I’m going to be blunt. I want every little tyrannical cretin who loves the exercise of state power to understand me. I will not take your vaccine. I will never mask again. If you want to try to coerce me, I will respond with force. If you think you can force me, send your best. Send a lot of them. I will not submit. Others are free to lay down their liberties like the sackless weanies so many in our culture have become. That’s freedom of choice. I don’t want to hear any whining later. You can cajole, and you can try to stigmatize me, but be careful. The moment you cross the line into attempted coercion or compulsion of any sort, I am likely to respond in kind. This is my life. You don’t get to walk all over it on the basis of your pretended “public health emergency,” or any other damnable excuse. You’re free to posit all the arguments you would like to make, but the moment you shift the conversation from persuasion to coercion, all bets are off. In truth, I feel badly for all the poor fools who’ve already submitted and will submit yet again. They’re scared, and that’s understandable to a degree, but at some point, if you are to be a sovereign human being, secure in your life, and liberties, there comes a moment when you must declare your unwillingness to submit. Joe Biden and his brigade of malevolent morons can advocate anything they like, but I will not be pushed. My answer is as sure as the sunrise, and I will defend it. The answer is “NO.”
No, I will not mask. I’m not wearing your face-diapers any longer. That’s over and done. I humored the nonsensical requirements for the first several months of this so-called “pandemic,” but I am not inclined to humor them further. The evidence is in: Masks are ineffective. If you’re a terrified irrational, incapable of math, statistical analysis, or other form of investigatory inquiry, I no longer wish to salve your emotional incontinence. Suck it up. If you think you can compel me to mask, feel free to try. I believe in the absolute right to self-defense against all trespasses against my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Don’t send some poor government agent who will be inclined to follow orders to keep his or her job, but instead, have the guts to show up on your own behalf. If you’re one of those government agents, you need to ask yourself if you think it’s worth it. You need to ask yourself whether following illegal, unconstitutional, immoral orders will later excuse you. You need to ask yourself if these are the sorts of people for whom you’re willing to lay down your lives, needlessly. These people aren’t defending anything. I am. If you wish to be the offensive strike-force of tyrants, just know that’s what you’ve chosen, and accept openly all that goes with it.
No, I will not be vaccinated with any of these fake vaccines. They do not function like a standard vaccine, and their mechanism of operation has not been demonstrated to be safe orefficacious over the long run. They haven’t been tested, and insufficient data exists to guarantee their safety. More, the government has given the manufactures an exemption from liability. This is why they’re covered by an Emergency Use Authorization. There is nothing in the manner of their function that conveys actual immunity to COVID19 or anything else, at least over the long run. Again, I refer you to the strong work of Dr. Richard Fleming. There are many possible adverse reactions and deaths associated with the vaccine, although they’re now scrambling to hide it. I’m all about personal freedom, and adults are and should be free to pour as much poison into their bodies as they desire, but compulsion or coercion crosses the line. In the case of minor children, parents are the “deciders” and I think any parent permitting their child to be injected with this garbage is a child-abuser. It’s one thing to take a vaccine yourself, but it’s another to inject your child with it, having no knowledge of the long-run effects and potential death you might be inflicting. Roll the dice with your own lives. I will not accept a vaccine for myself. I will defend myself vigorously against all attempts to compel or coerce me to take the vaccination. I will not take a vaccine while I remain alive or until a satisfactory body of unadulterated, independent data convinces me otherwise, but no such body of data does or can exist for at least five to ten years. So long as I am capable of any form of resistance, I will defend myself against such aggression, and there is no form of resistance I will refrain from using should it become necessary to mount such a defense.
At this point, I want it plainly understood: Attempts to compel me to mask or vaccinate will be met with force in the name of self-defense. I will not have violence enacted upon me or threatened against me in the name of your great reset, your depopulation schemes, your political power-plays, your profit-motives, or any other form of wet dream you might be contemplating, whomever you may be. As Dan Bongino says, “Cutesy-time is over.” You have a choice. You can resist, submit, or try to lurk and watch from the sidelines. You can join the tyrants who are trying to impose this. The choice is yours, whatever you do, but the beginning of the end is at hand. This will be resolved, one way or the other. There will be no more hiding naked aggression behind a patronizing smile, and I am going to require you to the aggression into the daylight. Your coercion requires my consent, but I do not give it. If you wish to compel or force me, bring it. Bring it all. My answer remains a belligerent “NO!”
When one thinks about what form the post-COVID word will take, one thing nags at me above all others. All of these public officials who have been willing to strip from us our civil liberties, often without any legitimate authority to do so, will be left in place to do this to us again the next time somebody decides “necessity” demands it. I don’t care if they’re Republican or Democrat or Independent. I don’t care whether they’re a lowly County Commissioner, a County judge, a mayor, a school superintendent, or a Governor. None of these people have the authority they’ve seized, and as courts continue to make that point abundantly clear, I think it’s up to us to examine our own behaviors in response to these various mandates, decrees, and executive dicta that have so thoroughly demolished American life. We must never permit this again, and indeed, we must put a stop to its continuance now. In order to see this through is going to require an active, rebellious citizenry, unwilling to suffer any more of the indignities being heaped upon us. We must rid ourselves of all the petty tyrants, big and small. We must leave none of them with any power to do this again. We must punish them, and we must teach them a lesson: Our liberties are not disposable, nor are our lives, our livelihoods, our businesses, or even our leisure activities. This is our country, and to preserve it, we must throw off all of these dictators-in-waiting. If they made mask mandates, closed down businesses, ordered school closures, or took any other action that restricted the lives and movements of Americans, they must be removed. All of them.
