A broken psyche born of(or fortified by) isolation
The first critical ingredient in creating Mass Formation Psychosis is isolation. This is why I know the entire phenomenon was engineered. From the beginning, isolation was one of the key goals of the response to COVID19. Some will argue that this had been medically necessary, but subsequent studies have shown that this form of infectious disease control is an utter failure. Instead, it’s the key step needed to begin creating Mass Formation Psychosis, and as we have seen over these last two years, it’s been quite effective. A report is now out that Justice Gorsuch refused to mask-up for oral arguments, and on this basis, Justice Sotomayor decided to join the oral arguments remotely. She claims to have medical concerns that cause her to wish to avoid unmasked people and crowds, but this teaches us something more interesting about Mass Formation Psychosis. Sonia Sotomayor is a victim of this very phenomenon, and it’s quite plain now that it explains her bizarre statements about COVID, but most of all, she serves as a warning to us all.
How does isolation cause them to fail so utterly in knowing accurate information about COVID? The same factors that cause people who are prohibited from socializing in any respect are at the root of this. Why do you think it was permissible to have necessary shopping permitted in big-box stores, but prohibited in small stores and bars and restaurants. Where do people socialize? Are you more apt to get into a conversation with a small business owner you know by name, and perhaps even fellow customer, down at the local store, or at the big box? Are you more likely to share information freely in some stuffy hospital setting, or at the bar where you and your friends hang out? You see, people will correct one another on simple data points like this, particularly among well-known acquaintances and friends, but they are much less likely to offer contrary opinions to fellow shoppers in a big box store, or to even share their own with others.
Big box stores are impersonal, and your chances of encountering somebody you know personally, or with whom you are at least somewhat acquainted, is very diminished. In your local bar and grill, you’ll probably see the same crowd of people repeatedly. Via some remote session, you’re also much less likely to bother offering contrary opinions and information, because you feel it’s not worth your trouble in many cases, particularly when you’re not entirely familiar with other participants.
The acquaintance and familiarity with others is what creates the comfort-level to share information, opinions, and so on, but in the isolation of your home office, there’s nobody to challenge your ideas, or the information you think you know, so that there’s no self-correcting mechanism when you’re all alone. You will tend to read more closely the information that fits your own notions, while rejecting others, and you will likewise tend to spend your time in a virtual echo-chamber of your own bad information, never questioning any of it. Add to this the remaining steps of Mass Formation Psychosis, and we’re off to the races with madness setting the pace. As a refresher, those basic steps are:
Isolation (Lockdowns)
The removal of rights and privileges (Where you can go, with who and how many, and in what circumstances)
Create fear and anxiety (We’re ALL GOING TO DIE!!! ARRRGHHH!)
Provide only one viable solution as prescribed by an authority figure (Isolation, Masks, and Vaccines : Fauci(as a proxy for all “public health” professionals)
With this in mind, looking at the foolishness of Sotomayor and Breyer, to name just two, it’s clear how this happens. Once these people were isolated during the lockdowns, they were easy prey for Mass Formation Psychosis. Once you realize that Sotomayor is really just another victim of this madness, it’s easier to make sense of her baffling, idiotic assertions. The worse part about this is that people so afflicted cannot be easily extricated from it. They’re locked-in, and they act as confirmation for one another. It’s maddening. Brick walls are easier to convince of a thing.
Every parent needs to see this. They need to know, right now: Masking and locking down harms your baby. Babies learn and develop intellectually by seeing and interacting with the faces of the adults and others around them. The Brown University study cited in the New York Post finds that the mean IQ dropped by 21 points. Folks, in the old standards, in older psychology text books going back a few decades before political correctness overran everything, and before the term “mental retardation” was considered a slur, an IQ lower than 80 was frequently classed as being “mildly retarded.” What’s worse is that the problem is permanent, and that the deficit in learning capacity is difficult to overcome the longer the isolation, masking and all the rest of the lockdown measures go on. Worse, it’s not easily recoverable, if at all. For eighteen months, Democrats and education officials have been pushing this lockdown/masking agenda. They’re literally dumbing-down your babies with your compliance. I’ve told you that I have believed we are under a widespread attack. Now we know your babies are also targets, and that by masking them, isolating them, and otherwise depriving them of natural early intellectual development, these babies are being stunted to a level that is more than harmful: This is catastrophic.
