supporting him with your time, money, or vote.

 

Unelected, Unaccountable, but Unrelenting: The Failed GOP Consultancy

Wednesday, September 25th, 2013

Great & Powerful Turdblossom

It seems like a day doesn’t elapse without catching a glimpse of Karl Rove and his whiteboards on FoxNews.  From the sounds of things, you might come to think he’s in charge of something at the GOP.  Unfortunately, while he holds no official office, he’s always working on behalf of his patrons in the party, and he serves the interests of the surrender-monkey wing of the Republican party.  Steve Schmidt, the architect of McCain’s loss in 2008, is another example of the sort of consultant with which DC Republicans seem to surround themselves.  Schmidt is still bitter over his 2008 defeat, and he blames much of it on Sarah Palin.  The truth is that she was the only good thing about the ticket, and exit-polling demonstrated quite clearly at the time that McCain would have done far worse without her on the ticket.  It was Schmidt’s bright idea to have McCain suspend his campaign, and that was precisely the root of the collapse in McCain’s support.  Looking to blame his own strategic failings on somebody – anybody – Schmidt is still on the Palin-hater bandwagon because to regain any credibility in his profession, he must shift blame to somebody else.  These consultants are one of the biggest problems grass-roots conservatives face because they tend to turn candidates against their base, and wonder why they lose.

In an epic rant for Politico, McCain adviser and professional boot-licker Steve Schmidt claimed to feel “deep regret” for helping to fuel the creation of a “freak show” wing of the GOP.  By “freak show” wing, he means you and I.  He means real conservatives.  He is referencing those who rose under the general label of “Tea Party.”  Most of all, in singling out somebody that personifies what he termed “asininity,” he means Sarah Palin.  Said Schmidt:

“For the last couple of years, we’ve had this wing of the party running roughshod over the rest of the party. Tossing out terms like RINO saying we’re going to purge, you know, the moderates out of the party,” Schmidt said. “We’ve lost five U.S. Senate seats over the last two election cycles. And fundamentally we need Republicans, whether they’re running for president, whether they’re in the leadership of the Congress, to stand up against a lot of this asininity.”

“You finally you saw it with Ted Cruz. Maybe he was the one that who’s got a bridge too far,” Schmidt said. “Maybe we’ll start seeing our elected leaders stop being intimidated by this nonsense, have the nerve, have the guts to stand up and … to fight to take conservatism’s good name back from the freak show that’s been running wild for four years and that I have deep regret in my part, certainly, in initiating.”

Psssst. Hey Steve! We should purge you from the party, since there seems to be no other way to have you shut up and go away.  Massive failure doesn’t seem to convince you.  Frankly, the reason Republicans lose elections is because they listen to jerks like Schmidt who view actual conservatives as the problem.  You see, Schmidt doesn’t recognize actual conservatism, but instead views “conservatism” as a label to be shifted onto his clients who in no way match the meaning of the term.  If one wishes to see this at work, consider only the Bush campaigns of 2000 and 2004.   Here, you had Rove positioning Bush as a “compassionate conservative,” when it was evident(or should have been) that Bush wasn’t conservative, and that he would wreck actual conservatism by the false association.  In 2006, when Republicans lost the Congress, it was on the basis of this bastardized notion of conservatism.  The Republicans lost control of Congress because under Bush, they were spending just like big-spending Democrats.  It had been consultants like Schmidt and Rove who led the GOP to that and subsequent defeats.

If you want to know what constitutes a real freak-show in the Republican party, it is the unparalleled spectacle of hucksters in the consultancy class attempting to pass off moderates as conservatives.  It is the inglorious pinnacle of asininity to pretend now that John McCain is conservative, and even more galling to pretend that his policy positions represent conservative principles, and yet con-men like Schmidt labor endlessly to carry out that fraud.  When McCain was up for re-election in 2010, you may remember that the McCain camp had no problem soliciting the help of Sarah Palin, but now they betray her with this nonsense about “freak show” and alleged “asininity.”  McCain might have been beat in the 2010 primaries without her, but does that fact earn even the smallest bit of respect from a hateful little troll like Schmidt?  No.   You see, in his book, it’s all about him.  Admitting that Sarah Palin did more to boost either McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign, or his 2010 Senatorial re-election campaign would be to admit that Schmidt is entirely useless, never mind the candidate in question.

The fact of the matter is that Schmidt and those in the consultancy class like Rove, who infamously once claimed that Palin’s endorsement wasn’t “worth snot” don’t have any credibility.  For all their alleged gifts and talents as political analysts, advisers, and consultants, they don’t seem to have produced results to scale of their fame.  Bush barely managed to prevail over Al Gore in 2000, relying on the electoral college, and in 2004, what should have been a walk-over victory was uncomfortably close against John Kerry, a man who should never be let near the oval office.  Worse, under the guidance of Rove, in 2006, Republicans lost the Congress, permitting Barack Obama to have both Houses in 2009.   We wouldn’t even be talking about Obama-care had the Republicans not joined Democrats in spending like drunks in support of the George W. Bush spending priorities, which had been massive.

It was the participation of Republicans like McCain in the Amnesty kerfuffle of 2007 that helped keep the Republicans in the wilderness too, another great idea from the consultancy wing of the party.  How did that work out for us?  Democrats kept control of Congress, and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid made sure we’d have Obama-care so we could learn what was in it.  We’re learning, and the real lesson we conservatives must take is that these professional beltway consultants and advisers are leading us off a cliff.

There’s no way around it.  If we listen to the likes of Schmidt or Rove, we’re taking advice from people who don’t have our interests at heart.  They’re profiteers on the political process, and they ply their trade by linguistic manipulations.  It’s no surprising that they work hardest to protect their own images, and will stab anybody in the back in order to preserve their own reputations.  In the end, they’re only accountable inasmuch as their political patrons are held accountable.  They aren’t elected, and they never pay the price for shafting the American people.  They are insulated from our direct anger as voters, and they always seem to move on to new patrons if their existing ones fall out of favor with voters.  As long as they’re setting the direction of the Republican party, one shouldn’t expect that the GOP will be friendly to actual conservatives.  They don’t care about our principles, as they pursue profit and power at our expense.  If the last decade has taught us anything, it should be that it is we who are forced to pay for their failures.  Noticing that fact will brand you as part of a “freak show.”