Early on Tuesday, I had been watching the most recent video on YouTube by the creator Amazing Polly, entitled It’s Your Funeral. She’s Canadian, but she has a strong affinity for America, and I think she recognizes that if Americans won’t fight, her country will easily be subsumed into whatever global catastrophes to which America falls. In particular, in this video, one of the things she addresses that caught my attention was her discussion of the psychology of isolation, and of tyranny. You can view the section of the video I’m referencing below. The portion on which I’d like to focus runs from approximately the 9:02 to the 27:02 timestamps. You may wish to skip ahead to the 9:00 mark:
https://youtu.be/GP6mApouvAw?t=539
Polly’s point is an important one. In fact, I’d like to expand on it, because I’ve observed a phenomenon since the onset of the various lock-downs and mask-mandates that troubles me greatly. She mentions the Milgrim Electric Shock experiment, and she gives a decent explanation of the basic premises that inquiry investigated. Basic human psychology doesn’t really change much, because we’re wired the same as people who lived one-hundred or one-thousand years ago, despite the artifices all our modern technology provides. What’s most interesting about the experiment is how rapidly people become desensitized to the infliction of pain on others, how accepting of isolation they become, and just how readily people, all people, can be persuaded by authorities to do the most egregious things to one another.
This is even more remarkably distinct among people who already live and work in a martial or quasi-martial environment, like military or police. It’s quite plausible, based on my experiences and observations that people in those environments, already inculcated and indoctrinated to take orders and execute them more or less unquestioningly to pick up on this behavior even more readily than their civilian counterparts. Of course, it’s not just police and military, but also any hierarchical structure, like education or medicine, where this becomes a problem. Accustomed to following orders handed-down from on high, people in those fields are potentially just as dangerous when under such demands. Obedience and compliance become the keys to survival within such institutions, and it is this that, more than any other thing, should concern us when regarding all of these would-be dictators at the state and local levels. People who can uncritically accept specious “science” which on one day tells you masks are pointless but on the next tells you they are indispensable in stopping the spread of a virus are just the sort of persons who should never be entrusted with or granted any power over their fellow man.
It’s been asked in innumerable forms how it was possible for the German people to permit the holocaust. While I am not here directly comparing mask orders to the holocaust, what I seek to examine is the basic human psychology that permits either. You see, we have had countless incidents of otherwise innocent and peaceable people being accosted by authorities in one form or another for refusing to wear masks, or maintain strict “social distance.” See below for one recent example:
I’m quite afraid of what might have happened had I been present for this. I don’t believe I’d have been able to sit by and watch this assault go on. I’m as big a supporter of law enforcement as any, but this behavior by this school resource officer was completely unjustified. I don’t care what else is said about this incident, but the fact that an armed man was willing to use [less] lethal force(NOT non-lethal) against an unarmed woman for the “crime” of not wearing a mask when she’s clearly well beyond six feet from anybody not related to her is ridiculous. Frankly, none of the powers of arrest or force should ever have come into play here. The officer should be fired. His credentials should be stripped. Every person in the chain of command between him and the Governor of Ohio should be removed from their offices, forcibly if need be, and they should all be charged for varying degrees of criminality. What was done in this case was a complete demolition of this woman’s civil liberties, and the institution directly responsible should be made to pay compensation. If she is not able to obtain satisfaction by legal means, she would be morally justified in almost any action she would thereafter take in response. She is entitled to her pound of flesh.
Will you suggest to me otherwise? Stop! Please leave my website. You don’t belong here. You don’t need to read anything I’ve heretofore written. You’re not fully human, and your willingness to submit to this idiocy is all the evidence I need of your inhumanity. Law is important, critical in fact, but it is not everything and cannot substitute for morality, but for those of you who would happily go along with this woman’s abuse at the hands of the authorities, you are morally no different from the dirt-bags in Germany who went along with their atrocities. Yes, I agree that the degree is different, but the underlying psychology, the premise underlying and justifying this action is really no different. You are every bit as dangerous to your fellow man as the SS officer who shot Jews on command and dumped them into a mass grave. I mean that. All of it.
If, on the other hand, you find, as do I, that this had been an unconscionable abuse of authority and power, I must ask: “What are you doing about it?” What are any of us doing about it? You see, this is the real problem. I’m more than one-thousand miles remote from this taser incident, but I’m aware of it. The people of South Central Ohio are aware of it. What are they doing about it? Herein lies the problem: We all find excuses to remain uninvolved. People, this is happening in America! This is happening in YOUR COUNTRY! This isn’t happening in some third-world S-hole, although given their preferences, the left will surely turn it into one.