Imagine 20 years hence when you have a whole generation of barely functional adults whose mean IQ is twenty percent lower. In addition to the damage done to them personally, consider the damage that will be done to our entire society. This is abominable. These lockdown are and have always been abusive. Now we know they damage children for all their lives.
This MUST STOP NOW. Your babies must not be subjected to masked faces. Subjecting your children to this, particularly your infants and toddlers, is doing permanent harm to them.
Some health professionals and many activists have warned of this consequence for young children and babies since the beginning of the masking. Now, there’s no longer any doubt.
I love most of the doctors who’ve ever rendered care to me and mine in my times of need, whether routine check-ups or things of a more serious nature. Unfortunately, every doctor cannot be the most competent doctor in the practice, the clinic, or in the hospital. Not every surgeon can be the most skilled, talented medical artist. Not every person in any segment of the medical fields can be the most able in their specialty. Human skills and talents simply aren’t distributed that way. Unfortunately, neither is the indispensable virtue of courage. What this “pandemic” has taught me, perhaps more than anything, is that rather than being the people most trustworthy in my world, I now trust the medical profession only slightly more than politicians, reporters, and bureaucrats. What the medical community has done over the last eighteen months is astonishingly scandalous. Some people, like Dr. Anthony Fauci, at the upper echelons of the medical bureaucracy should go to jail for their misfeasance or malfeasance, but in the main, the biggest failure in the medical professions has been among the group we ought to have been able to trust above all others: The doctors. Physicians should have observed their Hippocratic oaths. Doctors should have been the tempering speed-break that stilled the panic and gave reason in the midst of madness. A very few brave souls tried, but they were demolished for their efforts. They were ostracized and silenced in social media, and in the media generally. Those few gave a valiant effort, and they are to be commended. If you’re looking for the assistance of a physician, seek one of them out, because only they dared tell the truth. This story isn’t about them, however, or the good works they performed. It is about the failure of their brothers and sisters in medicine, who failed, who fell to their knees in supplication before the juggernaut, and bent science to the will of a political mob. This is not a story about the brave few who stood against the storm, but instead, about the greater number of them who faded and faltered, betraying their patients in the greatest calamity every visited upon the field of public health in human history. It has been a man-caused catastrophe.
For me, it began early on in the so-called pandemic. I already had begun to fear that this was being exploited for political purposes. I saw how the media was behaving, and I knew instinctively that there was something terribly wrong with the narrative we were being fed. For one thing, the narrative kept changing. For another, the recommendations seemed almost random at times, and they didn’t seem to comport with simple science and basic logic. I, along with countless others, began to ask questions like: “Do we have an antibody test for this contagion?” Alternatively, “Do masks even work?” “What good is social distancing?” Then people began to research the PCR test, and it was discovered that the PCR test was likely to generate high false positive rates, maybe greater than ninety-five percent. Even the Lancet admitted it was probably at least 50-75%. Questions along this line were dismissed. Hospitals began to shut down all “elective surgeries,” which isn’t merely face-lifts and so on as some people seem wrongly to believe. If you’re stable but waiting on some very serious surgeries, for very serious conditions, they can be rated as “elective” even though without them, eventually, the condition requiring the surgery may well kill you. Large numbers of hospital employees were furloughed. Whole wards were shut down. None of it made any damned sense. It was as if they were waiting for the wounded to come in from a terrible battle, but the terrible battle hadn’t happened.
Then people began to notice oddities in the reporting. People were being reported as COVID deaths, who died in hospice facilities. They were in the end stages of terrible cancers, and they were tested daily, sometimes many times daily for COVID, and even if the damned PCR test never did give a positive result, they’d get a doctor to “diagnose” it based on symptomology and call it a contributing factor in the inevitable deaths. One elderly gentleman who lived very near me pulled out in front of a tractor-trailer hauling a load of gravel on a 75mph highway. There wasn’t much left of his folded-up pickup truck, but they managed to swab his lifeless body and declare him dead of COVID. These stories happened all over. People who blew their brains out with shotguns were tested “positive” with PCR swabs and their deaths recorded as COVID deaths. People who fell off buildings were diagnosed as COVID deaths. In one recent “adjustment” to statistics, Alameda County California admitted it had at least 441 cases scored and counted as COVID deaths that most assuredly were not, reducing the county’s COVID death count by twenty-five percent! This whole gruesome fraud went on, and in most places, is STILL happening. Where are our scientific professionals? Where are the doctors? Why weren’t they speaking-out?
Money is a powerful motivator, and it’s frequently seen at the root of many human failures of character. Often times, what we perceive as cowardice is only the sort of cowardice born of “fear of a loss of compensation.” For many people, that’s quite enough. Ladies and gentlemen, our medical doctors, for all their education, scientific training, and Hippocratic oaths, are just people, and they’re subject to the same foibles, flaws, and outright failings found in any other segment of our society. The problem is that most of us trust them, because they have the credentials, and they’re employed in hospitals and clinics, or they have their own practices, and we see them as the top of the food chain. Those in their own practices are certainly less subject to pressures of the corporate sorts, but not entirely. That in mind, remember that most of us see doctors employed in vast medical systems, corporate hospitals, and medicals systems. The bigger the institution, the more prone they are to exhibiting these pressures on their employees, and even on their doctors. Even then-CDC Director Redfield admitted that there is a strong perverse incentive built into the system.
There isn’t a doctor among them who doesn’t know that a virus is many times smaller than the pores in those common masks, never mind the various cloth contraptions people sported throughout the course of the “pandemic.” Not one. In truth, if you want to know whether you can trust your doctor, next time you visit, ask him or her bluntly: “Does this mask I’m wearing provide any protection from airborne SARS-CoV2?” If they give you any other answer than “no,” you can know your doctor is lying. If they tell you something about “virus carried in exhaled particulates,” you might give them a pass if they specify a certain grade of mask, but you should press the issue: “Will this silly cloth mask I’m wearing protect me from inhaling a coronavirus floating around in the air in this room?” If they tell you “yes,” they’re lying to you. The reason for the lie is irrelevant. Whether it’s because they’ve bought the lies themselves, or because they’re following the company line, or because they’ve been squeezed into it by peers and social pressure, the particular motive matters not. All that matters is the net effect: They’ve told you an incredible lie. I’m not telling you to have a confrontation with them. Just accept their answer, and know that anything this doctor ever tells you, from that date forward, and probably any time in the past, must be considered as possible false information. You should definitely find another doctor who will not lie to you. Since the scale of the failure of the medical profession has been so profound, you may have quite the chore before you. If you want to, you can always preface your question with an implicit warning: “Doctor, I need to ask you a question, and I suppose you could consider it a test of sorts, and your answer will remain between you and I alone: Does this silly cloth mask I’m wearing afford me any real protection from airborne coronaviruses?” At least this way, the doctor will know from the outset that you expect perfect frankness within the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship. Whatever his or her answer, you’ll know what sort of doctor you have.
Here’s a quick youtube video to demonstrate the difference in scale among viruses, including COVID19, and the masks that allegedly impede them:
I realize there will be a large number of doctors who will spit and sputter in objection after reading what I’ve said here, but let me tell you something else: I don’t care. I’m entitled to my opinion, and by any estimation I’m able to make, any doctor who will participate in all the lies we’ve endured in the last eighteen months isn’t worth a puddle of pond-scum, never mind having the temerity to object to my calling them on it. Yes, I fully understand the pressure they’re under, but I also expect them, of all people, to have the moral fortitude to reject and overcome the pressure.