My larger point here is that as Polly argues, we must not let our humanity be stolen from us, and we must be willing to make a stink. Beyond that, we must be willing to fight against this entire monstrosity. Our liberties don’t evaporate because there’s a virus, whether it’s extremely virulent, or spread only through intimate contact. Our rights don’t get suspended because some tin-pot dictator-wannabe says so. The problem is that when all this finally ends, if we leave these people in place, they’ll be emboldened to do this to us again in the next emergency. Some of them have grown to like this power they’ve managed to seize, and from our perspective, the problem is that in our willingness to comply for our safety and those of our loved-ones, we’ve too easily ceded too much ground, and too willingly watched as abuses of citizens goes on unabated. I don’t understand how the school resource officer in the video above didn’t find himself surrounded by a bunch of citizens explaining to him that he’d better back off, or else. I don’t understand it. Where are the men, by the way?
Our society is collapsing in part because men have become neutered and indifferent; emasculated and impotent, morally much more than physically. I fear for our nation because now we live in a society in which tin-pot punks with official titles hand down orders and edicts, while ostensibly free men and women simply comply. What sort of people have we become? What else will we accept when pressed? Is there no limit to the indignities we will suffer on the say-so of some dimwit who mustered a majority of voters in some small county in an off-year election? It’s time to reject all of this. President Trump was right to say that we mustn’t let COVID19 dominate our lives. He was right to lead from the front, rather than shout orders up from the Presidential bunker, like so many others. None of us get a second lifetime, and watching it bleed away in isolation offers no consolation. I’m done with the lock-down now. One way or the other, it’s over. Come what may. I will not be reduced to the sort of cringing loser who will surrender the right to console my aged mother, nor the sort of hapless mealy-mouth who helplessly watches a mother be assaulted by a power-hungry bureaucrat with a badge and a taser. It’s not happening. I hope my fellow Americans will join me in rejecting this “new normal” before it morphs into something more insidious. Those public officials who have handed down and enforced such orders must go, and the purge must begin today. What they’ve demonstrated is that they are too willing to abuse citizens on the basis of orders in pursuit of public policies that violate our constitutional rights, and that is a sin we cannot tolerate, and a treason against us we must not permit.
The scandal of the Nashville, Tennessee Mayor hiding the statistics on COVID19 infections related to bars is the same scenario playing-out around the country. They sold the bar closures and restaurant closures because, they claimed, you’re more likely to get infected in those places. If I can go to Walmart and avoid infection, I can assure you that I can go to a bar and do the same. If I can go to Home Depot while avoiding COVID19, I am certain I can avoid it in a restaurant. Those of you who have had your suspicions about the real drivers of our national reaction to COVID19/WuFlu have been right to raise an eyebrow over the things we’re being told. The real reason we’re not supposed to be in restaurants and bars is because apart from eating and drinking, there’s one central purpose of going to such places: Socializing. Restaurants and bars are the locations of informal conversations, where information is passed from one person to the next, outside the control of media or official channels. If you’ve begun to suspect that this could be the purpose of these shutdowns, you’d be right. If you’ve noticed that some so-called “red state” governors seem to be following this same general approach, you’d be right to question them. You see, when all is said and done, COVID19 has been the instrument of your isolation and ignorance. It’s also been the source of your greatest distraction throughout 2020. Nothing has caused the average person to spend more useless time on more useless activities. Nothing has done more to isolate us in a social sense. This is why even at this late date, and in the face of mounting evidence, the bars must remain closed.
It’s part of the strategy to keep you in the dark. You see, you might be sitting at the bar discussing the various privations caused, not by COVID19 itself, but all the foolish measures being used allegedly to combat it. You might point out, for instance, that the CDC said these face-masks will do nothing to protect you from the smoke of the wildfires in California, Oregon, and Washington. Since the Coronavirus is as small or smaller than the particulate matter that constitutes smoke, it’s hard for reasonable people to ignore the fact that against Coronavirus, masks wouldn’t be any more effective. Conversations like this are verboten, and will likely get you banned or at least suspended in social media. In a bar, or a restaurant, such conversations aren’t going to be hushed. Do you see? They can control social media. They do control the news media. They are the official channels. The Democrats and big media, along with the tech sector are in collusion. The only way for them to succeed was to present you a narrative and make sure nothing contradicted it. They’re closing off all avenues on-line and in media. Without the bar and restaurant shutdown, along with all the other mass assemblies we are currently forbidden from attending, we have no way to communicate among ourselves. With church services shut down in many places, you can’t even talk to your fellow congregants. This has all been about isolating you politically. Until Donald Trump decided to re-label his rallies “peaceful protests,” they had him shut down too.
You can read the story at Breitbart in full, but there is more reporting on it elsewhere. The point here is to understand why. Why would they hide that? Why would they want to isolate you?
Folks, it’s never been about the virus. It’s always been about the election.
Virologist Li-Meng Yan published her entire report on Zenoda.org. The report is available at this link. Additionally, I’ve inserted the report here for ease of access:
The report is highly technical, but her methodology seems straight forward. She identifies the places at which the genome of COVID19 has been spliced together. Basically, my lay-person’s understanding is that it’s clear from examination of the virus in detail that some cut-and-paste work went on with this virus. Think of it like photo-shopping Hillary Clinton’s head onto Godzilla. In genetic terms, that’s what her report seems to indicate. This explains her use of the term “Frankenstein” to describe the virus.
All of this is quite troubling, but what’s more troubling still is that the entirety of social media and the tech giants seems to be doing the bidding of China as they race to scrub her work from the Internet, or remove her from their sites, and also to attack her work with smears having no relation to her actual paper.