Many of these same doctors are being pressured to get you to take one of the available vaccines. I will tell you how I answered one clinician recently:
“Will you and the hospital sign a release accepting all liability for any injury, death, disability, or disease I might suffer as a result of this vaccine you’re recommending? No? Then why do you recommend it? You have your answer.”
You see, one of the principles in medicine is that you, the patient, have an absolute right to refuse treatment of any sort. It’s also true that you have a right to expect that your doctor will prescribe treatments and medicines that will not cause you unnecessary harm, and no harm they didn’t warn you was a possibility first. This is called “informed consent.” It’s not simply that you were permitted to choose whether or not to take the medicine/vaccine, but that you were given sufficient information to evaluate its relative safety or danger to your person. The vaccines currently being used for COVID19 are all being used only under an Emergency Use Authorization, and are in fact only experimental vaccines. Yes, you’re the proposed Guinea pigs. I will not tell you what you should do about any vaccine. You’re presumably adults and if you’re able to find your way to this website, I’m certain you’re able to research vaccines. I will tell you that under no circumstances I can now foresee, will I be taking any of the vaccines currently offered as alleged preventatives against infections with SARS-CoV2, a.k.a COVID19, a.k.a. the FauciVirus. You do you.
I had always hoped that the medical profession was populated with people of amazing skills and talents and moral courage. While there is undoubtedly no shortage of skill and talent, what I’ve learned over the last eighteen months is that the people in these fields are no less apt to fall prey to the same sorts of moral and ethical failings as anybody else. The Hippocratic oath, if taken as seriously as intended, ought to imbue its professors with at least an elevated sense of the criticality of their honesty in dealing with patients, but as in so many other fields where a higher standard ought to be expected, the practitioners often fail to clear the bar. What we have seen with some of the disclosures of the Fauci emails is that “science” is just a corruptible and corrupted as any endeavor into which greed and political power are introduced. Peer-reviewed science has made a mortal blow to its own credibility, and just like with the Climate Change hogwash, what we find is that in pursuit of the research grant dollars, or for the approval of the mob, or for the sake of simply keeping one’s job, science is eminently corruptible. What the last eighteen months ought to have made plain, to our disappointment and disgust, is that the medical profession is steered and swayed by these same forces, and always to the detriment of real medical science and honest patient care. Your lives and liberties were at stake, and in the main, to the largest extent, the medical profession failed you, and mostly because doctors would not stand on their feet, stick their chests out, harden their jaws, and take the punch, unyielding and unafraid. This is another area in which we are going to need to force a clean-up, since at least to date, the profession at large has shown no such inclination. It’s crushing. It’s a little like discovering that the spouse you’ve loved and cherished for decades has been routinely stepping-out on you every week throughout the course of your whole marriage. Some people I know trust their doctors more than their spouses. It’s one more instance of betrayal in a year’s worth of them. If you’re a physician, and you feel like this is aimed at you, maybe it is.
Editors Note: I realize that there are many people other than doctors in the medical sciences, but it is the doctor with the lab-coat and the stethoscope that has come to symbolize the profession, in large measure because they are the accepted, learned authorities in the field, and because it is upon their recommendations that we follow courses of care and medication. Nobody sets out to make an appointment to see a nurse, or an x-ray technician, or a phlebotomist. Those are generally people we interact with along the path to seeing, or after having seen a doctor. Pharmacists don’t write prescriptions. The whole of the medical field revolves around the physicians. It is in they who we place our trust and our lives. It is to they to whom we entrust our children’s care. It is they who should lead the way in cleaning this mess up, and it should start immediately.
I know there have been a number of good physicians who’ve stood against the tide. I know how they’ve suffered. Rather than endlessly listing all the doctors here who’ve failed you in the last eighteen months, I’d prefer that any such comments list only doctors who didn’t fail. I would prefer that if you’re going to name doctors in the comments here, you focus on those who stood and did the right thing, if you know any.