It’s not as though Dr. Yan is some sort of kook or conspiracy theorist, although they’re now rushing to paint her as such.
Why would all of these companies be working so hard to conceal this from you?
I thought they believed in “following the science.” Apparently, the only science they wish to follow is that which suits their narratives. Or China’s.
This is amazing, and quite dangerous in a “free society.” It’s garden-variety disinformation in a communist country.
When Dallas Judge Eric Moyé demanded that Salon a la Mode owner Shelley Luther apologize for her “selfishness,” he revealed himself as a despicable altruist. Altruists demand that people must live their lives for the sake of others, and must forfeit their liberties, properties, and lives when it is deemed necessary or otherwise in the “public interest.” Shelley’s only error in this entire fiasco was in innocently agreeing to the sickening premise of the worthless judge: She contended that she did not see it as selfishness inasmuch as her chief concern lied with making a living to assist her in feeding her children, therefore refusing to apologize. This courageous woman has been through quite enough at the hands of a system gone wild, so it is understandable that she would claim not to have been selfish. To Shelley Luther, let me say quite bluntly: You were indeed selfish, and you had every right to be, and the judge who sat there chastising you for your selfishness ought to be hauled off to a jail for the sake of the rest of us. Judge Eric Moyé is a despicable animal, a scumbag of the worst sort, and I don’t need to know a single thing about his resume or his career on the bench to say so. In this case, in which he sentenced Ms. Luther to a week in jail, he demonstrated everything we need to know about his unfitness for the bench. His actions in this case make quite clear that he knows nothing of justice, and the case makes it quite clear that Judge Moyé is defecating on the entire concept of justice in Texas.
Ms. Luther might not understand my meaning, and I suppose it’s quite natural, given the state of our society and polity, that she might not have a point of reference for what I shall now explain. First, I shall ask a series of questions:
Whose Salon is it?
Whose earnings are at stake?
Whose property is at stake?
Whose livelihood is at stake?
The welfare of whose children are at stake?
The answer to all of these is quite clearly: “Shelley Luther’s.” In most accurate answer to the robed demon squatting imperiously on a bench, paid for, in part, by the efforts of Ms. Luther’s self-interest, Ms. Luther should have said:
I love my life. I love all the great and wonderful things my life and my efforts in its name have produced, and among those things are my children, my business, my associates, my clientele, my home, and all the other things my own efforts have garnered for me and helped me to build, so that if the accusation is that I had been selfish in re-opening my business in the furtherance of all I love, and that my love of my life and all these enriching fulfillments of it are to be adjudged as selfishness, then yes, I am unashamedly selfish, and I will not apologize for any of it, and I further state to the hearing of the world that any court, or any law, that would damn me or condemn me for my rightful selfishness to my love and my life may not rightfully claim the name of justice on this good Earth, and must be banished straight to Hell for the crime it is against all humanity, and if this declaration is to serve as the evidence of my contempt for this court, then let the record show that there is not enough contempt within the four walls of this room, or the four corners of this good Earth to enclose the span of the contempt with which I now respond to this court’s sick demand for an apology for all that I cherish and all that I love.
Ms. Luther had every reason to refuse to apologize, but she should not disclaim the selfishness. She should be proud of it. She had every right to be selfish. If she loves her children, and she values their welfare ahead of the interests of a tyrannical state, she is expressing an entirely selfish love, and she is rightfully entitled to it.
I am disgusted by this worthless judge, and by the system that has empowered him to dispose of the lives of Americans who had committed NO CRIME.
I want Judge Eric Moyé to know in no uncertain terms that he is the enemy of liberty, and the enemy of every living Texan. He is not an officer of justice, but a purveyor of injustice, and had he any honor, he would surrender his robe and his bench and relinquish them for all days. As it is, Judge Moyé is a greedy worthless bastard. He must be removed from the bench by whatever legal means are at the disposal of the people of Texas.
I want Governor Greg Abbott to know that he has culpability in all of this, having empowered dirt-bags like Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins to prey upon the people of Texas, to use whatever power he has under the Texas Constitution to pardon Ms. Luther and to commute her sentence, lest he be eligible to all the same remedies. This is not justice. Texans have a right to their lives, their liberties, and their livelihoods, and as a former Attorney General, he should have known better than to have participated in this over-hyped madness during which the rights of Americans, and Texans, were subordinated to the demands of a mob. He’s as guilty as Judge Moyé, for his role in this blasphemously despicable attack on liberty. Fix it. Americans in general, but Texans especially, should never be reduced to the state of groveling in front of a worthless scum like Judge Moyé to beg for their rights or their freedoms, and Abbott had damned-well better do something about it.
Of all the things to come out of this #WuFlu #FakePanic #Plannedemic is the degree to which some Americans so cavalierly cast aside their fellow Americans with their crass terminology. This is especially true of the dictatorially-minded bureaucrats and elected officials who dared to consider some Americans and some business activities as “Non-essential.” To all those public officials, elected, appointed, and otherwise subsisting on the government dole, I have a question: Who in the HELL are YOU to tell ANYBODY who is or isn’t “essential,” or what business activities are “necessary.”
I don’t like to use expletives, but this whole situation has me sorely tempted to use some. For the sake of my readers, I will therefore restrain the immoderate impulses currently pushing me in the direction of a curse-laden tirade, but I must say that I find you public officials to be despicable. I find your dismissal of your fellow Americans beyond disrespectful, and the callous nature by which you simply devalue their lives and their fortunes as “non-essential.”
What is it to be “non-essential?” It means you aren’t really needed. You’re like the gravy on the potatoes, or the ketchup on the burger. You might be nice to have under some conditions, but otherwise, you’re not needed. Think of the people damning their fellow Americans as “non-essential.” Can you think of a more wretchedly arrogant and COMPLETELY unnecessary group of jackasses? Of all the things another human could call me and my pursuits, none is more offensive to me than “non-essential.” It’s the ultimate term of derision that cares not for race or sex or orientation or age, but merely the estimate of your worth in the eyes of some elite jackass. Rather than being discriminated against due to some innate characteristic, you’re being discriminated against based on somebody’s perverse estimate of your worth!
Let me be more direct: NONE OF YOU ARE ESSENTIAL, you bunch of hypocritical jackasses without whom we could live quite nicely. WE DON’T NEED YOU.
YOU EXIST FOR US! FOR US! FOR US!!!!!
IF we’re “Non-essential,” then by God, so are you, and if we are to be disposed with the wave of a hand and the scorn of the term “non-essential,” then I WANT EVERY ONE OF YOU ELECTED JACKASSES GONE!
Does that clarify the matter? For what do we need YOU if WE aren’t essential? WE pay the freight. WE pay for your salaries. WE do. If WE are “NON-ESSENTIAL,” then EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU CAN GO STRAIGHT TO HELL because you’re completely unnecessary.
The next time the word “non-essential” crosses your minds, you’d best grab it before it crosses your lips. The next public official who mouths that phrase in my proximity might just get more than a harsh talking-to if this term of intense derision is used in my presence.
It’s 2020. Times change, we’re told. Fine. Start with this one. The new N-Word you’d better not use to describe another American or their profession is “Non-essential.”
The whole thing is a put-on. I don’t mean there isn’t a virus, but the whole over-hyped panic is just that. On Thursday, this past week, I saw that there were real signs that the fog was lifting. People were beginning to question the whole thing. It’s not that anybody thinks Coronavirus 2019 isn’t real, but that the statistics were being questioned, and the models were being questioned, and finally, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx were being questioned. More, the reality of the unemployment numbers was coming to light, as an additional 6.6 million Americans added to the unemployment rolls that had already surged by 3.3 million the week before. That’s basically 10 million Americans, whose jobs are gone. More, businesses are now going belly-up, unable to sustain themselves in a shutdown or even skeleton-crew condition. Real people, with real businesses are losing their businesses, not because they did anything wrong, but because of some order by a government official. Those officials will all claim sovereign immunity to any lawsuits, but no matter what anybody claims, it is a real “taking” as the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Fifth Amendment defines it. They’re being wrecked, and their employees will have no jobs to which they can return. This must end. On Thursday, the American people finally realized it, and began to say so. Now, finally, two days later, it seems our President, already inclined to think along these lines, seemed to have gotten the message. In a lengthy briefing on Saturday, he said “We have to open…” He said it more than once.
After the debacle of the Fauci/Birx reliance on the statistical models, some of which were provided purportedly by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, people were beginning to question not only the obvious distance between projected death rates and reality, but also some of the underlying stories used to sell the panic. One YouTuber, channel name: AmazingPolly, who is an excellent researcher found some interesting problems with the video package prepared by the NYTimes about the catastrophe happening at the Elmhurst, Queens NY hospital. What’s interesting is that the video is now all in question. CBS famously aired footage that looked like a serious situation, allegedly in NYC, but actually from Italy. Other footage and stills showed lines of coffins that were actually from a movie. The media is a pure propaganda arm of the Democrat Party. At this point, it truly is the Democrat-Media Complex. The idea is to sell panic. The idea is to push the country as far down into the ditch as is humanly possible, because there’s really no other way for them to defeat President Trump. They’re willing to wreck America to get rid of him, and to cause the death of additional Americans if necessary. There’s really no bottom to their black hole of hatred for this country. They see Trump and his supporters as the last obstacle to vanquishing America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, forever. This is not hyperbole. They hate us that much.
I will tell you that the longer I observe the whole of our national polity, I am continually amazed at how absolutely disgusting is our so-called “Mainstream Media.” Sarah Palin had them pegged when she called them “Lamestream,” but lately, they seem to be more diabolical than that.
Back to the hospital in Elmhurst, Queens, why would they choose that hospital to target for their big scare story? On whom would this have the greatest effect? Amazing Polly figures that out for us, if we hadn’t guessed who might be from Queens, NY, who might be the target of a media disinformation campaign:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAnSkQojE_4
Every time I get the chance, I thank Polly for her work via Twitter. This video deserves a thorough watching. She admits up front that she can’t necessarily prove all of her conclusions, but she is always careful to provide documentation for the material she presents, in the information attached to her videos on YouTube. You can follow her on Twitter @99freemind. I don’t necessarily agree with her on everything, or subscribe to all the theories she presents, but I can tell you that she works very hard at her research, and she is very thorough, and also that she provides an alternative view of events and history that can offer a perspective that reveals new things the Lamestream Media will never, ever tell us. Give her a view if you haven’t already, and take the time to Like the videos of content creators like her and Dan Bongino.
Another person with whom you will cross paths if you research this overall CoronaVirus2019 shutdown is Candace Owens. Some of you will be familiar with her from FoxNews, or from other platforms, and on Twitter, she’s @RealCandaceO. She has real courage in many respects, and one of them is her willingness to take on the #FakeNews, particularly with respect to issues of race, and also with the pigeon-holing of black Americans as Democrats. She’s exposing those myths, and she has a new book coming out. Now, she’s exposing the governor of Connecticut who actually blamed the death of an infant on CoronaVirus when in fact, the death was due to being suffocated:
Since word is getting out— I can now confirm that the infant in CT was accidentally suffocated by its caretaker, who then called the police. @GovNedLamont KNEW this, & then lied to the world by linking it to the #coronavirus because he wants more Federal money.
He should RESIGN. https://t.co/q6L5V55DWh
This sort of displacement of blame onto CoronaVirus is rampant in states run by Democrats. It’s being done to grab more of the federal relief money from the $2Trillion package that Congress passed last week. It’s despicable, and it accounts for at least some of the mounting death toll being reported all over the news. It’s fraud. They’re mostly going to get away with it, since they compile the statistics, and they control the medical examiners, although these will mostly be considered “natural causes” and will never undergo autopsies. I’m not suggesting that there are no CoronaVirus deaths, as I’m sure there are, but as I covered in my previous article, this is all being blown way out of proportion. Now, we have even more evidence that this whole panic is contrived, and we also know the motive: This is all about elections, money, and power. What else? The idea here was to trap President Trump so that he would have to shut down the country. Instead, he left it to governors, as he should. He focused on the Federal response as is the job of the President. In short, he took the steps appropriate to the President under our constitution, but this is also why the Democrat-Media Complex kept pressing the President to take more steps, and force a state quarantine in New York.
Today, at the press briefing by the President’s CoronaVirus Response Team, he made it plain: “We have to get back to work.”
Remember, if it’s bad for America, Democrats approve. If it’s bad for Trump, Democrats insist. The media is now so utterly broken that the smarmy reporters in the room can’t help but become snotty in their questioning of the President. If I were the President, I’d throw at least half of them off the White House grounds and tell their networks or papers to try again with somebody else. There was never this kind of conduct toward President Obama. Not once. Not even during his most miserable and provocative failures, when actual reporters would be expected to be more insistent in their questioning. Here, the way these reporters talk to the President of the United States is an utter disgrace. Even were I given the opportunity to question Barack Obama in the White House in the aftermath of Benghazi, I’d never have been so basically rude and disrespectful. I certainly would have asked a couple seriously difficult questions. The problem here is that the media doesn’t really want any information. They’re not really asking questions designed to reveal any news, but merely questions aimed at catching the President in some inconsistency, or in some sort of disagreement with one or more members of his team. In some cases, they’re plainly argumentative. Just once, in the eight years of the incompetent and corrupt Obama administration, they should have gone after that President with such fervent zeal. Instead, they blithely pitched softballs that even the increasingly confused Joe Biden could hit out of the park.
Over the last few weeks, as the nation has attempted to deal with the WuFlu pandemic, one of the things that’s gotten short shrift is the economy. We had an economy in pretty good condition by the middle of February, and as you’ll remember, unlike during the Obama administration when the jobs numbers were “unexpectedly poor,” instead our Department of Labor found itself having to upgrade the numbers in weeks following original reports that understated the economy’s performance. Now, we’re losing jobs at a phenomenal rate, and President Trump has to do something to bring the economy back online soon, or the country will be wrecked. Most of the small businesses shutting down are highly leveraged, and with a halt in revenues, they’re facing serious, perhaps catastrophic, consequences. The typical situation looks like a Mom-and-Pop shop of some sort, opened up a business on tight margins, perhaps by re-mortgaging a recently paid-off home. Now, shut down by order of some public official, usually a governor, county judge, city manager or mayor. they find themselves without revenue. They have to lay off their employees, as a matter of pure financial survival, and then, within a month, they’re staring down the barrel of that debt service, and if they can’t service it, not only will they lose their business, but they might just lose everything. They’ll never be able to reopen. They’ll never be able to call up employees and offer them their old jobs back. Instead, the avalanche will gather momentum and mass, with a mounting depression at the bottom of the hill.
I am reminded of a line by Bruce Willis in one of the many Die Hard sequels. The young guy he’s escorting to the FBI makes an off-hand remark about crashing the “system.” Willis’ character stops, and lets the kid have it a bit: “It’s not a system. It’s people!” Or something to that effect. His point was to say it is very easy to imagine shutting down a system like shutting down a computer or an assembly line. For some reason, when people eliminate the myriad complications implied by specific, concrete human beings, it become easy to be cavalier about their disposition. The point Detective McClane was making is that “the system” is really people, and what you’re really talking about wrecking is the lives and dreams and aspirations and plans of real live people, just like you.
Democrats suffer from the same childish misunderstanding and unfocused view of the world around them. It’s easier to imagine an amorphous system that just gets “shut down.” The same is true of the economy. They see it like turning off an engine. Instead, it’s like putting a country’s worth of people into suspended animation, only without the preservative aspect. The decay, the atrophy, the heart failures and the deaths begin to mount immediately. In short order, it’s much worse than any disease. Our country is much more complex than most people imagine, but the fundamentals of the situation are simple. We’re wrecking the economy, which means we’re wrecking businesses and that means we are wrecking people. Each minute this goes on, more businesses are lost, and with them, jobs die. Most of them won’t be back, and this is where people who don’t understand the entrepreneurial cycle fail to see the real danger: Small business creates a sizable majority of jobs in the United States. If you’ve just gone out and created a business, and had it wrecked by a government-ordered closure, and probably lost substantial money, or worse, had your entire life’s work demolished, assuming you find yourself in the position to launch another business some day, would you? Why? The next time a virus comes along, the government might just shut you down again.
It isn’t simply that this response to this virus was overblown and entirely unnecessary, but that the entire methodology is bankrupt, unfeasible, and wrong. We must never permit this kind of shutdown again. Ever. Under any circumstance. We have created a situation that will take years to repair, if it can be fully repaired at all. Your individual rights are not and must not be subjected to the vagaries of virologists’ models. Your liberties must never be placed in the hands of governors, mayors, county judges, and other elected numb-skulls whose motives and decisions will always be dominated by politics, their public declarations to the contrary notwithstanding.
Ladies and gentlemen, the worst aspect of the great WuFlu shutdown of 2020 is the precedent set by permitting government to behave this way in the first place. The very idea that the government can order the shutdown of the country is a preposterous notion. This is tyranny, whether you’ve recognized it or not. For the business owners whose concerns are now in serious jeopardy, if not already wrecked, this much is obvious. They’re carrying the largest burden in this entire fiasco, and those of us who do not bear their burdens should be thoughtful about the losses they face as a result. It is their lives and liberties, along with the properties of these entrepreneurs that have been cast onto the pyre of sacrifices created by this exercise of government authority.
I believe President Trump has been played, and the economy laid waste as a result of his desire to safeguard the lives of Americans. I believe the people upon whose guidance he relied are not all good people with innocent or virtuous motives. I also believe that certain elements opportunistically joined into this attack on our country. I know the President was trapped between doing what he believed at the time to be the best path for saving lives and what he knew would be catastrophic for the long-term economic and financial health of the country. I can forgive him for his motive of protecting and saving lives, but I’m less forgiving in another aspect: He should have recognized that the people around him were simply another brand of deep-state players, equally corrupt and equally apt to carry out a different form of a coup d’etat. If you don’t see that this has been the motive, I’d urge you to look more closely.
From: Cheryl MillsTo: Hillary Clinton Date: 2013-01-23 11:21Subject: TODAY’S PERFORMANCE
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05797268 Date: 12/31/2015 RELEASE IN FULL
From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:21 PM
To:
Subject: FW: Today’s performance From your doctor admirer From: Fauci, Anthony (NIH/NIAID) [E] [mailto:AFAUCI@niaid.nih.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 6:10 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D
Subject: Today’s performance
Cheryl: Anyone who had any doubts about the Secretary’s stamina and capability following her illness had those doubts washed away by today’s performance before the Senate and the House. She faced extremely difficult circumstances at the Hearings and still she hit it right out of the park. Please tell her that we all love her and are very proud to know her.
Warm regards,
Tony Anthony S. Fauci, MD
Director National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Building 31, Room 7A-03 31 Center Drive, MSC 2520
National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-2520 Phone: (301) 496-2263 FAX: (301) 47-4409
E-mail: afauci
The information in this e-mail and any of its attachments is confidential and may contain sensitive information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage devices. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) shall not accept liability for any statements made that are the sender’s own and not expressly made on behalf of the NIAID by one of its representatives.
China Originated Viral Infectious Disease #19(COVID-19 a.k.a. #WuFlu)
Ladies and gentlemen, I occasionally write from what must seem to be a purely contrarian point of view. I realize that my approach to some topics makes me the natural target for those who demand conformity in all matters. On so-called “Anthropogenic Climate Change,” I’ve long maintained that the evidence in-hand in no way supports the will conclusions and claims of so-called “Climate Activists,” and that instead, simple logic exposes the foolishness of their claims to an extent that their motive is not revealed to be the result of simple ignorance, but instead one of intentional disinformation for political purposes. You can agree or disagree with my arguments on that topic, but in the past, as I’ve made my arguments, I’ve not heard any retorts to the logic. In this case of the Wuhan Coronavirus known formally as COVID-19(COronaVIrus Disease2019[*],) but herein called #WuFlu for shorthand, I believe we are being intentionally mis-informed and driven into an entirely unnecessary, unwarranted panic while simultaneously surrendering liberties to governmental demands in answer to the non-existent emergency that has aroused this ridiculous panic. That’s quite an allegation on my part, but as ever, I stand prepared to defend my assertion.
Don’t misunderstand: There IS a COVID-19. What there ISN’T is any evidence that:
#WuFlu is actually killing anybody
#WuFlu is lethal in and of itself
#WuFlu is any more lethal than ordinary influenza
If you have irrefutable evidence of ANY of these, please provide it in the comments below. To date, no government authority or medical institution in the private sector has yet to provide any. Let’s start by playing a logic game. Let’s imagine you’re a healthcare provider. Let’s further stipulate that a patient coming to you for care presents with the following list of symptoms:
Persistent Fever
Cough
Body Aches
That sounds just like #WuFlu! So the healthcare provider uses a test to determine that yes, indeed, you have #COVID-19, and from that moment on, if you die, it’s going to be assumed that COVID-19 killed you. But did it? Did they test you for other infectious agents? No! They’re not going to test you to see if you also have influenza, or some other disease. Once you’re tagged with “COVID-19,” you will be counted as having expired due to COVID-19 even if it was actually your lung cancer that killed you.
In the 2017-18 influenza season, the CDC reports an estimated 61,000 people died from influenza. First, note that this is an “estimate,” and second, that the death rate was roughly 1 in 1000. Roughly one person of every one-thousand who was infected with influenza purportedly died of it. I remember this particular influenza season quite well, because my father very nearly succumbed to pneumonia thought to be secondary to the respiratory influenza that ultimately killed so many people in that season. I knew a number of elderly people, primarily men in their late 70s or 80s, who either died or nearly died in that season. Most of them had other health issues(my father a diabetic, for instance,) and others with various forms of COPD or smoking, or heart issues. This should sound quite familiar to you, because it’s the same exact class of people allegedly dying by COVID-19.
In fact, every flu season, it is almost always this same class of people who die in large numbers from this crud. I know it. You know it. The numbers bear it out each year.
That said, let me ask you a question I’d like you to consider: If you’re tested positive for #WuFlu, what information do you have that excludes the possibility that if you’re exhibiting some or all of the symptoms above, that it’s the result of COVID-19 and not something else? This is one of those basic syllogisms with which you’re going to need to wrestle.
Of course, I’m not a physician, or a medical professional of any sort, and my studies in my profession have nothing to do with epidemiology, or any related field. What my field does heavily rely upon is logic. In all respects.
Here is a German doctor explaining the matter. If you’re not a German-speaker, you’ll need to rely upon the subtitles, but after consulting with my wife(a German by birth,) the subtitles are faithful to the good doctor’s intent:
https://youtu.be/p_AyuhbnPOI
Mark Twain(Samuel Clemens) is purported to have said:
It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Whether he wrote these precise words may be in doubt, but he certainly wrote:
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and hard it is to undo that work again!
It seems to me they mean the same, so let’s credit him with the sentiment if not the precise words. As Dr. Wodarg alleges, this Emperor seems to be naked.
Still doubting? That’s understandable, since I’m just a guy on the Internet with a keyboard and an opinion, and virtually everybody has at least one of those. Some of you will be familiar with Candace Owens, and I commend to you her work. She’s trying very hard to demolish the stranglehold she alleges that the #DemocratMediaComplex has on the black community. She posted this on Twitter(@RealCandaceO):
It’s from the CDC. What it represents is the sharp drop-off in Influenza Positive tests since the emergence of COVID19. In other words, what’s really happening is that if you test positive for COVID19, they’re not testing for anything else in most cases. They’re blaming everything on COVID19! Influenza has become an invisible killer for which we’re not testing. More, when people self-quarantine because they have the symptoms above, it’s being assumed in many cases that they have/had COVID19. There’s no verification in many cases.
Are you starting to see a trend? This should be getting your eyebrows raised, at least a bit. If not, you may be succumbing to the impetus of the herd.
I’m not going to tell you that there’s no danger from #WuFlu. You must make your own judgments, but make sure they’re your own judgments, and that you’re not being driven to them. What I notice is that Americans are increasingly frustrated and even more often, furious, as it becomes clear that we’re laying waste to the best economy on Earth in order to pursue an alleged public health crisis that may be even more false and more hyped than so-called “Anthropogenic Climate Change.”
While I’m on that topic, I’d like to bring a related matter to your consideration, also on the matter of COVID19, but also the possibility that local/regional environmental concerns might be contributing to the death toll being seen in various hot-spots around the globe. Tony Heller is a first-rate guy, and his website realclimatescience.com is first-rate. I’ve been reading his site for a long time, and I follow him on Twitter (@Tony_Heller). This video, also featuring a German doctor, is definitely worth the watch, albeit for somewhat different but related reasons:
Ladies and gentlemen, I want you to look out for your health, and I want you to look out especially for the health of those who are what might be termed “medically fragile,” inasmuch as they may be elderly, or have significant pre-existing conditions that would make them a target for any communicable respiratory pathogen. Wash your hands, mind your social distance, and begin to demand of the media and your political leaders: Where is the evidence?
We’re killing our economy, which will in turn surely kill MANY MORE PEOPLE than this disease will have done, and we have no evidence that COVID19 has actually killed ANYBODY. None. Nada.
Think about that.
We can go into motives another day. For the moment, ignore the question of motives, and focus instead on the situation. I don’t know exactly why, as of now, but it seems fairly clear to me that we’re being played. The panic is a scam. We need to demand our leaders explain why. Now.
Editor’s note[*] When this article originally published, it was stated that COVID-19 stands for “ChinaOriginatedViralInfectiousDisease#19” That was false, and while it had come from what seemed a reputable site, that site has also changed their annotation, so I have corrected mine. The fact remains that the virus originated, with the best information at hand, in the Wuhan Province of China in 2019.
